Author Topic: Supreme Court Cases Thread  (Read 34965 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6709
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #375 on: June 25, 2022, 10:06:46 AM »
Mea culpa but the reason I’m mad about this decision is because I just absolutely love killing babies. I absolutely love it. 2-3 times a year me and mrs BAC have lots of mutual sex so she can get knocked up and we can barely keep ourselves from skipping with glee to the clinic to murder the crap out of that baby. I assume this is how pretty much everyone is right? Tough day for us millions upon millions of baby murder enthusiasts

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13592
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #376 on: June 25, 2022, 10:07:36 AM »
Are there any, like conservative groups dancing in the streets or something anywhere in the country? I sure didn't see any of my conservative relatives or friends celebrating on social media. They were just kinda acting like nothing happened. Strange.

Makes sense bc abortions will still be happening in very high numbers

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30577
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #377 on: June 25, 2022, 10:09:52 AM »
It sounds like scientists are getting really close to a male birth control that doesn’t inhibit testosterone and works in retinoic acid receptors. This would definitely help make a dent in unwanted pregnancies.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19870
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #378 on: June 25, 2022, 10:12:24 AM »
Freakenomics had a great episode on how crime dropped in the wake of ROE V Wade


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64260
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #379 on: June 25, 2022, 10:32:03 AM »
Did we survive the night of rage?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29386
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #380 on: June 25, 2022, 10:37:59 AM »
It sounds like scientists are getting really close to a male birth control that doesn’t inhibit testosterone and works in retinoic acid receptors. This would definitely help make a dent in unwanted pregnancies.
I think we should pass a law that rapists should have to take this drug.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85487
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #381 on: June 25, 2022, 10:50:40 AM »
Did we survive the night of rage?
Dax, please check in as safe

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #382 on: June 25, 2022, 10:52:14 AM »
Did we survive the night of rage?
Nope. BAC is still going. He’s an angry elf.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85487
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #383 on: June 25, 2022, 11:08:02 AM »

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #384 on: June 25, 2022, 11:12:37 AM »
BAC checking for the day:

https://twitter.com/cwt_news/status/1540514313491943428?s=21&t=ThatC1OrlmKUF_ZGW2ci2A


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51710
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #385 on: June 25, 2022, 11:29:42 AM »
The outright mourning from magas that no churches got burned is a weird ass phenomenon

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9505
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #386 on: June 25, 2022, 11:33:44 AM »
The outright mourning from magas that no churches got burned is a weird ass phenomenon

They want(ed) it sooooo bad
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6709
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #387 on: June 25, 2022, 11:52:09 AM »
Ya know wackster as much as your willfully ignorant piss ant clown boy schtick irritates me, I want you to know that despite all of that I do very sincerely hope that you and mrs wacky never find yourselves in a situation where you might wish you had the option. You have a kid so you should know that pregnancy is an incredibly risky process regardless of whether it’s wanted or not. If (god forbid) mrs wacky had a complication and she was going to die if the pregnancy wasn’t terminated, I have a hard time believing you would just say “welp! God works in mysterious ways good luck wifey!” before pulling out an oversized mallet and beating yourself over the head with it.

If you filled up BSFS with pregnant (white) women…statistically speaking 9 of them are going to die from complications related to their pregnancy. For black women, double it. To me that is more than enough reason that people should have this available as an option. I sure as crap hope I never need a root canal, and I would never get one just for shits and giggs, but I am very thankful that routine, safe medical procedure is available to me if I need it

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6709
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #388 on: June 25, 2022, 11:57:05 AM »
But please, continue with whatever you were saying, you rough ridin' photocopy of a photocopy of a Ben garrison comic strip

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #389 on: June 25, 2022, 12:05:13 PM »
My wife and I spent over $50,000 to be able to have a child. We value life. Stop 1%’ing cases to try and prove your point. Most cases are due to carelessness/laziness and dumb people having sex. Mostly libs!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6709
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #390 on: June 25, 2022, 12:19:25 PM »
The amount of money you spent to have a baby is completely irrelevant and what I should really focus my energy on is having an abortion on continuing to engage with complete downgrade chuds who have no interest in productive discourse because apparently being a shitposting edgelord brings them some measure of self validation I guess. I’m going to try my best to do better moving forward

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85487
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #391 on: June 25, 2022, 12:20:41 PM »
the bigots have been emboldened by their newfound political court. quiet part finally out from behind the curtain.

https://twitter.com/JohnCornyn/status/1540689961040482306

Offline wiley

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2186
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #392 on: June 25, 2022, 12:21:00 PM »
This is probably a question geared more towards people who have a background in medicine or law.  But I’ve read in the past that Eugenics/IVF could run into issues if roe v wade were ever overturned.  Is that a legitimate concern or more of a “in extreme cases someone will put a bill out that will never pass because it contains language banning IVF”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
it's easy to be emaw when EMAW is at your doorstep - FFF

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85487
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #393 on: June 25, 2022, 12:22:44 PM »

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9505
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #394 on: June 25, 2022, 12:52:18 PM »
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16705
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #395 on: June 25, 2022, 12:52:35 PM »
My wife and I spent over $50,000 to be able to have a child. We value life. Stop 1%’ing cases to try and prove your point. Most cases are due to carelessness/laziness and dumb people having sex. Mostly libs!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


This is rough ridin' hilarious. You know this ruling will very likely make IVF illegal in many, many states, right? Did you not know that, or are you just going to be an enormous hypocrite?
« Last Edit: June 25, 2022, 01:59:52 PM by SkinnyBenny »
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline dal9

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1782
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #396 on: June 25, 2022, 12:54:30 PM »
the bigots have been emboldened by their newfound political court. quiet part finally out from behind the curtain.

https://twitter.com/JohnCornyn/status/1540689961040482306

what he's actually trying to say here is that Brown also overruled Plessy after ~50 years, and that was good.  obviously a confusing way to put it.

Online wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30577
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #397 on: June 25, 2022, 12:58:06 PM »
1950s here we come!

https://twitter.com/kylegriffin1/status/1540339085230968834

Banning contraception and Outlawing abortion is certainly one way to grow the party’s base
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9505
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #398 on: June 25, 2022, 01:03:04 PM »
the bigots have been emboldened by their newfound political court. quiet part finally out from behind the curtain.

https://twitter.com/JohnCornyn/status/1540689961040482306

what he's actually trying to say here is that Brown also overruled Plessy after ~50 years, and that was good.  obviously a confusing way to put it.

The irony being though one improved rights, the other decreased it
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Online yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13252
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #399 on: June 25, 2022, 01:03:42 PM »
This thread has not disappointed


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk