Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 1502339 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4587
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16625 on: January 22, 2019, 01:54:59 PM »
I would rather them take an extra couple minutes and get the call right.  What point is it to look at it for 2 minutes and still get it wrong?

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

beats me but they did it on the Hogan catch.
The difference is that it's clear that it didn't touch Edelman, and it's a judgement call whether Hogan had control when the ball touched the ground.  I bet if there were a different angle that showed him clearly not having possession, they would have looked at it for another 30 seconds.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk


Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16626 on: January 22, 2019, 01:55:23 PM »
Rex Ryan an early name being listed.  :crossfingers:

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16627 on: January 22, 2019, 01:57:16 PM »
Uh I thought you wanted to go to the Superbowl?

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4587
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16628 on: January 22, 2019, 01:59:49 PM »
Chings, they are just looking for a new scapegoat.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk


Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16629 on: January 22, 2019, 02:02:33 PM »
He's had some good defenses.  :dunno:

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16630 on: January 22, 2019, 02:02:43 PM »
I could be wrong, but this seems like the kind of knee jerk reaction that rarely actually helps.

If Mahomes had one more year of experience under his belt, the Cheifs would have won that game going away. 

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16631 on: January 22, 2019, 02:09:27 PM »
We've been dealing with 6 seasons of shitty defense under Sutton. He should have been gone two years ago. He finished 31st this year in the league, with the #1 pass rush in the NFL.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16632 on: January 22, 2019, 02:15:25 PM »
Easiest decision of the off season. Glad the move came swiftly

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16633 on: January 22, 2019, 02:18:33 PM »
I could be wrong, but this seems like the kind of knee jerk reaction that rarely actually helps.

If Mahomes had one more year of experience under his belt, the Cheifs would have won that game going away.

Yup, probably would be back2back world football champions
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46510
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16634 on: January 22, 2019, 02:24:28 PM »
bring back gunther


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19761
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16635 on: January 22, 2019, 02:29:18 PM »
Marvin Lewis

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16636 on: January 22, 2019, 02:34:52 PM »
Chiefs 2020 just wisped across my cheek like the breath of a new born baby . . .


Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15308
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16637 on: January 22, 2019, 02:36:33 PM »

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64044
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16638 on: January 22, 2019, 02:37:32 PM »
I feel like this is a job for the 'lark
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16639 on: January 22, 2019, 02:39:32 PM »
Would take Gunther pretty hard. Is he like 80?
:adios:

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16640 on: January 22, 2019, 02:40:35 PM »
how about no to Rex or Gunther or any old weirdos.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16641 on: January 22, 2019, 02:41:17 PM »
I could be wrong, but this seems like the kind of knee jerk reaction that rarely actually helps.

If Mahomes had one more year of experience under his belt, the Cheifs would have won that game going away.

I don't know. I don't look at the game and say Mahomes inexperience was the issue at all.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16642 on: January 22, 2019, 03:30:58 PM »
seeing lots of commentary this morning about the NFL needing to change its overtime rules. i think the overall concept is fine. the only thing i would change is making the team that chooses to receive begin their drive at their own 20 yard line. or maybe you start em even further back, say to the 15 yard line. you have to tweak it to the point where the decision if you win the toss is less obvious.

belichick was an early proponent of kicking off to start OT, depending on conditions and opponent. he's won by kicking off first in OT and he's also lost.

NFL teams score touchdowns on roughly 20 percent of their drives. this year, teams that got ball first in OT scored TDs on their first possession 4 of 17 times (23.5%). these percentages will obviously skew up or down depending on quality of offense or defense, but each coach is free to build their team in accordance with the rules as much as they want.

if the ravens played the pats to a regulation draw and won the toss in OT, my guess is that they would kick off.

i'm obviously not opposed to each team getting a possession in playoff OT. that would be perfectly fine. i don't think that's necessary in regular season games however.

I'm fine with overtime the way it is. In the regular season keep it how it is, in the playoffs, guarantee each team a possession. I've never liked college overtime. It feels gimicky.

And everyone complaining about the overtime, at some point the Chiefs were going to have to get a stop. Even if the Chiefs were guaranteed a possession, we'd need a TD, and unless you go for 2, you'd need a stop AND a score after that to win. It was going to be tough regardless. 

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16643 on: January 22, 2019, 03:32:29 PM »
Just play a full quarter.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16644 on: January 22, 2019, 03:34:36 PM »
-i have not watched the broadcast and have not read much analysis, so it's possible i'm missing something here. But in real time (and especially afterward) i hated andy's timeout on 3rd-and-4 late in the 2nd quarter. the pats seemed content to go into half up 7-0 and the chiefs should have been thrilled with that. the worst-case scenario without a timeout seemed to be a pats field goal and a 10-pt deficit. the upside, let's be honest, was super limited. if the chiefs force a punt, maybe they respond with a field goal and cut it to 4. if the pats get a first down - more likely than unlikely - then they're barreling down the field for the net plus 3 with a FG. tragically, they got a touchdown (and nearly got the ball again after mahomes fumbed moments later). so to recap, the pats were likely going to half up 7-0 or, at worst, 10-0; and instead they went in up 14-0 and were a bounce away from 17-0. just a disastrous and costly sequence there.
I 100% agree with you and you're the first person I've seen talking about this since last night.  I was irate when we called that timeout.  If they want to eat the possession and give us the ball down 7 after halftime, TAKE IT.  That was so frustrating.

By the way, the stadium was the best football environment I've ever been in.  The entire stadium feels like the student section at K-State.  Everyone standing 100% of the time.  I honestly don't know how middle aged people endure it.  I am physically exhausted just from being at the game and standing and yelling.

Yeah the end of the 1st half, the timeout, then the big screen pass, then the touchdown, was so deflating. I didn't hate the TO at the time, but I agree with the point.

And yes D-Lew, that was incredible. It was so loud and energetic every play. The way they cram people in there, with tiny aisles and crammed seats, at some point it will end. But man, that was an amazing thing to experience.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16751
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16645 on: January 22, 2019, 03:44:35 PM »
i liked the TO and wanted to get a stop and then score points.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16646 on: January 22, 2019, 04:02:03 PM »
Just play a full quarter.
Maybe in the playoffs but they already cut regular season OT to 10 minutes. I don’t think teams or the NFLPA want to keep going at 15 minute clips.

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16647 on: January 22, 2019, 04:03:27 PM »
i like jack del rio

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6930
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16648 on: January 22, 2019, 04:12:35 PM »
Venables!   :D
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #16649 on: January 22, 2019, 04:58:38 PM »