Possible WW3 thread

[Spracne]

It's possible. I usually speed read this board and skip over a lot of posts.

[sonofdaxjones]

It's possible. I usually speed read this board and skip over a lot of posts.

So you just respond based on what the other #blueanonGe deflectobots are saying?

Makes sense given the extreme group think among the resident community

[Spracne]

It's possible. I usually speed read this board and skip over a lot of posts.

So you just respond based on what the other #blueanonGe deflectobots are saying?

Makes sense given the extreme group think among the resident community

I just wait for steve dave to opine and then parrot whatever he says.

[sonofdaxjones]

It's possible. I usually speed read this board and skip over a lot of posts.

So you just respond based on what the other #blueanonGe deflectobots are saying?

Makes sense given the extreme group think among the resident community

I just wait for steve dave to opine and then parrot whatever he says.

That explains the inability to track nuance

This is all falling in line now.

Thanks for this, spracs

[Spracne]

It's possible. I usually speed read this board and skip over a lot of posts.

So you just respond based on what the other #blueanonGe deflectobots are saying?

Makes sense given the extreme group think among the resident community

I just wait for steve dave to opine and then parrot whatever he says.

That explains the inability to track nuance

This is all falling in line now.

Thanks for this, spracs

message boarding is serious business.

[Dugout DickStone]

It's possible. I usually speed read this board and skip over a lot of posts.

So you just respond based on what the other #blueanonGe deflectobots are saying?

Makes sense given the extreme group think among the resident community

I just wait for steve dave to opine and then parrot whatever he says.

You are the dax to sd's wacky

[Woogy]

Overlay the chart from the GDP thread on this.  Guns or Butter.

[Spracne]

It's possible. I usually speed read this board and skip over a lot of posts.

So you just respond based on what the other #blueanonGe deflectobots are saying?

Makes sense given the extreme group think among the resident community

I just wait for steve dave to opine and then parrot whatever he says.

You are the dax to sd's wacky

Trying to understand this. Are you saying Spracs:SD::Wacky:Dax?

[Dugout DickStone]

It's possible. I usually speed read this board and skip over a lot of posts.

So you just respond based on what the other #blueanonGe deflectobots are saying?

Makes sense given the extreme group think among the resident community

I just wait for steve dave to opine and then parrot whatever he says.

You are the dax to sd's wacky

Trying to understand this. Are you saying Spracs:SD::Wacky:Dax?

no, in that parroting scenario to would be Dax:Wacky

[Phil Titola]

There is nothing that infuriates dax more than when someone agrees with him lmfao

It really is a sight to behold. Like, he can't process the fact that someone might not be rough ridin' with or insulting him.

I mean when your whole schtick #onhere is just to make up crazy crap, not make any real points and then call people idiots for not following along with your nonsense. it tends to blow up his algorithm.

[wetwillie]

He called me a slobbering idiot, and while true, I find it to be a little bit hurtful.

[Kat Kid]

Dax and me are best buds in cat football, cat athletic budget, KU Karla and foreign policy. I appreciate Dax not following the blueanon agenda.

[sonofdaxjones]

There is nothing that infuriates dax more than when someone agrees with him lmfao

It really is a sight to behold. Like, he can't process the fact that someone might not be rough ridin' with or insulting him.

I mean when your whole schtick #onhere is just to make up crazy crap, not make any real points and then call people idiots for not following along with your nonsense. it tends to blow up his algorithm.

The issue you have is that you have no tolerance for any deviation from your political dogma. 

It’s now to the point that your only response is Facebook/Tucker Carlson or some bullshit anecdotal story.

Now, please tell me in this specific thread what I posted that’s made up.   Give it a try.

[Phil Titola]

Dax hand to God I have no idea what 90% of your posts even are hinting at saying.  75% are just calling out "dogma" of others or some "obama did this" kookie stuff.

[CHONGS]

I understand the isolationist position, and am quite sympathetic to it by nature of my political positions.

