0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/25/letter-no-hillary-clinton-cant-try-to-hide-2016-oppo-research-from-the-special-counsel/So much lying
There is a strong belief that the FEC agrees with the The Coolidge Reagan Foundation complaint to the FEC that the DNC/HFA misrepresented their payments funneled via Perkins Coie to Fusion as being for legal consultancy. In a very short period of time Durham's team will be able to obtain the letter outlining the FEC's findings. n Friday’s letter, Backer also highlighted Hillary for America and the DNC’s commitment in their settlement agreement with the FEC to “not further contest the Commission’s finding of probable cause to believe” that the political organizations had “falsely reported their payments through Perkins Coie to Fusion GPS as being for legal services.” In contrast, in the Sussmann case, Hillary for America and the DNC “are nevertheless asserting materials generated by Fusion GPS and provided to Perkins Coie are protected by attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine,” the letter stressed.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on April 27, 2022, 02:51:04 PMThere is a strong belief that the FEC agrees with the The Coolidge Reagan Foundation complaint to the FEC that the DNC/HFA misrepresented their payments funneled via Perkins Coie to Fusion as being for legal consultancy. In a very short period of time Durham's team will be able to obtain the letter outlining the FEC's findings. n Friday’s letter, Backer also highlighted Hillary for America and the DNC’s commitment in their settlement agreement with the FEC to “not further contest the Commission’s finding of probable cause to believe” that the political organizations had “falsely reported their payments through Perkins Coie to Fusion GPS as being for legal services.” In contrast, in the Sussmann case, Hillary for America and the DNC “are nevertheless asserting materials generated by Fusion GPS and provided to Perkins Coie are protected by attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine,” the letter stressed.Yes. I read that after having to chase down the links to the articles in the Twitter responses. (You should do a better job of linking to sources.) Was there a protective order in place? Were the documents ever made public? Do people ever settle civil proceedings to avoid spiraling costs? Is a letter from a non-party to the Court properly characterized as a "complaint"? What's your point, exactly?
Quote from: Spracne on April 27, 2022, 03:03:34 PMQuote from: sonofdaxjones on April 27, 2022, 02:51:04 PMThere is a strong belief that the FEC agrees with the The Coolidge Reagan Foundation complaint to the FEC that the DNC/HFA misrepresented their payments funneled via Perkins Coie to Fusion as being for legal consultancy. In a very short period of time Durham's team will be able to obtain the letter outlining the FEC's findings. n Friday’s letter, Backer also highlighted Hillary for America and the DNC’s commitment in their settlement agreement with the FEC to “not further contest the Commission’s finding of probable cause to believe” that the political organizations had “falsely reported their payments through Perkins Coie to Fusion GPS as being for legal services.” In contrast, in the Sussmann case, Hillary for America and the DNC “are nevertheless asserting materials generated by Fusion GPS and provided to Perkins Coie are protected by attorney-client privilege and work-product doctrine,” the letter stressed.Yes. I read that after having to chase down the links to the articles in the Twitter responses. (You should do a better job of linking to sources.) Was there a protective order in place? Were the documents ever made public? Do people ever settle civil proceedings to avoid spiraling costs? Is a letter from a non-party to the Court properly characterized as a "complaint"? What's your point, exactly?Well, first of all, I posted the exact link that I am quoting from. Your inability to use the Internet is not my problem. --> Dax, you posted the links after I already read them. I assume you, like me, pulled them from the Tweet replies.If you read the articles (and remember you claimed that you read them ) you would know that the FEC will be releasing a letter soon. --> I did read the articles, though they weren't exactly the beacon of impartial reporting. As to the allegedly forthcoming letter, I look forward to reading it with an open mind. Why would HFA/DNC be entering into a settlement agreement with the FEC relative to the Coolidge Reagan Foundations complaint if there was nothing to the complaint? --> This is precisely the point of FRE 404(b) objections. The inference of guilt is highly prejudicial, and the probative value of that evidence is tiny; however, if this is a bench trial, that matters less than in a jury trial. I will also remind you that the burdens of proof are not the same. People settle matters for any number of reasons. Was there an admission of guilt, dax? Is dealing with the FEC a particularly expensive litigious process? --> Yes. Lawyers are expensive, particularly specialized ones. Were the courts involved in that FEC finding? --> Was this a verdict or a settlement between the parties?The more Sussmann et. al. (--> there is only one defendant, here) push back, the more we can easily conclude that the parties (--> party) involved did in fact lead our DOJ with the aid of accomplices in the FBI on a wild goose chase of fabrications specifically to undermine the Presidency of Don Trump. --> That's certainly what the Trump-appointed special prosecutor wants to prove, within the bounds of procedural and evidentiary rules. Guess we'll see. With the aid of #blueanon political leaders who to this day have released none of the "evidence" they claimed they had and with the aid millions upon millions of #blueanon who have, stlll and will always believe these lies. --> This is not relevant to the legal case.
I will also remind you, Captain Pay-Attention, that I initially engaged you to dispute your bases for concluding prematurely that certain communications were not subject to attorney-client privilege. You've apparently decided to pivot away from that.
Hire protection Robby Mook.
Our Legal System is CORRUPT, our Judges (and Justices!) are highly partisan, compromised or just plain scared, our Borders are OPEN, our Elections are Rigged, Inflation is RAMPANT, gas prices and food costs are “through the roof,” our Military “Leadership” is Woke, our Country is going to HELL, and Michael Sussmann is not guilty,” Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social, the small conservative social networking site he founded.