Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 2120812 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20631
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1425 on: September 16, 2012, 05:27:19 PM »
at least we aren't new england sheesh

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1426 on: September 16, 2012, 05:30:10 PM »
I am telling myself St. Fatty is still running things and the Chiefs sucking is the price to be paid for an EMAW dream season

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4604
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1427 on: September 16, 2012, 06:00:54 PM »
I try to warn you guys, but you keep doing this to yourselves.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1428 on: September 16, 2012, 06:31:51 PM »
Clark Hunt will die before he parts with the Chiefs.  As a result, we are stuck with losing.  Unfortunately, Clark appears to be a very healthy guy.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1429 on: September 16, 2012, 07:21:56 PM »
Good article from Mellinger on Chiefs and Peoli.


http://www.kansascity.com/2012/09/16/3818720/hunt-needs-to-make-major-changes.html


Is Bill Cowher ready to come back to the game?

Offline TheHamburglar

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5969
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1430 on: September 16, 2012, 07:47:33 PM »
I listened on the radio on my drive home today. The whole second half, after the Bills would make a good play Len would just let out an "uhhh, and this team got throttled by the Jets last week.". Mitch would just respond with a very unenthusiastic "yup".  You could just hear the "what the hell have they done to my team?" in Len's voice.
I got a guy on the other line about some white walls

Offline j-dub

  • fattyfest dance champion '14
  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 4782
  • "I wanna get hurt!"
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1431 on: September 17, 2012, 08:39:50 AM »
babb and mellinger finally hit pioli hard in the star. i doubt it will cause clark to do anything intelligent, but we can always hope.

pioli's got to go if the chiefs are going to make an honest run at playing good football.
"I started calling him John during the game, cause he was rocking it like No. 7 -- like Elway," Harper said."

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42623
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1432 on: September 17, 2012, 08:52:10 AM »

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1433 on: September 17, 2012, 08:58:53 AM »
really gets the sports writers talking on their favorite subject to talk about (sports writers)

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1434 on: September 17, 2012, 08:59:51 AM »
I mean, if you dumbfucks were as passionate about talking sports as you were about talking about sports writing you could probably go pretty far in life. but, NOPE.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1435 on: September 17, 2012, 09:20:13 AM »
I mean, if you dumbfucks were as passionate about talking sports as you were about talking about sports writing you could probably go pretty far in life. but, NOPE.

I enjoy it sometimes.  They are worse than junior high girls...just vicious with each other.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1436 on: September 17, 2012, 09:22:30 AM »
I mean, if you dumbfucks were as passionate about talking sports as you were about talking about sports writing you could probably go pretty far in life. but, NOPE.

I enjoy it sometimes.  They are worse than junior high girls...just vicious with each other.

They are more quick to give twitter oral to each other over pieces of crap that they write. They all compliment hunt from the national guys making sure to reference their "@" and then slam them without alerting them of what they are doing.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1437 on: September 17, 2012, 09:27:33 AM »
I mean, if you dumbfucks were as passionate about talking sports as you were about talking about sports writing you could probably go pretty far in life. but, NOPE.

I enjoy it sometimes.  They are worse than junior high girls...just vicious with each other.

They are more quick to give twitter oral to each other over pieces of crap that they write. They all compliment hunt from the national guys making sure to reference their "@" and then slam them without alerting them of what they are doing.

It's really amazing how consistent it is as well.  It's not just the Chiefs.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1438 on: September 17, 2012, 09:31:43 AM »
no, it's not just the chiefs. but the KC Star guys writing their predictable "chiefs are bad, it's this person's fault" pieces and then getting that reaction from dumbfucks (who apparently didn't see it coming and were impressed?) is just the most recent occurrence. I mean, I'm aware that the market is not going to be saturated with intelligent people given the payscale of the field but, good grief.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1439 on: September 17, 2012, 09:33:49 AM »
FWIW, I don't think you can win big with Cassell, unless you have 2001 Ray Lewis on your defense.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1440 on: September 17, 2012, 09:56:04 AM »
FWIW, I don't think you can win big with Cassell, unless you have 2001 Ray Lewis on your defense.

I don't think this Chiefs team could win big with Tom Brady. They have a ton of issues.

Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 12302
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1441 on: September 17, 2012, 09:57:51 AM »
Man, I actually thought the chefs would be good this year  :facepalm:


Offline j-dub

  • fattyfest dance champion '14
  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 4782
  • "I wanna get hurt!"
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1442 on: September 17, 2012, 10:11:31 AM »
no, it's not just the chiefs. but the KC Star guys writing their predictable "chiefs are bad, it's this person's fault" pieces and then getting that reaction from dumbfucks (who apparently didn't see it coming and were impressed?) is just the most recent occurrence. I mean, I'm aware that the market is not going to be saturated with intelligent people given the payscale of the field but, good grief.

the star ordinarily lacks the balls to call out anyone in power over at 1 arrowhead drive. they'll go after haley when it's handfed to them, etc.. but outside of whitlock going after carl and pioli, they typically nod yes to hunt and the g.m.

granted, it's not surprising that babb let loose a couple shots on his way out of town..
"I started calling him John during the game, cause he was rocking it like No. 7 -- like Elway," Harper said."

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1443 on: September 17, 2012, 03:14:57 PM »
Good lord, Romeo is unfit to coach. WTF is he talking about?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1444 on: September 17, 2012, 03:16:04 PM »
Good lord, Romeo is unfit to coach. WTF is he talking about?

I heard him after last week's game and thought the same. What's his excuse this week?

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1445 on: September 17, 2012, 03:17:31 PM »
Good lord, Romeo is unfit to coach. WTF is he talking about?

I heard him after last week's game and thought the same. What's his excuse this week?
I am honestly not able to decipher what he is trying to say. This has to be the worst press conf. ever.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16962
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1446 on: September 17, 2012, 04:20:15 PM »
he's pretty bad

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1447 on: September 17, 2012, 04:22:32 PM »
Every time the Chiefs fire a head coach, they just replace him with somebody worse.

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1448 on: September 17, 2012, 04:34:07 PM »
Every time the Chiefs fire a head coach, they just replace him with somebody worse.
Hard to believe that Herm was two coaches ago...

Offline CHONGS

  • The Producer
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20117
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1449 on: September 17, 2012, 06:17:43 PM »
maybe the coaches arent the problem...