Author Topic: Pseudo Wildcats next to get what's cooking (Read 4303 times)

Daddy Claxton · « **Reply #50 on:** February 12, 2025, 08:59:20 AM »

Quote from: KST8FAN on February 11, 2025, 09:25:28 PM

Did we escape with a missed over and back or did he need to dribble to establish possession in front court?

Tom

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

https://videorulebook.nba.com/archive/backcourt-violation-ball-is-passed-from-frontcourt-to-player-with-backcourt-status/

Stevesie60 · « **Reply #51 on:** February 12, 2025, 09:37:24 AM »

I hate that the thing that I'm commenting on first is negative because that was so fun, but how the hell did they overturn that goal tending? It's especially bullshit since we got the rebound and scored before they blew the whistle.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #52 on:** February 12, 2025, 11:43:01 AM »

Quote from: Daddy Claxton on February 12, 2025, 08:59:20 AM

Quote from: KST8FAN on February 11, 2025, 09:25:28 PM
Did we escape with a missed over and back or did he need to dribble to establish possession in front court?

Tom

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

https://videorulebook.nba.com/archive/backcourt-violation-ball-is-passed-from-frontcourt-to-player-with-backcourt-status/

I do not believe the scenario shown is applicable to the situation last night.

KST8FAN · « **Reply #53 on:** February 12, 2025, 12:04:09 PM »

I need to find the video. I have a 30-year veteran official reviewing it for us.

I know from my coaching days before there is a back court violation the player and the ball have to be established in front court.

The classic scenario is a player dribbling steps one foot in front court while the ball and his other foot are still in back court. Then, fans and some coaches lose their crap when his front court foot comes back to back court. It's not over and back because both feet and the ball never got establish in front court.

I am reading a ball played in from out of bounds has no front or back court status, but I can't find what makes the ball status change.

Last night the ball was thrown in by Arizona from the baseline, caught by a Cat who clearly had both feet in front court then passed to a player clearly in the back court.

Tom

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

Daddy Claxton · « **Reply #54 on:** February 12, 2025, 01:03:18 PM »

What i saw was Dug catching the ball and establishing possession with both feet in the front court. Then he threw it to Max who was established in the backcourt and Max caught it before he was established in the front court. Backcourt violation.

KST8FAN · « **Reply #55 on:** February 12, 2025, 02:32:11 PM »

Quote from: Daddy Claxton on February 12, 2025, 01:03:18 PM

What i saw was Dug catching the ball and establishing possession with both feet in the front court. Then he threw it to Max who was established in the backcourt and Max caught it before he was established in the front court. Backcourt violation.

Agree. It seemed like a no brainer call.

Tom

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

CHONGS · « **Reply #56 on:** February 12, 2025, 05:11:25 PM »

Hey squawks why don't you two go take a long hike off of a short pier.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #57 on:** February 12, 2025, 05:26:20 PM »

Quote from: KST8FAN on February 12, 2025, 12:04:09 PM

I need to find the video. I have a 30-year veteran official reviewing it for us.

I know from my coaching days before there is a back court violation the player and the ball have to be established in front court.

The classic scenario is a player dribbling steps one foot in front court while the ball and his other foot are still in back court. Then, fans and some coaches lose their crap when his front court foot comes back to back court. It's not over and back because both feet and the ball never got establish in front court.

I am reading a ball played in from out of bounds has no front or back court status, but I can't find what makes the ball status change.

Last night the ball was thrown in by Arizona from the baseline, caught by a Cat who clearly had both feet in front court then passed to a player clearly in the back court.

Tom

Sent from my SM-S916U using Tapatalk

The player was not established in the front court, but the ball never entered the back court.

schreds21 · « **Reply #58 on:** February 12, 2025, 08:06:04 PM »

What I saw was the KSU Kats beating Arizona Cats asses even after getting 4 points taken off the board by the dumbass refs so who gives a crap if they blew an over and back call in KSU Kats favor!

Stevesie60 · « **Reply #59 on:** February 12, 2025, 10:03:13 PM »

Quote from: CHONGS on February 12, 2025, 05:11:25 PM

Hey squawks why don't you two go take a long hike off of a short pier.

lol

Sandstone Outcropping · « **Reply #60 on:** February 14, 2025, 02:03:44 PM »

Has there ever been a guard better than Dug McDaniel at using the backboard?

michigancat · « **Reply #61 on:** February 14, 2025, 05:17:57 PM »

Quote from: Sandstone Outcropping on February 14, 2025, 02:03:44 PM

Has there ever been a guard better than Dug McDaniel at using the backboard?

