Author Topic: We were lucky we didn't lose  (Read 8574 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline swish1

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 351
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #25 on: September 12, 2010, 12:17:18 AM »
With 3 minutes to go, up 41-17, Snyder put the starters back in?  Is that honestly what you're claiming?  :facepalm:

there was like 8 minutes to go when the 99 yard drive started...

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #26 on: September 12, 2010, 12:24:35 AM »
Missouri State Drive Summaries
START   QTR   POSS.   YARD   PLAYS   YARDS   RESULT
00:00     0                  KSU 0   0         0   
13:03     1      00:00   MOSU 12   3      1      Punt
11:50     1      00:00   MOSU 20   5      15      Punt
07:09     1      03:15   MOSU 35   10      35      Field Goal Missed
00:47     1      00:47   MOSU 20   5      9      Punt
09:45     2       00:00   MOSU 20   3     6      Punt
07:13     2      01:02   MOSU 14   3      9      Punt
05:15     2      00:56   MOSU 20   3      80      Passing Touchdown
00:28     2      00:28   MOSU 22   4      33      Fumble
15:00     3      00:00   MOSU 20   3      7      Punt
13:56     3      02:05   MOSU 30   6      13      Punt
08:25     3      04:07   MOSU 37   13      58      Field Goal Good
00:51     3      01:40   MOSU 26   5      74      Rushing Touchdown
14:11     4      08:03   MOSU 1   18      99      Passing Touchdown
02:35     4      02:35   MOSU 25   5      30      End of Game


Seems like there's a trend here but I can't quite put my finger on it...

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #27 on: September 12, 2010, 12:28:01 AM »
There is:  We got very lucky they didn't score on 3 more of those early drives - they had ample opportunity and just missed it.  Quit trying to defend our defense retards, they are terrible.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #28 on: September 12, 2010, 12:31:11 AM »
And there's Hemmy again, king of the retards. We're "lucky" the didn't do crap with the ball until we subbed in a bunch of back-ups?  Was our offense also "lucky" when it put up almost 500 yds, in basically 3 quarters?

Offline swish1

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 351
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #29 on: September 12, 2010, 12:33:22 AM »
And there's Hemmy again, king of the retards. We're "lucky" the didn't do feces with the ball until we subbed in a bunch of back-ups?  Was our offense also "lucky" when it put up almost 500 yds, in basically 3 quarters?

were you really impressed with our offense?  coffman looked a lot more confident, especially on that drive in the third quarter, but they werent impressive.

our secondary is garbage, and our d line puts 0 pressure on the qb.

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #30 on: September 12, 2010, 12:35:52 AM »
I love the early season meltdowns, especially the bball ones that have occurred the past 3 years.

Offline Pendergast

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1494
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #31 on: September 12, 2010, 12:41:23 AM »
There is:  We got very lucky they didn't score on 3 more of those early drives - they had ample opportunity and just missed it.  Quit trying to defend our defense retards, they are terrible.

Every team has "ample opportunity" it's a rough ridin' game.  I'm sure it had nothing to do with K-State's defense, they just "missed it."

JFC, you sound like a typical douche KU fan who thinks any game they lose is because they "beat themselves." 

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #32 on: September 12, 2010, 12:53:05 AM »
I love the early season meltdowns, especially the bball ones that have occurred the past 3 years.

 eff you guys for putting me in a position where I basically have to agree with pcatpat.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #33 on: September 12, 2010, 03:27:31 AM »
We weren't lucky that we scheduled a shitty team. LHC Bill Snyder did that by design.

Offline SuperG

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1036
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #34 on: September 12, 2010, 04:23:21 AM »
I'm saying the defense very vanilla-ishly mailed it in for the 2nd half.

Good.

Offline KSUTOMMY

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1575
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #35 on: September 12, 2010, 07:30:57 AM »
OK, so we had some scrubs in and points were scored against them - big motherfucking deal, would you want the alternative and leave the starters in late against a shitty team so we can have another Roberson 2003 situation? We can't afford for this defense to get dinged and THAT is the scariest crap of all.
We are K-State and we love to hire SHlTTY coaches.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #36 on: September 12, 2010, 07:32:29 AM »
Both lines got DOMINATED, we lucked out on some plays that could have made this very similar to La-La in 2008

God we suck.  :flush:

life's a biatch and then you die

shazbot! you

mrs catmatt is my attorney . . .

:surprised:

Offline wabash909

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • scattered all over like seeds in the wind
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #37 on: September 12, 2010, 07:35:32 AM »
We all kind of knew the defense wasn't going to be good, right?  Thought we had pretty well established that.  So, why are we all mad all of a sudden now??



Texas Christian University coach Gary Patterson has been hired as Kansas State's 34th football coach, multiple sources have confirmed to GoPowercat.com.  Patterson replaces Ron Prince, who was fired Wednesday. - Tim Fitzgerald   Nov, 7, 2008

Offline KSUTOMMY

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1575
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #38 on: September 12, 2010, 07:47:32 AM »
We all kind of knew the defense wasn't going to be good, right?  Thought we had pretty well established that.  So, why are we all mad all of a sudden now??





This is true, but watching these guys is still very difficult, especially when they look like DOG$H!T agaist 1-AA MO ST.
We are K-State and we love to hire SHlTTY coaches.

