So, we should pin our hopes on a guy who can't beat out a guy who is getting FCS interest?
I can't tell if you're being serious or not.
I'll try to make the point more clear. In high school football, where the vast majority of kids aren't good enough to play in college, if you have to kids who are good enough athletes to play at the next level, you have to find a way to get both of them on the field.
So, if Kid A is good enough to play QB at an FCS school and Kid B is good enough to play at a BCS school in multiple positions (because he's just a great athlete), you let Kid A play quarterback and Kid B play WR/RB/QB because Kid C is some nose-picking jabroni who will most likely spend the next four years of his life working at Foot Locker, and you don't want him on the field because Kid A isn't as good of a QB as Kid B.
Maybe the combo of this kid at QB and Sams at WR is better than Sams at QB and the other kid at WR. So that's what the coach goes with. Regardless, it means you have two college level athletes on the field at the same time as opposed to one of them sitting on the bench because he's not as good at QB as the other guy.