Please point a dummy like me to the portion of the report you are speaking about.
The portion highlighting FBI reform is apparently not that part...
Durham Report
Possible FBI Reform:
One possible way to provide additional scrutiny of politically sensitive investigations would be to identify, in advance, an official who is responsible for challenging the steps taken in the investigation. Stewart Baker proposes having a career position for a nonpartisan FBI agent or lawyer to challenge the FISA application and every other stage of the investigation. This would be done in investigations that pose partisan risk. In Baker's view the Attorney General, through the Supplemental Reforms Memorandum has already taken a good step in this direction by requiring that politically sensitive surveillance and search applications be reviewed by a special agent from a field office not involved in the investigation. Similarly, Adam Klein said that DOJ and FBI leaders should consider whether a regularized practice of internal red teaming in the most sensitive cases, whether within the FBI or in collaboration with attorneys at the National Security Division, could serve as an effective check on confirmation bias without unduly delaying time-sensitive applications. As a way to ensure full consideration of the issues in applications that may present very difficult -and vitally important -issues, we recommend that the Department seriously consider Bakers proposal for an official to challenge both a politically sensitive FISA application and other stages oft he investigation. "Nothing", former Attorney General Levi warned, "can more weaken the quality of life or more imperil the realization of the goals we all hold dear than our failure to make clear by words and deed that our law is not the instrument of partisan purpose."