Author Topic: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread  (Read 11363 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15571
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #100 on: October 14, 2020, 08:09:05 PM »
Weird projection.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59544
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #101 on: October 14, 2020, 08:28:16 PM »
Weird projection.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Low IQ response.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15571
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #102 on: October 14, 2020, 09:24:19 PM »
Weird projection.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Low IQ response.
Thanks for the clarification. That was my next guess.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59544
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #103 on: October 14, 2020, 09:26:53 PM »
Weird projection.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Low IQ response.
Thanks for the clarification. That was my next guess.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

IC it is your perpetually enraged movement engaged in the Handmaid's tale memes and the walking womb Haitian child trafficker talking points.

It's just a shame that you lack the intellectual capacity to understand that.   


Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #104 on: October 14, 2020, 10:14:09 PM »


reasons I found it cringey:

1) Seemed very staged
2) It's not impressive
3) Notes and preparation aren't weaknesses
4) Republicans jerking themselves off to it

1) Didn't seem so staged to the point of cringy? 
2) On a scale of 1-10 on impressive?  Maybe 6?  She was solid.
3) Fine but give her a tad of credit?
4) There wasn't a ton of jerking off.  Cruz maybe?  And that was cringe worthy.

nope

yep.  also why you're a doosh and not as smart as you think you are.  you're ignorant and blinded to the point where you can't be even the least bit partial or objective to an argument and won't even look at the other side.  sad.  it's why the pit sucks.

Hey man I listen and learn here all the time. Just this week sys pointed out a contradiction I had with regards to the Bernie/Biden relationship that made me stop and think and 33 and I had a nice conversation about freaking abortion of all things where I learned something about late term abortion statistics. I just don't need to go into more detail on how cringey I thought that stunt and the reaction was.

I actually wish we had more conservative/different points of view here, I always enjoy hearing from DQ, spracs, and whoever the hell else is willing to be civil while admitting they voted for Trump along with the moderates and libertarians and conmies
Point of clarification: I didn’t vote for trump

Uh, yeah. Neither did I. He knows that. He's just being a $!#*.

I didn't know that about either of you and I'm surprised by learning this.
Yeah I’ve been pretty open about it.  I voted for some third party idiot.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32514
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #105 on: October 14, 2020, 10:56:00 PM »


reasons I found it cringey:

1) Seemed very staged
2) It's not impressive
3) Notes and preparation aren't weaknesses
4) Republicans jerking themselves off to it

1) Didn't seem so staged to the point of cringy? 
2) On a scale of 1-10 on impressive?  Maybe 6?  She was solid.
3) Fine but give her a tad of credit?
4) There wasn't a ton of jerking off.  Cruz maybe?  And that was cringe worthy.

nope

yep.  also why you're a doosh and not as smart as you think you are.  you're ignorant and blinded to the point where you can't be even the least bit partial or objective to an argument and won't even look at the other side.  sad.  it's why the pit sucks.

Hey man I listen and learn here all the time. Just this week sys pointed out a contradiction I had with regards to the Bernie/Biden relationship that made me stop and think and 33 and I had a nice conversation about freaking abortion of all things where I learned something about late term abortion statistics. I just don't need to go into more detail on how cringey I thought that stunt and the reaction was.

I actually wish we had more conservative/different points of view here, I always enjoy hearing from DQ, spracs, and whoever the hell else is willing to be civil while admitting they voted for Trump along with the moderates and libertarians and conmies
Point of clarification: I didn’t vote for trump

Uh, yeah. Neither did I. He knows that. He's just being a $!#*.

I didn't know that about either of you and I'm surprised by learning this.
Yeah I’ve been pretty open about it.  I voted for some third party idiot.

What is Aleppo?
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #106 on: October 15, 2020, 01:10:57 AM »
did i just stumble upon an evan mcmullin eskimo bro?

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38008
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #107 on: October 15, 2020, 08:20:13 AM »
Handmaiden conservobitch needs to know her place (#metoo - Liberal women only)

I disagree, dax. I think calling your employee the n-word does create a hostile work environment.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59544
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #108 on: October 15, 2020, 08:28:52 AM »
Handmaiden conservobitch needs to know her place (#metoo - Liberal women only)

I disagree, dax. I think calling your employee the n-word does create a hostile work environment.
It’s fascinating to watch LiBots waffle between telling us about the complexity and nuances of our legal system and heralding the simplicity of it all with a singular sentence backed with zero depth nor a shred of detail.

Nice job

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38008
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #109 on: October 15, 2020, 08:31:25 AM »
Handmaiden conservobitch needs to know her place (#metoo - Liberal women only)

I disagree, dax. I think calling your employee the n-word does create a hostile work environment.
It’s fascinating to watch LiBots waffle between telling us about the complexity and nuances of our legal system and heralding the simplicity of it all with a singular sentence backed with zero depth nor a shred of detail.

Nice job

There really are no instances where calling someone the n-word is ok.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59544
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #110 on: October 15, 2020, 08:36:55 AM »
Handmaiden conservobitch needs to know her place (#metoo - Liberal women only)

I disagree, dax. I think calling your employee the n-word does create a hostile work environment.
It’s fascinating to watch LiBots waffle between telling us about the complexity and nuances of our legal system and heralding the simplicity of it all with a singular sentence backed with zero depth nor a shred of detail.

Nice job

There really are no instances where calling someone the n-word is ok.
That on a stand alone basis is true.  But that brings not a single detail of a legal case to the discussion.  If that’s the only strike Libs have against this nominee then just step aside and enjoy her swearing in.

