0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: LickNeckey on December 11, 2019, 03:01:40 PMhttps://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/opinion/31bamford.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=C7DC4A3B54AA607C6B602C01BB132DA5&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALLThat's a fine opinion piece Lick, BTW who is arguing that the FISA situation shouldn't be changed? Did your guy change anything about FISA in the 8 years he was in office? No, in fact, he put the Patriot Act on Steroids, then weaponized the FISA process (along with the IRS and other agencies) against political enemies (while John Brennan was spying on Congress, btw, John Brennan voted for a communist for president, now LibBot Nation just loves the guy and hates Russia . . . with lots of LibBots supporting a presidential candidate who thought the Soviet Union and Communism is/was awesome, but the same Libs just hate Russia because OrangeMan Bad, that's how screwed up you guys are). Did Bush use FISA to spy on John Kerry? John Kerry, a man who had a persistent history of repudiation of U.S. foreign policy, who, arguably was providing aid and comfort to communists fighting at the behest of the Soviet Union against the United States. In addition John Kerry had multiple foreign business entanglements via family members with known communist regimes like Vietnam. The same John Kerry in pictures loving all over the Muslim Brotherhood as SOS and engaging in sedition later by directly contacting the Iranian government when he was not an authorized representative of the U.S. Gov't. Using LibBot logic, it appears that Kerry would have been the perfect candidate for a FISA based investigation both as a Senator, a presidential nominee and a private citizen. But alas, no weaponizaton of FISA against political opponents by Bush.
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/opinion/31bamford.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=C7DC4A3B54AA607C6B602C01BB132DA5&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALL
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on December 11, 2019, 04:04:51 PMQuote from: LickNeckey on December 11, 2019, 03:01:40 PMhttps://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/opinion/31bamford.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=C7DC4A3B54AA607C6B602C01BB132DA5&gwt=pay&assetType=REGIWALLThat's a fine opinion piece Lick, BTW who is arguing that the FISA situation shouldn't be changed? Did your guy change anything about FISA in the 8 years he was in office? No, in fact, he put the Patriot Act on Steroids, then weaponized the FISA process (along with the IRS and other agencies) against political enemies (while John Brennan was spying on Congress, btw, John Brennan voted for a communist for president, now LibBot Nation just loves the guy and hates Russia . . . with lots of LibBots supporting a presidential candidate who thought the Soviet Union and Communism is/was awesome, but the same Libs just hate Russia because OrangeMan Bad, that's how screwed up you guys are). Did Bush use FISA to spy on John Kerry? John Kerry, a man who had a persistent history of repudiation of U.S. foreign policy, who, arguably was providing aid and comfort to communists fighting at the behest of the Soviet Union against the United States. In addition John Kerry had multiple foreign business entanglements via family members with known communist regimes like Vietnam. The same John Kerry in pictures loving all over the Muslim Brotherhood as SOS and engaging in sedition later by directly contacting the Iranian government when he was not an authorized representative of the U.S. Gov't. Using LibBot logic, it appears that Kerry would have been the perfect candidate for a FISA based investigation both as a Senator, a presidential nominee and a private citizen. But alas, no weaponizaton of FISA against political opponents by Bush.i am sure that despite all of your obfuscation you are aware that Trump signed a FISA reauthorization act that actually diminished domestic privacy protections.
Lol, this might be my favorite daxlogic ever
It wasn't surveillance against a presidential campaign, so it's not surveillance I care about? Is that it?
Quote from: chum1 on December 12, 2019, 04:32:08 PMIt wasn't surveillance against a presidential campaign, so it's not surveillance I care about? Is that it?I know you’re a typical resident LibBot who smokes a ton of weed and thus can’t remember anything. But I’ve been talking about surveillance nation for a long time.
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on December 13, 2019, 07:08:02 AMQuote from: chum1 on December 12, 2019, 04:32:08 PMIt wasn't surveillance against a presidential campaign, so it's not surveillance I care about? Is that it?I know you’re a typical resident LibBot who smokes a ton of weed and thus can’t remember anything. But I’ve been talking about surveillance nation for a long time.With the other voices in your head or on this blog?
This thing ended just like every non-dumbass knew it would. Still very hilarious and satisfying though.
Good luck Durham. It took Charity Navigator 3 years to rate the CF because it was a mass of sub-charities and dotted line non profits corporations (drug cartels were taking notes)
This organization has earned a GuideStar's Platinum Seal of Transparency by voluntarily sharing the measures of progress and results they use to pursue their mission. Organizations earn Platinum Seals by selecting from a catalog of over 900 expert recognized metrics or by creating a new metric that best fits their work. This information is reported by the organization and displayed publicly on their GuideStar Nonprofit Profile. With over 1.6 million Nonprofit Profiles, 9 million annual visitors and over 200 data partners, GuideStar is the world's leading source of information about nonprofit organizations. A nonprofit itself, GuideStar is dedicated to providing better data for better decisions for a better world.