Possible WW3 thread

[wetwillie]

1% success rate is still 50+ nukes

That's a lot of washing machines

[CNS]

I don't have a good grasp on the physicality of a nuke.  Can you strap one to an inmate's back, and if so, could they run with that on them?

[Sandstone Outcropping]

Home of known pederast and darling of the pro-Putin far right raided by the FBI

https://www.foxnews.com/us/fbi-raids-new-york-home-former-un-weapons-inspector-scott-ritter-ongoing-federal-investigation

[Dugout DickStone]

I don't have a good grasp on the physicality of a nuke.  Can you strap one to an inmate's back, and if so, could they run with that on them?

Is the inmate a convicted sex offender?

[Woogy]

I don't have a good grasp on the physicality of a nuke.  Can you strap one to an inmate's back, and if so, could they run with that on them?

They were developed by both sides in the 60's. There was a large mortar-type round that required a special tube to launch, and the backpack types that required a small squad to carry several components individually.  Both were very small yields - a small fraction, maybe 10% or less, of Hiroshima/Nagasaki - meant more for behind the front infrastructure and C3 disruption.

The actual nuke fuel would degrade very rapidly, making the weapon a dirty bomb with not much explosive destruction.  But very, very expensive to maintain the nuke components.

Modern explosives are far less hassle and more concealable; stand-off weapons are more versatile. 

[Stupid Fitz]

I don't have a good grasp on the physicality of a nuke.  Can you strap one to an inmate's back, and if so, could they run with that on them?

They were developed by both sides in the 60's. There was a large mortar-type round that required a special tube to launch, and the backpack types that required a small squad to carry several components individually.  Both were very small yields - a small fraction, maybe 10% or less, of Hiroshima/Nagasaki - meant more for behind the front infrastructure and C3 disruption.

The actual nuke fuel would degrade very rapidly, making the weapon a dirty bomb with not much explosive destruction.  But very, very expensive to maintain the nuke components.

Modern explosives are far less hassle and more concealable; stand-off weapons are more versatile.

MODS!!!! MODS!!!!

[CNS]

I don't have a good grasp on the physicality of a nuke.  Can you strap one to an inmate's back, and if so, could they run with that on them?

Is the inmate a convicted sex offender?

If it makes them more energetic, it would probably be a good idea.

[sonofdaxjones]

Keep it going . . . #neocongE




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[LickNeckey]

Russia flexing their first world muscles in Kursk...

would probably be better off with Toyotas and RPG's

[Dugout DickStone]

Russia flexing their first world muscles in Kursk...

would probably be better off with Toyotas and RPG's

Less freed convicted pedophiles

[wetwillie]

Russia has to be down to the bottom of the barrel of troops. Wouldn't be surprised if they are sending kids under 18.

[Dugout DickStone]

Sending your good stuff to Iran and Hezbollah was a bad idea

[sys]

learning.  copying.  adapting.

https://x.com/RALee85/status/1824151480800084337

[ben ji]

I don't have a good grasp on the physicality of a nuke.  Can you strap one to an inmate's back, and if so, could they run with that on them?

They were developed by both sides in the 60's. There was a large mortar-type round that required a special tube to launch, and the backpack types that required a small squad to carry several components individually.  Both were very small yields - a small fraction, maybe 10% or less, of Hiroshima/Nagasaki - meant more for behind the front infrastructure and C3 disruption.

The actual nuke fuel would degrade very rapidly, making the weapon a dirty bomb with not much explosive destruction.  But very, very expensive to maintain the nuke components.

Modern explosives are far less hassle and more concealable; stand-off weapons are more versatile.

I used to work with a guy who was stationed in West Germany in the 80's. He told me that in the event of a Soviet invasion his unit's job was to helicopter people into certain locations in the fulda gap with a nuke in a backpack. They would land in places where they had drilled shafts into the ground/mountains and drop nukes down them therefore "closing" the fulda gap all within 30 minutes.

I thought he was rough ridin' insane until I googled it and yup....that was a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulda_Gap

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_demolition_munition

[LickNeckey]

Dax do you think Putin will surrender or let all of his troops do it first?

[Dugout DickStone]

I don't have a good grasp on the physicality of a nuke.  Can you strap one to an inmate's back, and if so, could they run with that on them?

They were developed by both sides in the 60's. There was a large mortar-type round that required a special tube to launch, and the backpack types that required a small squad to carry several components individually.  Both were very small yields - a small fraction, maybe 10% or less, of Hiroshima/Nagasaki - meant more for behind the front infrastructure and C3 disruption.

The actual nuke fuel would degrade very rapidly, making the weapon a dirty bomb with not much explosive destruction.  But very, very expensive to maintain the nuke components.

Modern explosives are far less hassle and more concealable; stand-off weapons are more versatile.

I used to work with a guy who was stationed in West Germany in the 80's. He told me that in the event of a Soviet invasion his unit's job was to helicopter people into certain locations in the fulda gap with a nuke in a backpack. They would land in places where they had drilled shafts into the ground/mountains and drop nukes down them therefore "closing" the fulda gap all within 30 minutes.

I thought he was rough ridin' insane until I googled it and yup....that was a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulda_Gap

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_demolition_munition

The Fulda gap a term Cold War kids knew - not really what it was but it was a thing.  I remember my buddies big brothers cominghome from Europe or basic whatever and it was used as they sat in garage crushing pull tab beers and smoking darts

[sonofdaxjones]

Dax do you think Putin will surrender or let all of his troops do it first?

Why are you asking me?

You’re very fixated on me. 

It’s very weird


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[LickNeckey]

i deeply value your perspective as our expert on first world armies and kremlin talking points

[sonofdaxjones]

For simple brained people - everything they don't like is a "Kremlin Talking Point".

Lick and his fellow #neocons/NewMcCarthyites are a simple, yet entertaining people.

Bushian level thinkers us/them, for us/against us

[Dugout DickStone]

https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1825553875757158704?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1825553875757158704%7Ctwgr%5E2eda2de439241334acd3a023d959f60aa47a168c%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgoemaw.com%2Fforum%2Findex.php%3Ftopic%3D41201.9625

[wetwillie]

Tucker C will be on the first thing smoking

[Dugout DickStone]

Tucker C will be on the first thing smoking

If he had a dick he would but I have some news about that.

[sonofdaxjones]

What does Vlad Putin’s proclamation have to do with this thread?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[LickNeckey]

Why would conservatives be interested in a country that can't secure its own border...

[Tobias]

they'll have an active role supporting that in Kursk, where they totally won't get sent