Online Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38008
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #111 on: October 15, 2020, 08:39:07 AM »
Handmaiden conservobitch needs to know her place (#metoo - Liberal women only)

I disagree, dax. I think calling your employee the n-word does create a hostile work environment.
It’s fascinating to watch LiBots waffle between telling us about the complexity and nuances of our legal system and heralding the simplicity of it all with a singular sentence backed with zero depth nor a shred of detail.

Nice job

There really are no instances where calling someone the n-word is ok.
That on a stand alone basis is true.  But that brings not a single detail of a legal case to the discussion.  If that’s the only strike Libs have against this nominee then just step aside and enjoy her swearing in.

If it's true that calling someone the n-word is never ok, then there aren't going to be any details that suddenly make it ok.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59544
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #112 on: October 15, 2020, 08:51:42 AM »
Handmaiden conservobitch needs to know her place (#metoo - Liberal women only)

I disagree, dax. I think calling your employee the n-word does create a hostile work environment.
It’s fascinating to watch LiBots waffle between telling us about the complexity and nuances of our legal system and heralding the simplicity of it all with a singular sentence backed with zero depth nor a shred of detail.

Nice job

There really are no instances where calling someone the n-word is ok.
That on a stand alone basis is true.  But that brings not a single detail of a legal case to the discussion.  If that’s the only strike Libs have against this nominee then just step aside and enjoy her swearing in.

If it's true that calling someone the n-word is never ok, then there aren't going to be any details that suddenly make it ok.
That doesn’t tell me anything relative to what happens in a court of law.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #113 on: October 21, 2020, 10:15:28 PM »
The latest polls show 51% of Americans support her confirmation, which is kind of surprising

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #114 on: October 21, 2020, 10:25:47 PM »
The latest polls show 51% of Americans support her confirmation, which is kind of surprising
She's a very smart semi-attractive woman with no hint of scandal. Kavanaugh's dumb ass set her up for a slam dunk.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #115 on: October 21, 2020, 10:35:43 PM »
The latest polls show 51% of Americans support her confirmation, which is kind of surprising
She's a very smart semi-attractive woman with no hint of scandal. Kavanaugh's dumb ass set her up for a slam dunk.

Her support among Democrats has risen 18% to 32%.  I guess I’m surprised that’s happened given how she has been portrayed by prominent voices on the left.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16028
    • View Profile
Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #116 on: October 21, 2020, 10:45:42 PM »
The “left” critique of Amy was always half assed. Republicans wisely put up a woman that Dems would be unwilling to drag. Of course, I also think a smart female (even if extremely conservative) will end up siding with the liberal wing on more issues than Pubs anticipate.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #117 on: October 22, 2020, 01:03:27 AM »
she seems fine, really

are there any good opinions she has written? I like when they write good.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #118 on: October 22, 2020, 01:17:46 AM »
The latest polls show 51% of Americans support her confirmation, which is kind of surprising
She's a very smart semi-attractive woman with no hint of scandal. Kavanaugh's dumb ass set her up for a slam dunk.

Her support among Democrats has risen 18% to 32%.  I guess I’m surprised that’s happened given how she has been portrayed by prominent voices on the left.

What? How has she been portrayed and what prominent voices are you talking about? I haven't read or heard a single thing from a liberal that isn't simply questioning her record. It's you conservatives that insist on discussing things that are not at all relevant to how she applies jurisprudence.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #119 on: October 22, 2020, 01:19:26 AM »
The latest polls show 51% of Americans support her confirmation, which is kind of surprising
She's a very smart semi-attractive woman with no hint of scandal. Kavanaugh's dumb ass set her up for a slam dunk.

Her support among Democrats has risen 18% to 32%.  I guess I’m surprised that’s happened given how she has been portrayed by prominent voices on the left.

Sidenote, you say a lot of stupid crap. You pick your spots when you post, but my god your post to stupid crap ratio is really high.

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17051
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #120 on: October 22, 2020, 01:23:30 AM »
She seems like the mom that cooks spaghetti dinner for my hs football team, except for way smarter. Prob pretty great dem or pub.

 :gocho:

Basically an @DQ12 superhero.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #121 on: October 22, 2020, 01:54:49 AM »
She seems like the mom that cooks spaghetti dinner for my hs football team, except for way smarter. Prob pretty great dem or pub.

 :gocho:

Basically an @DQ12 superhero.

While you and others are fawning over this white woman, I'll just remind you that she holds the legal opinion that calling someone the word n-word at work doesn't constitute harassment.

Has Sonia Sotomayor's name ever been typed on this blog?

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17051
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #122 on: October 22, 2020, 02:08:03 AM »
She seems like the mom that cooks spaghetti dinner for my hs football team, except for way smarter. Prob pretty great dem or pub.

 :gocho:

Basically an @DQ12 superhero.

While you and others are fawning over this white woman, I'll just remind you that she holds the legal opinion that calling someone the word n-word at work doesn't constitute harassment.

Has Sonia Sotomayor's name ever been typed on this blog?

Lol.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #123 on: October 22, 2020, 05:06:33 AM »
She seems like the mom that cooks spaghetti dinner for my hs football team, except for way smarter. Prob pretty great dem or pub.

 :gocho:

Basically an @DQ12 superhero.

While you and others are fawning over this white woman, I'll just remind you that she holds the legal opinion that calling someone the word n-word at work doesn't constitute harassment.

Has Sonia Sotomayor's name ever been typed on this blog?

Lol.
I would like to read the opinion instead of just the meme spin headline. I can conceive of context where it shouldn't be harassment.


Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Amy Barrett Discussion Thread
« Reply #124 on: October 22, 2020, 05:13:43 AM »
Ok I read it. It's doesn't really say what has been claimed, but it was also very boring so I hate her now.