YES!

[Sugar Dick]

42Yardstick, what happened to you?

[The42Yardstick]

42Yardstick, what happened to you?

Yeah, I'm not sure how I ended up posting here. dammit, must step up my game from now on

[Sugar Dick]

42Yardstick, what happened to you?

Yeah, I'm not sure how I ended up posting here. dammit, must step up my game from now on

Reading this thread got me wondering:

Why are liberals strict constructionalists when it comes to the Bible, but believe in a "living document" when it comes to the Constitution?


Also, still wondering who had standing to bring the suit?  Did the club bring it against the school, or was it a gay/atheist that brought it against the club and school?

[Rage Against the McKee]

42Yardstick, what happened to you?

Yeah, I'm not sure how I ended up posting here. dammit, must step up my game from now on

Reading this thread got me wondering:

Why are liberals strict constructionalists when it comes to the Bible, but believe in a "living document" when it comes to the Constitution?


Also, still wondering who had standing to bring the suit?  Did the club bring it against the school, or was it a gay/atheist that brought it against the club and school?

The club brought it against the school because the school stopped funding them. The school did still let them meet on campus. I really only think the school is in the wrong here if other religious groups who don't let any student join are getting school funding.

[Sugar Dick]

42Yardstick, what happened to you?

Yeah, I'm not sure how I ended up posting here. dammit, must step up my game from now on

Reading this thread got me wondering:

Why are liberals strict constructionalists when it comes to the Bible, but believe in a "living document" when it comes to the Constitution?


Also, still wondering who had standing to bring the suit?  Did the club bring it against the school, or was it a gay/atheist that brought it against the club and school?

The club brought it against the school because the school stopped funding them. The school did still let them meet on campus. I really only think the school is in the wrong here if other religious groups who don't let any student join are getting school funding.

Thanks. 

I'm fine with this ruling