Offline wabash909

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • scattered all over like seeds in the wind
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #39 on: September 12, 2010, 07:59:26 AM »
The only thing that really disgusts me about our defense is Tyson Hartman.  Mostly because he was considered good for some reason and he is actually embarrassingly bad.  Everything else is just par for the course, IMO.

It's a Chris Cosh defense.  We sort of knew we'd be eating this feces sandwich.  No need to be all suprised that it tastes like feces, right?


Texas Christian University coach Gary Patterson has been hired as Kansas State's 34th football coach, multiple sources have confirmed to GoPowercat.com.  Patterson replaces Ron Prince, who was fired Wednesday. - Tim Fitzgerald   Nov, 7, 2008

Offline KSUTOMMY

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1575
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #40 on: September 12, 2010, 08:11:48 AM »
The only thing that really disgusts me about our defense is Tyson Hartman.  Mostly because he was considered good for some reason and he is actually embarrassingly bad.  Everything else is just par for the course, IMO.

It's a Chris Cosh defense.  We sort of knew we'd be eating this feces sandwich.  No need to be all suprised that it tastes like feces, right?




Blaming inability and suckiness on Cosh? You can't teach talent, either you have it or you don't. FWIW, I'm not an apologist for Cosh, but show me a top-flight DC who can put a shine on this piece of crap defense if you know of one.
We are K-State and we love to hire SHlTTY coaches.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #41 on: September 12, 2010, 08:17:50 AM »
Cosh has never put a shine on any defense.   He's been run out or nearly run out of every DC job he's ever had.


catzacker

  • Guest
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #42 on: September 12, 2010, 08:23:17 AM »
Cosh has never put a shine on any defense.   He's been run out or nearly run out of every DC job he's ever had.



yep. cosh, regardless of the talent he has, is terrible.  but bill loves him because he works alot of hours and stuff.

Offline Lynch

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 129
  • KSUftw smells like salty peanuts.
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #43 on: September 12, 2010, 08:49:46 AM »
We weren't lucky that we scheduled a shitty team. LHC Bill Snyder did that by design.

This.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #44 on: September 12, 2010, 09:46:45 AM »
The only thing that really disgusts me about our defense is Tyson Hartman.  Mostly because he was considered good for some reason and he is actually embarrassingly bad.  Everything else is just par for the course, IMO.

It's a Chris Cosh defense.  We sort of knew we'd be eating this feces sandwich.  No need to be all suprised that it tastes like feces, right?




Marcus Watts 2.0???

Or even worse :ohno: :ohno: :runaway:

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #45 on: September 12, 2010, 09:55:06 AM »
Cosh has never put a shine on any defense.   He's been run out or nearly run out of every DC job he's ever had.



yep. cosh, regardless of the talent he has, is terrible.  but bill loves him because he works alot of hours and stuff.

This is why I'm switching over to goEMAW.  This is the HFBIQ I was looking for.

 :cry: <---- Me because I feel like I've finally found a home.

PS - Chris Cosh is worse than Bob Elliot

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41989
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #46 on: September 12, 2010, 09:56:07 AM »
Cosh has never put a shine on any defense.   He's been run out or nearly run out of every DC job he's ever had.



yep. cosh, regardless of the talent he has, is terrible.  but bill loves him because he works alot of hours and stuff.

This is why I'm switching over to goEMAW.  This is the HFBIQ I was looking for.

 :cry: <---- Me because I feel like I've finally found a home.

PS - Chris Cosh is worse than Bob Elliot

That'll be $9.95/month.  Make your check out to goEMAW legal defense fund.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #47 on: September 12, 2010, 10:08:46 AM »
Cosh has never put a shine on any defense.   He's been run out or nearly run out of every DC job he's ever had.



yep. cosh, regardless of the talent he has, is terrible.  but bill loves him because he works alot of hours and stuff.

This is why I'm switching over to goEMAW.  This is the HFBIQ I was looking for.

 :cry: <---- Me because I feel like I've finally found a home.

PS - Chris Cosh is worse than Bob Elliot

That'll be $9.95/month.  Make your check out to goEMAW legal defense fund.

 :surprised:

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #48 on: September 12, 2010, 10:38:21 AM »
Both lines got DOMINATED, we lucked out on some plays that could have made this very similar to La-La in 2008

God we suck.  :flush:

GMAFB  :facepalm:

Sugar Dick

  • Guest
Re: We were lucky we didn't lose
« Reply #49 on: September 12, 2010, 10:49:15 AM »
I'm pretty sure Hartman, Butler and Lamur's white replacement were baked for that game.  They played f*cking horrible.  Please don't lump in Garrett and Sweeney with those three, they both played well.

Our front four didn't get much pressure, but they didn't do anything but containment rush.  Sweeney and Garrett were in man all night and their cover guys didn't do sh*t.  We did the one blitz where we have Hrebec runs as fast as he can into the guard or the center, but that was about it from a scheme standpoint.  I can't believe it took Cosh until the 4th quarter to send an outside blitz considering that team ran shotgun 5-7 step drop all game, but it is MoState.

Face it retards, it looked like a pre-season NFL game on defense from a scheme standpoint.  Wait to meltdown until Iowa State puts up 400+ yards of offense and we're actually trying to do something.

Carson Coffman put up like a 200 QB rating and nobody is calling him Joe Montana (except OK Cat).