Author Topic: Supreme Court Cases Thread  (Read 52344 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56698
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1050 on: April 26, 2024, 11:39:10 AM »
Dark Brandon would absolutely go off.  imagine him crushing eric and kushner just for giggles

See above if you want to understand what Team Locked and Loaded aka The MAGA Blasters fantasize about . . .

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37557
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1051 on: April 26, 2024, 11:45:21 AM »
If Trump gets found guilty, he's realistically looking at a fine and probation. Maybe house arrest, depending on which trials he loses. Better get the supreme court to make sure that doesn't happen.

guilt/innocence, sentencing . . . I am not talking about any of those things.

amazing . . .

What is it about legal action that you are trying to imagine a president constantly fearing?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56698
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1052 on: April 26, 2024, 11:52:22 AM »
If Trump gets found guilty, he's realistically looking at a fine and probation. Maybe house arrest, depending on which trials he loses. Better get the supreme court to make sure that doesn't happen.

guilt/innocence, sentencing . . . I am not talking about any of those things.

amazing . . .

What is it about legal action that you are trying to imagine a president constantly fearing?

By my observation it is appears that our #blueanon stronghold DOJ is wanting the unilateral power to declare at their discretion when a Presidents actions are official acts or private acts.


Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37557
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1053 on: April 26, 2024, 11:55:02 AM »
If Trump gets found guilty, he's realistically looking at a fine and probation. Maybe house arrest, depending on which trials he loses. Better get the supreme court to make sure that doesn't happen.

guilt/innocence, sentencing . . . I am not talking about any of those things.

amazing . . .

What is it about legal action that you are trying to imagine a president constantly fearing?

By my observation it is appears that our #blueanon stronghold DOJ is wanting the unilateral power to declare at their discretion when a Presidents actions are official acts or private acts.

I believe that discretion would ultimately fall on the shoulders of a jury.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22569
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1054 on: April 26, 2024, 01:01:31 PM »
Imagine a world where you try to overturn a democratic election and, failing that, organize a crappy coup to "fight like hell" as a last resort to hold onto power ...
Tapatalk-only users have small wangs that they use on their mommas. #Pete2028

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30207
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1055 on: April 26, 2024, 01:27:38 PM »
Theocracy

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37557
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1056 on: April 26, 2024, 02:43:11 PM »
Imagine a world where you try to overturn a democratic election and, failing that, organize a crappy coup to "fight like hell" as a last resort to hold onto power ...

And then imagine that the DOJ tries to claim that you weren't operating within your official capacity as president while trying to overthrow the election results for your own personal enrichment. How could a president even operate with those types of constraints?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56698
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1057 on: April 26, 2024, 03:26:03 PM »
Imagine a world where you try to overturn a democratic election and, failing that, organize a crappy coup to "fight like hell" as a last resort to hold onto power ...
Imagine a world where #blueanon forgets they sent in squadrons of lawyers to overturn a presidential election. Years later then engage in election outcome: Denialism, delegitimization and ascribe to every insane conspiracy theory imaginable in order to undermine a presidency, with seeds planted by the election outcome denialism and the claim of an illegitimate presidency.

#thumbsup


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56698
    • View Profile
Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1058 on: April 26, 2024, 03:27:38 PM »
Quote
I believe that discretion would ultimately fall on the shoulders of a jury.

At the prodding of a fascistic DOJ using legal selectivism against a perceived political enemy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
« Last Edit: April 26, 2024, 03:48:59 PM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12498
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1059 on: April 26, 2024, 03:38:03 PM »
 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Dax wasn't quite satisfied with his first post, probably set his phone down and got half way to the kitchen and thought...I'M NOT DONE and pounded out a second quoted post
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56698
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1060 on: April 26, 2024, 03:45:27 PM »
Some people who are perpetually enraged because people they don’t  like post in this board often lose track and are confused by the quote/reply features.

