I'm a sunshine pumper but I am concerned that Haggerty has a really high TOr as a shooting guard but we're moving him to point guard. That being said the comparison to Tylor Perry is a bit foolish, for multiple reasons.
1. Haggerty is a better shooting guard
2. Haggerty plays completely different than Tylor did. Haggerty does get to the rim, in fact he's elite at it, probably the best in the nation. He's a developing 3 point shooter. Tylor was the opposite, he was a driveway shooter that we needed to get better at penetrating defenses. Tylor only took 94 2 point shots his senior year, Haggerty took 414 2 point shots last year. Tylor was really good at drawing fouls and getting to the line. He drew 4.5 fouls every 40 minutes and shot 176 FTs. Haggerty drew 6.1 fouls every 40 minutes and shot 274 FTs. He made 48 more FTs than Tylor shot his senior year.
Also you must be Mandela Effecting Tylor's senior year, because he was way better than you are making him out to be. His Offensive rating was 111.0, Markquis's was 111.3 his senior year. Steals, assists, and 2 pt FGs made were the only stats in which Markquis was noticeably better in. Markquis has the Big 12 record for assists* in a season and the NCAA Tournament record for assists in a game, there is no shame in not being a better passer than Markquis.
Apologies, he ended up two assists short of the Big 12 season record, 297 to Gottlieb's 299.
