Author Topic: capitol riot  (Read 127253 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36550
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2125 on: May 04, 2022, 03:36:06 PM »
How many members of one org have to be guilty of sedition, formally, before the govt will recognize that org as terrorist?  Real question.  Is there a threshold?  Like, is it three?  More?

I think they are universally thought of as obese blundering poors with zero skills.  Like, are you scared of a guy who has never seen a woman naked (irl)?

Those guys have lots of time on their hands to plan crap and make bombs and stuff.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2126 on: May 04, 2022, 08:51:17 PM »
How many members of one org have to be guilty of sedition, formally, before the govt will recognize that org as terrorist?  Real question.  Is there a threshold?  Like, is it three?  More?

I think they are universally thought of as obese blundering poors with zero skills.  Like, are you scared of a guy who has never seen a woman naked (irl)?

Bigger threat to their own ding dong

Those guys have lots of time on their hands to plan crap and make bombs and stuff.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2127 on: May 04, 2022, 08:58:28 PM »
Links? 

Imagine belonging to and supporting a political movement that’s absolutely terrified of tens upon tens of incels. 

#blueanon

Sad

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2128 on: May 05, 2022, 08:59:54 AM »
How many members of one org have to be guilty of sedition, formally, before the govt will recognize that org as terrorist?  Real question.  Is there a threshold?  Like, is it three?  More?

I think they are universally thought of as obese blundering poors with zero skills.  Like, are you scared of a guy who has never seen a woman naked (irl)?

Those guys have lots of time on their hands to plan crap and make bombs and stuff.

but also time to eat and watch internet prono so....guess which one they choose.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36550
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2129 on: May 05, 2022, 03:25:20 PM »
How many members of one org have to be guilty of sedition, formally, before the govt will recognize that org as terrorist?  Real question.  Is there a threshold?  Like, is it three?  More?

I think they are universally thought of as obese blundering poors with zero skills.  Like, are you scared of a guy who has never seen a woman naked (irl)?

Those guys have lots of time on their hands to plan crap and make bombs and stuff.

but also time to eat and watch internet prono so....guess which one they choose.

So, less than 3?  If so, I think we are there.   :dunno:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2130 on: May 12, 2022, 02:51:26 PM »
https://www.mediafire.com/file/exrj5k501pte4jq/Harrelson_Discovery_2022_05.pdf/file

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.239218/gov.uscourts.dcd.239218.127.2.pdf

Suspicious actors are seen on video “associating, conferring and traveling with others, engaging in behavior to confuse law enforcement through body masking, facial masking, clothing changes, and disorienting skirmishing behavior,” Geyer wrote.

The suspected people used earpieces, satellite phones, and other communication equipment. “Often it appears that these communications devices do not seem to be affected by capacity restriction or sophisticated jamming that was evident throughout the day,” Geyer wrote.

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6005
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2131 on: May 12, 2022, 03:12:05 PM »
Antifa or Deep State?

prolly Deep State

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2132 on: May 12, 2022, 03:16:01 PM »
How'd those Whitmer prosecutions work out, Lick?

Lick, I know you love being part of the movement that is The Man , but does it bother you at all that the Federal government appears to be a provocateur in some of these events?

Do you think the DOJ will properly comply with the motion?

Recall that Herr Garland, while looking a bit nervous refused to answer questions about government agents in the crowd during congressional hearings.








Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6005
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2133 on: May 12, 2022, 03:40:01 PM »
When you say the federal government was the provocateur are you talking about the sitting president or something else?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2134 on: May 12, 2022, 03:49:48 PM »
When you say the federal government was the provocateur are you talking about the sitting president or something else?

What is the Federal government being asked to respond to in the motion, Lick?

LickNecky:  Deflectobot

You also didn't answer any of the other questions, as expected.




Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2135 on: May 20, 2022, 10:34:50 AM »

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2136 on: May 20, 2022, 11:14:35 AM »
hand-written notes from former President Trump about information that he thought might be useful for the anticipated litigation."

You would think that rank and file #blueanon would understand litigating election results, given #blueanon's rich history in that domain.

Remember, our current White House spokesperson (among many) fits the textbook #blueanon definition of "Threat to our Democracy".    Having openly questioned the legitimacy of the results of multiple elections in these United States.




Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2137 on: May 20, 2022, 11:15:44 AM »
I really want to read those notes for the lols

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 20952
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2138 on: May 20, 2022, 01:22:30 PM »
hand-written notes from former President Trump about information that he thought might be useful for the anticipated litigation."

You would think that rank and file #blueanon would understand litigating election results, given #blueanon's rich history in that domain.

Remember, our current White House spokesperson (among many) fits the textbook #blueanon definition of "Threat to our Democracy".    Having openly questioned the legitimacy of the results of multiple elections in these United States.

Dax, do you know why the bolded and underlined part was added, in the thing you quoted?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2139 on: May 20, 2022, 01:34:00 PM »
Okay, well, does anything change Spracs?




Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 20952
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2140 on: May 20, 2022, 01:51:02 PM »
So, no?

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2141 on: May 20, 2022, 01:53:02 PM »
Okay, well, does anything change Spracs?

For the lols like this

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2142 on: May 20, 2022, 02:06:56 PM »
Did the jest and spirit of the article change, Spracs?

These are really easy questions




Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2143 on: May 20, 2022, 02:08:07 PM »
Okay, well, does anything change Spracs?

For the lols like this

The dude that can only gurgle out MAGA on occasion. 

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2144 on: May 20, 2022, 02:08:43 PM »
Did the jest and spirit of the article change, Spracs?

These are really easy questions

You really should have been a lawyer. Lmfao

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2145 on: May 20, 2022, 02:13:35 PM »
 :jerk: :jerk: :jerk:

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2146 on: May 20, 2022, 02:16:20 PM »
:jerk: :jerk: :jerk:

I think I get the jest of your post and it’s pure humiliation

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 52980
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2147 on: May 20, 2022, 02:18:46 PM »
Again, your unilateral declarations are just the cutest thing.

It's very . . . middle schoolish, but endearing




Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2148 on: May 20, 2022, 02:22:11 PM »
Again, your unilateral declarations are just the cutest thing.

It's very . . . middle schoolish, but endearing

Are you hitting on me?  I only like winners so not interested

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 20952
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: capitol riot
« Reply #2149 on: May 20, 2022, 02:30:10 PM »
Did the jest and spirit of the article change, Spracs?

These are really easy questions

First, lol at you posting jest all over the board today. Second, there is actually a salient point I'm driving at, but you naturally don't want to be part of a Socratic learning experience. Your loss.