0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.
Man, if there is hard evidence on Hill, the DA is going to look like a real dolt.Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Quote from: kitten_mittons on April 25, 2019, 05:44:21 PMMan, if there is hard evidence on Hill, the DA is going to look like a real dolt.Sent from my SM-G975U using TapatalkShe said they just got the audio today. Her friend leaked it for her.
https://twitter.com/cdotharrison/status/1121549458263695360?s=21. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
in the end, EMAW will always win.
I fully support the Chiefs cutting him but I am going to be pissed when the NFL allows the Browns to sign him next month. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can they un-ban the Patriots fan that threw beer on him?Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Quote from: kitten_mittons on April 25, 2019, 08:28:55 PMCan they un-ban the Patriots fan that threw beer on him?Sent from my SM-G975U using TapatalkStop
Quote from: kitten_mittons on April 25, 2019, 03:53:53 PMQuote from: 8manpick on April 25, 2019, 03:46:25 PMQuote from: kitten_mittons on April 25, 2019, 03:41:11 PMPretty much the worst-case scenario is if a 3rd party hurt the child and his parents are protecting the 3rd party over their child. Sent from my SM-G975U using TapatalkIt’s only a worst case scenario if you think the parents are continuing to allow the third party the possibility of harming their child. If they’ve taken care of it and don’t want the third-party to be prosecuted, so be it. I don’t think that is a particularly likely scenario, but there sure is a lot of conclusion jumping going on.I don't think it's super likely, either, but some are saying, "We don't know if his parents were even involved!" Which is dumb, because they sure know who was responsible for him if they weren't, and if I knew of someone who harmed my child, causing child services to LITERALLY TAKE MY CHILD AWAY, I wouldn't just take care of it myself, I'd tell the authorities and get my child back.Again, the most likely scenario is that it was one of the parents, and they themselves do not want to go to jail.Sent from my SM-G975U using TapatalkYeah, it doesn’t make sense in the context of having their kid taken away. My theory was that grandpa or uncle or something beat the hell out of them and they just got them out of the picture instead of getting them thrown in jail.
Quote from: 8manpick on April 25, 2019, 03:46:25 PMQuote from: kitten_mittons on April 25, 2019, 03:41:11 PMPretty much the worst-case scenario is if a 3rd party hurt the child and his parents are protecting the 3rd party over their child. Sent from my SM-G975U using TapatalkIt’s only a worst case scenario if you think the parents are continuing to allow the third party the possibility of harming their child. If they’ve taken care of it and don’t want the third-party to be prosecuted, so be it. I don’t think that is a particularly likely scenario, but there sure is a lot of conclusion jumping going on.I don't think it's super likely, either, but some are saying, "We don't know if his parents were even involved!" Which is dumb, because they sure know who was responsible for him if they weren't, and if I knew of someone who harmed my child, causing child services to LITERALLY TAKE MY CHILD AWAY, I wouldn't just take care of it myself, I'd tell the authorities and get my child back.Again, the most likely scenario is that it was one of the parents, and they themselves do not want to go to jail.Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Quote from: kitten_mittons on April 25, 2019, 03:41:11 PMPretty much the worst-case scenario is if a 3rd party hurt the child and his parents are protecting the 3rd party over their child. Sent from my SM-G975U using TapatalkIt’s only a worst case scenario if you think the parents are continuing to allow the third party the possibility of harming their child. If they’ve taken care of it and don’t want the third-party to be prosecuted, so be it. I don’t think that is a particularly likely scenario, but there sure is a lot of conclusion jumping going on.
Pretty much the worst-case scenario is if a 3rd party hurt the child and his parents are protecting the 3rd party over their child. Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
Chiefs are doing what any other NFL organization would do....nothing. They only have to cover their ass if the video evidence gets shown millions of times across social media and news outlets. This will be off ESPN's Top Headlines after today and will be forgotten about by most. Hunt is gone for this reason (because he lied to the Hunt family). I will actually be surprised if Chiefs/NFL suspends Hill at all. Just like the investigation, they have nothing that proves Tyreek Hill was involved in harming a child (thanks to Overland Park's shitty police report). This kid deserves protection, but the only thing being protected is Tyreek's career. I just want to make clear that the DA did say a crime occurred. Unfortunately, this was not an "accident" and/or "misunderstanding" like we all were hoping.
