Author Topic: Klieman ain't the answer  (Read 14065 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline slackcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1765
  • worst ever
    • View Profile
Klieman ain't the answer
« on: December 07, 2018, 06:59:08 PM »
Really, anyone named "The Mole" shouldn't set foot in Manhattan, let alone Kansas.



(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Online KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7085
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2018, 07:49:29 PM »
I was all in on him until this thread
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21893
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #2 on: December 07, 2018, 07:51:57 PM »
What if the question is 'who is named "The Mole" and shouldn't set foot in Manhattan, let alone Kansas?'

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85174
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2018, 10:31:59 PM »
What if the question is 'who is named "The Mole" and shouldn't set foot in Manhattan, let alone Kansas?'

Check mate libtard


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline lakesbison

  • Dances With Wolves Aggie
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 504
    • View Profile
    • BisoNation
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2018, 11:00:07 PM »
You guys dont deserve him and you dont deserve winning then.
www.BisoNation.com   7 time Natl Champs

K-State is NDSU 3.0  (cuz wyoming is 2.0)

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11635
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2018, 11:07:52 PM »
You guys dont deserve him and you dont deserve winning then.

We deserve whatever the eff we want. We deserves our coach. We deserve everything, at least for a day. eff off if you don’t think that.
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2020, 06:20:14 PM »
Jesus, when this dude has a quarterback I'm not sure he'll ever lose. This might be the best, really bad football team in the history of the sport.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19381
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2020, 06:22:06 PM »
Jesus, when this dude has a quarterback I'm not sure he'll ever lose. This might be the best, really bad football team in the history of the sport.
The future does look exciting.  I do think it's too quick to dump on Howard, his mistakes can be corrected.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53674
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #8 on: November 07, 2020, 06:22:43 PM »
Jesus, when this dude has a quarterback I'm not sure he'll ever lose. This might be the best, really bad football team in the history of the sport.
We have a very good DL I think and other than Deuce and a couple DB's everyone isn't very good

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30234
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #9 on: November 07, 2020, 06:23:29 PM »
Jesus, when this dude has a quarterback I'm not sure he'll ever lose. This might be the best, really bad football team in the history of the sport.

When do you think he will have a QB?
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #10 on: November 07, 2020, 06:24:42 PM »
Jesus, when this dude has a quarterback I'm not sure he'll ever lose. This might be the best, really bad football team in the history of the sport.

When do you think he will have a QB?

Is your memory mumped? You think we lose that game with Skylar?

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30234
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #11 on: November 07, 2020, 06:26:16 PM »
Jesus, when this dude has a quarterback I'm not sure he'll ever lose. This might be the best, really bad football team in the history of the sport.

When do you think he will have a QB?

Is your memory mumped? You think we lose that game with Skylar?

We lost to Arkansas State with Skylar at QB
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #12 on: November 07, 2020, 06:28:08 PM »
Jesus, when this dude has a quarterback I'm not sure he'll ever lose. This might be the best, really bad football team in the history of the sport.

When do you think he will have a QB?

Is your memory mumped? You think we lose that game with Skylar?

We lost to Arkansas State with Skylar at QB

Yeah, that's probably more indicative of what the team is instead of everything that happened since.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #13 on: November 07, 2020, 06:33:46 PM »
He needs to delegate things like time management and extra points to someone better at it but everything else is pretty impressive so far
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #14 on: November 07, 2020, 06:36:44 PM »
He needs to delegate things like time management and extra points to someone better at it but everything else is pretty impressive so far

That two point conversion was stupid, I can't remember the last time I've seen someone other than him do that in the first half and he's done it unsuccessfully more than once. Stuff like that is a byproduct of dominating lower level schools when you can get away with that crap.

Offline kashi1965

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 365
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #15 on: November 07, 2020, 06:38:35 PM »
Jesus, when this dude has a quarterback I'm not sure he'll ever lose. This might be the best, really bad football team in the history of the sport.

When do you think he will have a QB?

Is your memory mumped? You think we lose that game with Skylar?
we definitely win that game with Skylar. by more than 1 score. I give big kudos to the coaches for schemes that allow a roster of lower talent actually compete with rosters with SIGNIFICANTLY more talent. But they should be blamed for not making sure we had a backup QB ready that was not a true freshman. they take the blame for the QB situation. also, next year dont look any better. our better than adequate defense is going to lose the entire DL and all the LBs. We have no playmakers on offense. next year will probably look worse because now we won't have any defense to help protect an anemic offense. this is going to take years to improve because this staff is incapable of recruiting well enough to fix things in a hurry

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63767
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #16 on: November 07, 2020, 06:40:00 PM »
Lol at freaking out about having a freshman backup
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44804
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #17 on: November 07, 2020, 06:44:35 PM »
Lol at freaking out about having a freshman backup

Almost any sane person would be thrilled with a true freshman as a back up, but not kashi. OU, Alabama, Clemson all have freshman backups, I'm sure those coaches are lamenting the lack of talent at the position.

Never mind how rare it is to lose a starting QB for the season after 2.5 games.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15097
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #18 on: November 07, 2020, 06:46:37 PM »
Kli has a 3 year mandate as far as I’m concerned. If we’re not at least on the cusp of a Big 12 title by then, we can reassess.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19381
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #19 on: November 07, 2020, 07:41:42 PM »
If he loses to Iowa State, his ass is grass.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53674
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #20 on: November 07, 2020, 07:42:45 PM »
Kli has a 3 year mandate as far as I’m concerned. If we’re not at least on the cusp of a Big 12 title by then, we can reassess.
He can stay as long as he wants IMO. This season is gravy.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30234
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #21 on: November 07, 2020, 07:44:31 PM »
If he loses to Iowa State, his ass is grass.

We actually have the better QB so we should win
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19381
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #22 on: November 07, 2020, 07:45:13 PM »
If he loses to Iowa State, his ass is grass.

We actually have the better QB so we should win
NO EXCUSES CHRIS.

Offline kashi1965

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 365
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #23 on: November 07, 2020, 08:14:07 PM »
Lol at freaking out about having a freshman backup

Almost any sane person would be thrilled with a true freshman as a back up, but not kashi. OU, Alabama, Clemson all have freshman backups, I'm sure those coaches are lamenting the lack of talent at the position.

Never mind how rare it is to lose a starting QB for the season after 2.5 games.
why would anyone want a true frosh as a backup? i can guarantee no coach wants to rely on a true frosh QB. other than Clemson or Bama and even those coaches would prefer not to. Most #1 QB recruits in america dont play as true freshmen. hard to believe Klieman had no one any better than Howard. but it is what it is. Another year with far less than ideal roster. will KSU ever have a truly competitive deep roster?

Offline TheHamburglar

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5729
    • View Profile
Re: Klieman ain't the answer
« Reply #24 on: November 07, 2020, 08:27:39 PM »
I think all these things can be true:
1. Overall, Klieman’s a pretty good coach/program CEO
2. His end half time management skills & points chasing decisions are outlier bad for a good coach. Like a kid taking an assessment test getting 90th percentile in everything except in one subject they get an 18th percentile.
3. Will Howard is playing as a true freshman QB
4. It’s really hard to judge a true freshman QB
5. The number of wobbly balls he throws is concerning for a potential developmental P5 QB.
6. Skyler threw a much better ball when he was getting PT as a RSFR.
7. Given how Skyler has progressed over 3 years, I’m not sure Klein is the best QB skill developer.
« Last Edit: November 07, 2020, 08:31:50 PM by TheHamburglar »
I got a guy on the other line about some white walls