Author Topic: Jussie Smollet  (Read 11133 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 31583
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #375 on: April 02, 2019, 05:08:33 PM »
https://www.theroot.com/white-woman-admits-to-making-up-story-about-being-attac-1833742433

Yes, this is exactly like Smollet.

Let us know when they find out she paid the "attackers" and set the whole thing up to propagate her career.   I'll tune into TMZ to hear her side of the case (goes TMZ.com) nope . . . nothing. 

Filing a false police report:  Welcome to things that happen 1000's of times a day in the United States.






Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 28100
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #376 on: April 03, 2019, 01:00:05 AM »
https://www.theroot.com/white-woman-admits-to-making-up-story-about-being-attac-1833742433

Yes, this is exactly like Smollet.

Let us know when they find out she paid the "attackers" and set the whole thing up to propagate her career.   I'll tune into TMZ to hear her side of the case (goes TMZ.com) nope . . . nothing. 

Filing a false police report:  Welcome to things that happen 1000's of times a day in the United States.

None of that stuff is illegal. Thank you for agreeing with me that Smollet's celebrity worked against him.

As far as dlew's "eff'em all, jail'em all," philosophy goes, I don't agree with that either. I only agree with jail time if one of these reports leads to there being a specific person or persons directly affected by a false report or claim. I also think that police officers and prosecutors who use clearly tainted eye witness testimony or flawed evidence should face the same scrutiny. There really is no real deterrent to legal malpractice that leads to malicious prosecution and if you're truly interested in justice that simply cannot be the case. Gotta balance those scales.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 31583
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #377 on: April 03, 2019, 07:47:43 AM »
Lol, Smollet obstructed justice when he interfered in a police investigation by his ongoing intentional misleading of investigators. That’s a felony.

Smollet committed mail fraud, that’s a felony.

Smollet faced federal obstruction charges for lying to the FBI.  A felony.

Yep, exactly the same as filing a false police report. 






Offline wetwillie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21138
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #378 on: April 03, 2019, 09:30:06 AM »
I think it’s fine, he will suffer the penalty of shame and being shunned by his industry and community for a time and then if he decides to not be a crap human being anymore will rehab his image and be good.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 28100
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #379 on: April 03, 2019, 10:47:29 AM »
Lol, Smollet obstructed justice when he interfered in a police investigation by his ongoing intentional misleading of investigators. That’s a felony.

Smollet committed mail fraud, that’s a felony.

Smollet faced federal obstruction charges for lying to the FBI.  A felony.

Yep, exactly the same as filing a false police report.

I'm going to assume that you limited your reading about this to angry white guy twitter and this thread because he wasn't charged with any of those things. All 16 counts were disorderly conduct-false reporting.
https://www.cwbchicago.com/2019/03/exclusive-grand-jury-returns-16-felony.html?m=1
The only significant differences are that Jussie took the extra step on actually paying someone to kick his ass and the Chicago city attorney was much more aggressive in his/her pursuit of charges. You can make the claim that the woman in Quinzee put young bald black guys in the area in peril. There was never a time that white people in Chicago were in peril because of Jussie's accusation.

I'm sorry to you and, everyone else reading, for actually engaging you as we all know how this will end.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 36323
  • "Tacky" -Kietz
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #380 on: April 03, 2019, 10:56:35 AM »
The only significant differences are that Jussie took the extra step on actually paying someone to kick his ass and the Chicago city attorney was much more aggressive in his/her pursuit of charges. You can make the claim that the woman in Quinzee put young bald black guys in the area in peril. There was never a time that white people in Chicago were in peril because of Jussie's accusation.

There's another significant difference that is the root of the ire of those wanting Jussie imprisoned.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 31583
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #381 on: April 03, 2019, 10:58:32 AM »
Lol, Smollet obstructed justice when he interfered in a police investigation by his ongoing intentional misleading of investigators. That’s a felony.

Smollet committed mail fraud, that’s a felony.

Smollet faced federal obstruction charges for lying to the FBI.  A felony.

Yep, exactly the same as filing a false police report.

I'm going to assume that you limited your reading about this to angry white guy twitter and this thread because he wasn't charged with any of those things. All 16 counts were disorderly conduct-false reporting.
https://www.cwbchicago.com/2019/03/exclusive-grand-jury-returns-16-felony.html?m=1
The only significant differences are that Jussie took the extra step on actually paying someone to kick his ass and the Chicago city attorney was much more aggressive in his/her pursuit of charges. You can make the claim that the woman in Quinzee put young bald black guys in the area in peril. There was never a time that white people in Chicago were in peril because of Jussie's accusation.