Nope. Especially when only touching it with one hand!

mocat · « **Reply #62 on:** February 18, 2025, 09:30:42 AM »

Quote from: michigancat on February 11, 2025, 09:47:04 PM

Quote from: mocat on February 11, 2025, 09:38:05 PM
Quote from: CNS on February 11, 2025, 09:32:53 PM
I guess we should probably just win out.
I can't even describe to you how confident I am that we will lose the next 2
Lol yes

alright now back to work. 4-1 finish down the stretch coming right up!

Sandstone Outcropping · « **Reply #63 on:** February 18, 2025, 10:27:54 AM »

Quote from: mocat on February 18, 2025, 09:30:42 AM

Quote from: michigancat on February 11, 2025, 09:47:04 PM
Quote from: mocat on February 11, 2025, 09:38:05 PM
Quote from: CNS on February 11, 2025, 09:32:53 PM
I guess we should probably just win out.
I can't even describe to you how confident I am that we will lose the next 2
Lol yes

alright now back to work. 4-1 finish down the stretch coming right up!

Could still make it in with 18 or 19 wins, right?

EMAWzifried · « **Reply #64 on:** February 18, 2025, 12:32:41 PM »

No more regular season lossess and two or three wins in KC, and maybe.

ChiComCat · « **Reply #65 on:** February 18, 2025, 12:41:09 PM »

A win out and one in KC would make me confident. We have some very nice wins, just need to stack some more of them.

Kid In the Hall · « **Reply #66 on:** February 18, 2025, 12:57:25 PM »

Prior to last night's game, the announcers were viewing it as a must win, but Lunardi disagreed and said a win would "keep K-State on the path of making the tourney"

I interpret that to mean that if we win out in the regular season and snag 1-2 wins in the Big 12 tourney, we'd be more likely than not to be in.

cfbandyman · « **Reply #67 on:** February 18, 2025, 01:01:32 PM »

Yeah, I felt winning either game basically slightly helps us, winning both would've been huge, losing both slightly hurts. Definitely gotta win out or at least be 4-1. Then probably 1 maybe 2 in KC.

wetwillie · « **Reply #68 on:** February 18, 2025, 06:14:46 PM »

No at large team in the last three years has received a bid with more than 14 total losses. If you view 14 losses as the max, you have to go 5-0 down the stretch or win the B12 tournament.

CNS · « **Reply #69 on:** February 18, 2025, 06:42:19 PM »

I think if we win out the season, we are in.

meow meow · « **Reply #70 on:** February 19, 2025, 10:32:22 AM »

i like how people are seriously talking about going 5-0 after these last 2 games. equally as funny as the people talking about the 9 different things that needed to happen the last week or 2 of football for the cats to get in the big 12 title game.

pissclams · « **Reply #71 on:** February 19, 2025, 10:51:56 AM »

most likely: beat arizona st, ucf, and colorado at home. lose at cinci and lose at home against iowa state

finish season at 16-15, 10-10

pissclams · « **Reply #72 on:** February 19, 2025, 10:54:09 AM »

next most likely: beat iowa state and cincinnati

lose to: colorado, arizona state, ucf

CNS · « **Reply #73 on:** February 19, 2025, 01:37:43 PM »

Quote from: meow meow on February 19, 2025, 10:32:22 AM

i like how people are seriously talking about going 5-0 after these last 2 games. equally as funny as the people talking about the 9 different things that needed to happen the last week or 2 of football for the cats to get in the big 12 title game.

Whoa whoa, not saying I think we are winning out. Saying that if we do so, I think we make the tournament.

ChiComCat · « **Reply #74 on:** February 19, 2025, 01:43:04 PM »

Quote from: CNS on February 19, 2025, 01:37:43 PM

Quote from: meow meow on February 19, 2025, 10:32:22 AM
i like how people are seriously talking about going 5-0 after these last 2 games. equally as funny as the people talking about the 9 different things that needed to happen the last week or 2 of football for the cats to get in the big 12 title game.

Whoa whoa, not saying I think we are winning out. Saying that if we do so, I think we make the tournament.

Agreed. I don't think anybody expects it, just stating what they believe is required. I expect 3-2 followed by an optimistic 2-1 in the B12 followed by K-State trying to tell everyone we somehow got screwed when we're left out.