Author Topic: Nebraska still hasn't named their starting QB.  (Read 1276 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline I_have_purplewood

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3019
    • View Profile
Nebraska still hasn't named their starting QB.
« on: August 30, 2010, 12:34:54 PM »
My god they must all suck!!  :lol: :lol:


What are they waiting on??  :lol: :dunno: :lol:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
Fifteen minutes later, when the Kansas locker room opened its doors to the media, the Jayhawks were still crying. Literally, bawling. All of them. I've never seen anything like it, and I've seen devastated college locker rooms -- after losses in the Final Four, the national championship game -- ever

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska still hasn't named their starting QB.
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2010, 01:23:23 PM »
All the NU fans I've talked to say it doesn't matter because the 'skers will be better at every position this year on both sides of the ball, and they were really only a few plays away from being national champs last year.

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7002
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska still hasn't named their starting QB.
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2010, 01:26:44 PM »
All the NU fans I've talked to say it doesn't matter because the 'skers will be better at every position this year on both sides of the ball, and they were really only a few plays away from being national champs last year.

Yea and Suh slowed Crick down, not allowing Crick to show his full potential.  <-----hear that every time I talk to a NU fan
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

CATS2WIN

  • Guest
Re: Nebraska still hasn't named their starting QB.
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2010, 01:26:54 PM »
All the NU fans I've talked to say it doesn't matter because the 'skers will be better at every position this year on both sides of the ball, and they were really only a few plays and :01 away from being national champs last year.

Don't forget the :01

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska still hasn't named their starting QB.
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2010, 01:30:16 PM »
All the NU fans I've talked to say it doesn't matter because the 'skers will be better at every position this year on both sides of the ball, and they were really only a few plays away from being national champs last year.

Yea and Suh slowed Crick down, not allowing Crick to show his full potential.  <-----hear that every time I talk to a NU fan

The last fan I talked to said that Crick will be at least as good as Suh this year and because teams will have to game plan for him, whoever wins the starting spot opposite of Crick will just get ignored and he will have even better numbers than Crick did last year. Hard to argue with the logic that comes from their nowlege of the game of football.

Offline doom

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3622
    • View Profile
Re: Nebraska still hasn't named their starting QB.
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2010, 01:42:28 PM »
NU stealing the Cone of Silence?!?
“They said something along the lines of ‘it kind of sounds like you’d be interested in it.’ And I said ‘hell yeah I am. Why not?’” -Doug Gottlieb