I'm sorry to you and, everyone else reading, for actually engaging you as we all know how this will end.

No I read what former federal prosecutors had to say about it.  Thanks

But I appreciate how you are defending someone who lead critical police resources on a wild goose chase and was engaged in perpetrating what turned out to be a fraudulent hate crime.  Hate crimes are a federal offense . . . the former prosecutors said it would be a sticky area, but said Smollett could have faced Federal felony charges for faking a hate crime.   What also appears to be lost is that both local, state and Federal officials stood ready and quite willing to prosecute any actual perps of a real hate crime to the fullest extent the law would allow.    I also appreciate that you now equate police investigations as being wholly benign and not fraught with any potential danger to the officers and or citizens.

You have now made a false police report which was immediately retracted when just a modicum of pressure from authorities equal to a situation where Smollet repeatedly lied and mislead investigators over the course of days to propagate a falsehood and a fraud, and in doing so committed a laundry list of felonies.








Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 57149
  • #FireBradHill!
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #382 on: April 23, 2019, 10:29:33 AM »

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3845
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #383 on: April 23, 2019, 11:32:02 AM »
Lol, Smollet obstructed justice when he interfered in a police investigation by his ongoing intentional misleading of investigators. That’s a felony.

Smollet committed mail fraud, that’s a felony.

Smollet faced federal obstruction charges for lying to the FBI.  A felony.

Yep, exactly the same as filing a false police report.

actions such as these demand a legal response!!!

unless you are the leader of the free world...

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 57149
  • #FireBradHill!
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #384 on: May 28, 2019, 03:35:14 PM »
Did you guys know he was in the Mighty Ducks? :Wha: I’m watching D3 while working from home and I started looking up the casting for some of the mighty ducks movies and bang, right there.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2019, 04:14:34 PM by WackyCat08 »

Offline Brock Landers

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5777
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #385 on: May 28, 2019, 03:43:01 PM »
Yeah I think everyone already knew that, mainly after Googling "who the hell is Jussie Smollett"

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40927
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #386 on: May 28, 2019, 03:47:48 PM »
I didn't know that! Kinda surprising he was still on D3. pretty good for a franchise like that!

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 57149
  • #FireBradHill!
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #387 on: May 28, 2019, 03:53:28 PM »
He actually didn’t make it on D3, Just the first one, but still. :surprised:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 57149
  • #FireBradHill!
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #388 on: May 28, 2019, 03:56:53 PM »

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 57149
  • #FireBradHill!
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #389 on: May 28, 2019, 03:57:48 PM »
Yeah I think everyone already knew that, mainly after Googling "who the hell is Jussie Smollett"

Offline Brock Landers

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5777
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #390 on: May 28, 2019, 04:01:52 PM »
LOL

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 70704
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #391 on: May 28, 2019, 04:04:31 PM »
and jussie smollet explodes into my awareness

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15282
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #392 on: May 28, 2019, 04:06:35 PM »
wacky i did NOT know and appreciate the information

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 57149
  • #FireBradHill!
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #393 on: May 28, 2019, 04:12:36 PM »
 :thumbs: It's been a wild Tuesday.

Offline Ksuminnesotacat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 310
  • Being a Viking fan has its own issues
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #394 on: May 28, 2019, 04:19:31 PM »


Solid work Wacky!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Effort management sucks spell it out taserface!

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40247
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #395 on: May 28, 2019, 04:22:27 PM »
yeah I had no clue and also had no clue they made that many stupid mighty duck movies.

Offline wetwillie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21138
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #396 on: May 28, 2019, 04:42:51 PM »
Yeah I think everyone already knew that, mainly after Googling "who the hell is Jussie Smollett"

Shame on you for sitting on that choice morsel of info
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9480
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #397 on: May 28, 2019, 04:54:59 PM »
I too appreciate the factoid, but am confused why Wacky would lie about watching D3 at home just to drop it on us.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 57149
  • #FireBradHill!
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #398 on: May 28, 2019, 05:08:25 PM »
 :dunno: It was on HBO Family today. Man, the 3rd one is so lol bad.

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6361
    • View Profile
Re: Jussie Smollet
« Reply #399 on: May 28, 2019, 05:54:47 PM »
Did you guys know he was in the Mighty Ducks? :Wha: I’m watching D3 while working from home and I started looking up the casting for some of the mighty ducks movies and bang, right there.

 :lol: