Author Topic: Killing babies at 9 months  (Read 4922 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9646
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #275 on: February 04, 2019, 10:27:15 AM »
:lol: You legit said there was no way ppl would take advantage of late term abortions and all I did was provide some examples that sent you into a fit of rage. T's and P's, friend.

Laughing at your outlandish thread is not a fit of rage. Sorry that didn't come across right.

I don't get into abortion talks because of how crazy some get about the topic. You may have noticed I never posted my opinion of the topic.


Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 55120
  • #FireBradHill!
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #276 on: February 04, 2019, 10:29:14 AM »
Still didn't stop you from throwing yourself into the conversation while being a pompous ass hat, like you do with every thread. It's all good, Phil.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9646
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #277 on: February 04, 2019, 10:35:31 AM »
Still didn't stop you from throwing yourself into the conversation while being a pompous ass hat, like you do with every thread. It's all good, Phil.

So weird this is how you laser focus on me and how you take my posts. This is gE right?

Hint, I don't take any of this site serious. Let's just have a good time bud!

Online bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5572
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #278 on: February 11, 2019, 11:50:09 PM »

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 67273
  • SP? all of that--->
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #279 on: March 06, 2019, 08:17:37 PM »
lmao

?s=21


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 67273
  • SP? all of that--->
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #280 on: April 30, 2019, 08:49:33 AM »




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8206
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #281 on: April 30, 2019, 09:32:03 AM »
Classic Sparkle Queen.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 16206
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #282 on: May 15, 2019, 04:44:59 PM »
I find it a bit odd that the Georgia and Alabama laws haven't been discussed on here yet.  Pro-lifers, are these good or bad?  Most of our discussions have been hypothetical laws.  Now we have two examples.  Thoughts? 
@bentren

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 27954
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #283 on: May 15, 2019, 04:48:52 PM »
I find it a bit odd that the Georgia and Alabama laws haven't been discussed on here yet.  Pro-lifers, are these good or bad?  Most of our discussions have been hypothetical laws.  Now we have two examples.  Thoughts?

As a mild pro-lifer my wife and I have already had a "discussion" about what's going on here, Mrs. Dax is more pro-life and we disagree.  It's very very bad legislation IMO.

Also terrible treatment by the Pub majority of the Dem side of the aisle . . . just disgraceful.  I hope Ivey vetoes.



 

Back in the day I used to crank this song to annoy the old people, now I crank it to annoy the young people

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15513
  • Gucci Mane Book Reader
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #284 on: May 15, 2019, 04:58:54 PM »

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8206
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #285 on: May 15, 2019, 05:08:48 PM »
They say it’s designed for a court challenge, which is just idiotic, IMO. If your goal is to erode precedent stemming from Roe v. Wade you’re not gonna do it with something extreme out of the gate.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8206
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #286 on: May 15, 2019, 05:10:32 PM »
One thing I’m legitimately curious about though: people almost uniformly lump rape & incest together as exceptions to abortion laws. Rape is a pretty obvious one, but why is incest always right up there next to it? Is it only because there’s typically an element of rape in incest situations?

Online Ksuminnesotacat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 127
  • Being a Viking fan has its own issues
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #287 on: May 15, 2019, 05:38:09 PM »
One thing I’m legitimately curious about though: people almost uniformly lump rape & incest together as exceptions to abortion laws. Rape is a pretty obvious one, but why is incest always right up there next to it? Is it only because there’s typically an element of rape in incest situations?

I would guess yes and certainly abuse that would be abhorrent.
Effort management sucks spell it out taserface!

Online 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16034
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #288 on: May 15, 2019, 06:08:56 PM »
I find it a bit odd that the Georgia and Alabama laws haven't been discussed on here yet.  Pro-lifers, are these good or bad?  Most of our discussions have been hypothetical laws.  Now we have two examples.  Thoughts?


:don'tcare:

Could go in the abortion thread, but it fits better here:
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a27479184/alabama-abortion-ban-clyde-chambliss/

Quote
And, lastly, there's this cat, Clyde Chambliss, the Pride of Prattville, who was one of the prime movers of the law, and who was asked whether in vitro fertilization clinics that discard embryos could be criminally liable under this new law. Of course not, Chambliss replies. After all, people Chambliss knows might need to use those.

"The egg in the lab doesn’t apply. It’s not in a woman. She’s not pregnant."

Game? Given away. This wasn't about protecting god's little embryos. It was about asserting control over women, taking away their physical autonomy in the most intimate fashion.
:adios:

Offline libstradamus

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 49371
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #289 on: May 15, 2019, 06:13:01 PM »
Georgia giving a clump of cells personhood to count in the census is pretty whaaaaaa?
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online Ksuminnesotacat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 127
  • Being a Viking fan has its own issues
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #290 on: May 15, 2019, 06:28:16 PM »
Georgia giving a clump of cells personhood to count in the census is pretty whaaaaaa?

Quite possibly a new form of Liberrish ?
Effort management sucks spell it out taserface!

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15513
  • Gucci Mane Book Reader
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #291 on: May 15, 2019, 06:52:58 PM »

Offline Matt Mckee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10260
    • View Profile

Offline IPA4Me

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4125
  • El Guapo
    • View Profile
    • Life Advice
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #293 on: May 16, 2019, 07:51:47 AM »
That was two years ago.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk


Offline libstradamus

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 49371
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #294 on: May 16, 2019, 07:53:29 AM »
Missouri, come on down!
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Matt Mckee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10260
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #295 on: May 16, 2019, 07:54:21 AM »
That was two years ago.

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk

Sorry, I just saw that.  Someone put it on Facebook and I thought it was recent.

Online 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16034
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #296 on: May 16, 2019, 08:00:56 AM »
:adios:

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9646
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #297 on: May 16, 2019, 08:03:42 AM »
Missouri, come on down!
:facepalm:

They could at least pass sports gambling now too.

Offline Matt Mckee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10260
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #298 on: May 16, 2019, 08:04:53 AM »

Online Dlew12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 18882
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Killing babies at 9 months
« Reply #299 on: May 16, 2019, 08:31:59 AM »
I find it a bit odd that the Georgia and Alabama laws haven't been discussed on here yet.  Pro-lifers, are these good or bad?  Most of our discussions have been hypothetical laws.  Now we have two examples.  Thoughts?
Regarding Missouri - I'm generally opposed to legislatures passing obviously unconstitutional laws.  I think the term "medical emergency" is too vague, but vague language like that has passed muster in the past.

Ignoring those issues (which aren't small issues), and without having a ton of time to analyze Missouri's law in particular, I think it's good.    There may be something I'm overlooking though.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]