Certain psychos only want collective groupthink on his blog!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20886
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1061 on: April 26, 2024, 03:58:22 PM »
Imagine a world where you try to overturn a democratic election and, failing that, organize a crappy coup to "fight like hell" as a last resort to hold onto power ...
Imagine a world where #blueanon forgets they sent in squadrons of lawyers to overturn a presidential election. Years later then engage in election outcome: Denialism, delegitimization and ascribe to every insane conspiracy theory imaginable in order to undermine a presidency, with seeds planted by the election outcome denialism and the claim of an illegitimate presidency.

#thumbsup


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hold on, who was suing  who in Bush v Gore? Doesn’t the plaintiff get listed first?

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 66053
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1062 on: April 26, 2024, 04:00:02 PM »
Some people who are perpetually enraged because people they don’t  like post in this board often lose track and are confused by the quote/reply features.

Certain psychos only want collective groupthink on his blog!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You really going to leave this up after you had to edit your post?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56698
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1063 on: April 26, 2024, 04:12:19 PM »
Some people who are perpetually enraged because people they don’t  like post in this board often lose track and are confused by the quote/reply features.

Certain psychos only want collective groupthink on his blog!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You really going to leave this up after you had to edit your post?

Yes, I don't have low self esteem like you do.


Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 66053
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1064 on: April 26, 2024, 04:16:09 PM »
So you quoted a post twice, then tbt made a joke about it, then you say tbt doesn't understand the quote function, then you noticed you actually don't understand the quote system, then edited it to the correct quote, and then claim this is somehow related to you not having low self esteem?

Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56698
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1065 on: April 26, 2024, 04:18:53 PM »
Imagine a world where you try to overturn a democratic election and, failing that, organize a crappy coup to "fight like hell" as a last resort to hold onto power ...
Imagine a world where #blueanon forgets they sent in squadrons of lawyers to overturn a presidential election. Years later then engage in election outcome: Denialism, delegitimization and ascribe to every insane conspiracy theory imaginable in order to undermine a presidency, with seeds planted by the election outcome denialism and the claim of an illegitimate presidency.

#thumbsup


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hold on, who was suing  who in Bush v Gore? Doesn’t the plaintiff get listed first?

You left out a few dozen lawsuits




Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12498
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1066 on: April 26, 2024, 04:19:04 PM »
incredible

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56698
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1067 on: April 26, 2024, 04:20:20 PM »
So you quoted a post twice, then tbt made a joke about it, then you say tbt doesn't understand the quote function, then you noticed you actually don't understand the quote system, then edited it to the correct quote, and then claim this is somehow related to you not having low self esteem?

Why are you ragebots, who are pissed off because I post here so anal?


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56698
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1068 on: April 26, 2024, 04:23:20 PM »

Online BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7041
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1069 on: April 26, 2024, 08:14:13 PM »
Wait so now bush is blueanon?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56698
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1070 on: April 26, 2024, 09:13:40 PM »
It’s just amazing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22569
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1071 on: April 27, 2024, 10:15:39 AM »
Wait so now bush is blueanon?

Disliking Trump = blueanon. Try to keep up, for once.
Tapatalk-only users have small wangs that they use on their mommas. #Pete2028

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56698
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1072 on: April 27, 2024, 10:49:48 AM »
It only becomes quasi #blueanon when the anti-Trump people  start being referenced and welcomed by hardcore #blueanon and/or they ascribe themselves to the multitude of whackadoo conspiracy theories that #blueanon believes to their core.

The most fascinating ones to date are people like mega NeoCon’s like Bill Kristol and Liz Cheney.

But back to Bush and elections - It’s not even hinted by me that Bush was #blueanon back then.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22569
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1073 on: April 27, 2024, 11:19:57 AM »
Cool. I'll leave you to build your little Minecraft realm.
Tapatalk-only users have small wangs that they use on their mommas. #Pete2028

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56698
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #1074 on: April 27, 2024, 11:29:57 AM »
#perpetualcringeblogkaren is hormonal (again) today


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk