Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 1972427 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37937
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23575 on: December 01, 2023, 01:14:21 PM »
Chiefs Kingdom would finally make sense.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45872
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23576 on: December 02, 2023, 10:04:22 AM »

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15479
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23577 on: December 02, 2023, 05:19:46 PM »
so you guys just strictly looking at this from the butterfly definition and not the sovereign ruler of a kingdom or empire definition? just because your Camero can go into eco mode doesn't mean you shouldn't fire up all 8 cylinders every once in a while iykwim
Name one emperor that wasn’t a total dbag and maybe I’ll see your side. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32362
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23578 on: December 03, 2023, 06:59:12 PM »
Looks p cold in Green Bay 2nite
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline KST8FAN

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3495
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23579 on: December 03, 2023, 07:09:05 PM »
Did we need Taylor tonight to negate Simone Biles in the stadium?

UPDATE, she's there!


Tom

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk
« Last Edit: December 03, 2023, 07:22:22 PM by KST8FAN »

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67135
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23580 on: December 03, 2023, 07:20:59 PM »
weezy baby
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32362
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23581 on: December 03, 2023, 07:51:23 PM »
Might have to adjust the game plan for our RT getting murdered all night
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23582 on: December 03, 2023, 08:25:39 PM »
why does the kc defense suck today?  today's not a good day for them to suck.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12625
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23583 on: December 03, 2023, 09:20:22 PM »
This isn’t the best game we’ve had.
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40375
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23584 on: December 03, 2023, 10:28:50 PM »
weird game

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23585 on: December 03, 2023, 10:35:35 PM »
rough ridin' chiefs, man.  goddamn.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27675
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23586 on: December 04, 2023, 08:15:40 AM »
I fear the Bills game could be trouble.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40375
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23587 on: December 04, 2023, 08:27:06 AM »
i don't think the bills offense is capable of playing as clean of a game as the packers did last night, that was pretty impressive

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27675
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23588 on: December 04, 2023, 09:05:46 AM »
Good point. Allen is good for a LOL red zone turnover at least once a game. That will help..

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13841
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23589 on: December 04, 2023, 10:56:30 AM »
I fear the Bills game could be trouble.

It was always going to be trouble my dude

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32362
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23590 on: December 04, 2023, 12:38:20 PM »
I fell asleep before the game ended, didn't realize this happened. Was it as egregious live?

https://x.com/codybtapp/status/1731530309861015817?s=46&t=tYwTUm4s0RPJhorbucsbBg
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67135
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23591 on: December 04, 2023, 12:40:29 PM »
Yes
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40375
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23592 on: December 04, 2023, 02:05:17 PM »
it came at a weird time, like buried in a flurry of bizarre calls/noncalls so it all felt surreal

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13841
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23593 on: December 04, 2023, 02:21:05 PM »
It annoyed me that the refs let the rashee non fumble play out bc he was so clearly down even in game speed and that cost us 15 yds and the whole sequence contributed to the chaos that mocat is referring to

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40375
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23594 on: December 04, 2023, 02:40:41 PM »
GB was by far the better team last night. lefleur generally had a great gameplan with lots of lateral movement and easy throws for Love. love was as dialed as i've seen a QB vs the chiefs this year. his wtf throws were very few and far between (the lofty deep ball into triple coverage, and the slant ball that was well behind both receiver and defender come to mind), and the chiefs did not make him pay for the few mistakes he did make. I wouldn't even say the defense played poorly, but they were certainly out-executed.
the chiefs offense was the chiefs offense. nobody on that side of the ball scares a defense. rice, pacheco, and kelce are the only viable options to receive touches. mahomes is mahomes, pacheco is pacheco, kelce is trending down. and although rice is trending up, it's very unlikely that he can singlehandedly change how defenses play KC enough to matter for everyone else to improve.
kc will need their opponents to screw up a lot more than GB did if they want to advance in the playoffs. luckily most of the time, their opponents will screw up and leave the door open for mahomes to do some witchy sh*t and pull out a W
« Last Edit: December 04, 2023, 02:47:03 PM by mocat »

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40375
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23595 on: December 04, 2023, 02:46:17 PM »
oh also i got very annoyed with everyone upset with andy for going for 2 down 2 early in the 2nd half. they didn't get the 2pt attempt, so later GB went up 9 after scoring a TD. the "tHeY wOuLd OnLy Be DoWn OnE sCoRe" crowd was very loud. do people saying that not understand being down 8 requires a two point conversion to tie? what does it matter if the 2pt attempt came early or late in the game? if anything it is better to attempt the 2pt conversion earlier in the game so if you don't make it, you have more time to adjust your strategy and make up for it later (WHICH THEY DID BTW!). infuriating

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27675
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23596 on: December 04, 2023, 03:31:31 PM »
Maybe I'm a dumb or a stupid but I still think Toney can be a weapon

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12625
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23597 on: December 04, 2023, 03:37:35 PM »
Guys, last night was really dumb.
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18010
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23598 on: December 04, 2023, 03:40:34 PM »
Maybe I'm a dumb or a stupid but I still think Toney can be a weapon

Toney is capable but not reliable, imo

Offline kstate4life

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 995
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #23599 on: December 04, 2023, 04:24:59 PM »
Maybe I'm a dumb or a stupid but I still think Toney can be a weapon

Toney is capable but not reliable, imo

I think I read Reid said they are holding him back so he will stay healthy for the entire season.  At some point you have to just cut him loose.  He is made of glass though, so whenever that happens it probably won't last very long.