But I can't be so absolute about it and can see reasonable reasons for military action. I also don't think there's much point in a conversation about it here.  I believe the well has already been poisoned.

[Sandstone Outcropping]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/ukraine-crisis-handle-with-care-biden-russia-putin-george-h-w-bush-kyiv-speech-invasion-nuclear-weapons-proliferation-11643322589

[sonofdaxjones]

Dax and me are best buds in cat football, cat athletic budget, KU Karla and foreign policy. I appreciate Dax not following the blueanon agenda.

#thumbs

[sonofdaxjones]

I understand the isolationist position, and am quite sympathetic to it by nature of my political positions.

But I can't be so absolute about it and can see reasonable reasons for military action. I also don't think there's much point in a conversation about it here.  I believe the well has already been poisoned.

Sadly the Russophobes/NeoCon’s apparently still dominating inside the beltway.   Have conned a huge segment of our population into believing that anything less than direct military intervention is isolationism.

[MakeItRain]

I think the same about you. 

Particularly when you come slobbering in late to the discussion.   Like now.

No I’m serious you are winning this thread big time.  I’m really surprised at some of the stances being taken in this thread and who is taking them.

I'm interested in reading an expansion of this thought.

I think chum1 has successfully trolled me so probably much ado about nothing.  Im a little surprised by your stance but you have said you may be a bit bias based on personal relationships with folks that would be directly impacted in Ukraine.

I feel like my stance is the most humane and considerate of the most people. If Russia crosses the border, push them back, the end.

[LickNeckey]

I understand the isolationist position, and am quite sympathetic to it by nature of my political positions.

But I can't be so absolute about it and can see reasonable reasons for military action. I also don't think there's much point in a conversation about it here.  I believe the well has already been poisoned.

Sadly the Russophobes/NeoCon’s apparently still dominating inside the beltway.   Have conned a huge segment of our population into believing that anything less than direct military intervention is isolationism.

Is there a point in which you feel that the international community should check Russian expansion into sovereign nations?

[Spracne]

I understand the isolationist position, and am quite sympathetic to it by nature of my political positions.

But I can't be so absolute about it and can see reasonable reasons for military action. I also don't think there's much point in a conversation about it here.  I believe the well has already been poisoned.

Sadly the Russophobes/NeoCon’s apparently still dominating inside the beltway.   Have conned a huge segment of our population into believing that anything less than direct military intervention is isolationism.

Is there a point in which you feel that the international community should check Russian expansion into sovereign nations?

You should know better than to ask Dax a pointed question like that.

[sonofdaxjones]

How would the U.S. react if Mexico entered into a military alliance with China?   Then started letting China build military bases and surveillance platforms in Northern Mexico?

Then lets say that a drug cartel got really out of control (who was getting their chemicals from rogue Chinese companies while other Chinese actors - possibly even Chinese intelligence washed their money) and was armed to the teeth and was murdering all kinds of people on both sides of the border while funneling tons of illegal drugs into the United States distributed across a vast network of cartel member/gangs in U.S. cities.    The U.S. wants to cut off the head of the snake, but an attack on Mexico, even a drug lord compound is considered by the Chinese, to also be an attack on China.

Well, we'd absolutely lose our crap right from the start of any such overtures between Mexico and China. 

So why is anyone the least bit surprised that Russia is reacting they way they are? 

[chum1]

We should just go ahead and annex Mexico now before all of that happens.

[sonofdaxjones]

We should just go ahead and annex Mexico now before all of that happens.

I know you're an amazingly bad troller.

But the Chinese chemical supplies and the Chinese money laundering for the cartels is already happening.

[chum1]

But the Chinese chemical supplies and the Chinese money laundering for the cartels is already happening.

I take it we are absolutely losing our crap over this.

How would the U.S. react if Mexico entered into a military alliance with China? 
...
Well, we'd absolutely lose our crap right from the start of any such overtures between Mexico and China.