Question for stunted and wacky that i want to ask now…
If tang has a similar performance as last years team does tang get credit for achieving the same result as oscar even though he will be working with substantially less talent? In my mind if you can achieve the same result as someone with much better talent, then that would either make you an overachiever or the other guy with all the talent an underachiever. But oscar won the most conference titles of anyone since like the 70s, plus he also went to the elite 8, so I mean…really not possible that he was an underachiever he was clearly our greatest achiever OAT.
I’m assuming the less talent talking point to be canon since the two of you have spent so much energy focusing on how much less talent we will have next year as compared to this past season. Thanks in advance for your insights