0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It would be pretty disappointing.Trump's opponent in 2016 used the N word all the time while first lady of Arkansas. The State of Arkansas used to be a customer of mine, and the long time people there who were around when Clinton was gubnor would often talk how angry she would get if people of a certain color didn't fall in line with her initiatives to "help" them. I believe it to be a generational thing.
Yup. This looks super easy but I submit to do it right will be a true labor
If a "tape" of Donald Trump is released where he uses racial slurs (specifically "the n-word") to disparage a person of color, how would you react?
Quote from: Dugout DickStone on August 22, 2018, 10:40:50 PMYup. This looks super easy but I submit to do it right will be a true laborYou are not allowed to post in here. You have like 5 boring things you post over and over again. If Dax is a book, you're a laffy taffy joke
allow me to step in and inform everyone that there is not a single non-toxic substance in the universe. the only thing that's crucial is the level of the dose and the length of the exposure (acute vs. chronic).
Take us through the battery production process Trey. From the mines to the production floor.Here’s a primer. It takes as much 500k gallons of water to mine 1 ton of Lithium. Lithium is found in places that water is scarce.
None of my stuff will be good anymore with football within reach.
Quote from: sys on August 24, 2018, 09:11:13 AMhttps://twitter.com/ezraklein/status/1032696400960741377So today is a day when LibBots don't trust DHS to their job. Let us know when LibBots trust DHS implicitly, again. It seems to vacillate back and forth favoring anything that might make Trump look bad.This doesn't include the hate/love factor for DHS. Pub wants to give DHS more power or at least maintain power, Libs hate it. Lib wants to give DHS more power, Libs love it, interchange as needed if it involves Trump.
https://twitter.com/ezraklein/status/1032696400960741377
From Politico:"How have we reached a point in this country when nearly half the voters of a U.S. state so mistrust, and even revile, major media outlets that they are willing to brush aside credible evidence and elect an accused sexual predator simply out of spite? How have we reached a point where a president of the United States can just declare “fake” news he doesn’t like—and largely get away with it?In at least one survey, trust in the media—the necessary vanguard of any free society—is even lower than trust in Trump, which itself is nothing to tweet about. How on earth has this happened?"No, the real reason for a situation that allows the Roy Moores and Donald Trumps of the world to rise above mere laughingstock status is that the media has totally lost its connection with a large portion of the nation, almost all of them conservatives. Worse, the media has become what Trump and allies refer to as “the opposition party”—and, as such, a most useful foil for the Trump administration.This problem is real. The anger against the mainstream media is deep-seated. And, as difficult it is for many to accept, much of the anger is justified.
Quote"How have we reached a point in this country when nearly half the voters of a U.S. state so mistrust, and even revile, major media outlets that they are willing to brush aside credible evidence and elect an accused sexual predator simply out of spite? How have we reached a point where a president of the United States can just declare “fake” news he doesn’t like—and largely get away with it?Pillar of the Democratic Party, Bill Clinton?
"How have we reached a point in this country when nearly half the voters of a U.S. state so mistrust, and even revile, major media outlets that they are willing to brush aside credible evidence and elect an accused sexual predator simply out of spite? How have we reached a point where a president of the United States can just declare “fake” news he doesn’t like—and largely get away with it?
I know you'll get all mad TBT, but multiple women accused Bill Clinton of sexual crimes before he was elected and it could be argued he committed sexual assault while in the White House. But Libs, being Libs closed ranks quickly on all of that stuff.This is the perfect article. Well, you know you have to believe the victims, but . . . you know she could have been making it all up, and of course the THE VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY. But, #metoo . . tho (unless a Dem hero is accused). https://www.vox.com/2016/1/6/10722580/bill-clinton-juanita-broaddrickAppreciate that Vox, ya know, had to "explain" the situation to us. Libs always there to "explain" and re-direct.
Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on August 28, 2018, 11:20:46 AM Yep, I mean with the United States rolling out a trillion dollar nuclear weapons modernization plan, signed by your guy, with the Russians rolling out new and upgraded ICBM/s/Nukes, with NATO still engaged in surrounding Russia (with Spanish jets "accidentally" firing missiles towards Russia in NATO exercises), with the growing Anti-Russian rhetoric etc. etc. etc.Who could possibly have any concern about how things could escalate?You've got your finger on the pulse as always LibBot7.
