Building a Mosque near ground zero

[chunkles]

Champions of Freedom.  Stalwart defenders of the constitution.

[06wildcat]

Perhaps the other two existing mosques within two blocks of ground zero should close as well. 

[fatty fat fat]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

[OK_Cat]

 

[Saulbadguy]

I'm hoping to open a string of Satanic Churches across the country.  Can anyone point out a few good locations for such? 

Across the street from the Phelps compound.

[Sugar Dick]

We need to organize a CatHoops pep rally in AFH.  Those free speech loving hippies should have no problem with that.  I doubt it costs more than $200-300 an hour to rent that piss smelling inbreeding hillbilly harem.

 

[TBL]

I'm hoping to open a string of Satanic Churches across the country.  Can anyone point out a few good locations for such? 

Across the street from the Phelps compound.

Beat me to it.   

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

This is the attitude of the so-called moderate bridge-building imam.

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

[Benja]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

This is the attitude of the so-called moderate bridge-building imam.

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

That's so dumb I wouldn't even know where to start on it. I truly hope you don't honestly believe that.

I haven't read through this whole thread but the bottom line is that, unquestionably, they should be able to build the thing.

There are certain rare situations in which the constitution should be violated, such as when our imminent safety is in danger among select other situations, but this is not, and is not even close, to being one of those situations.

Does it suck? Yes.
Does it personally piss me off? Yep.
Is that worth amending the very freedom our country stands for? Hell no. Not even close.

[Pete]

Do they allow mexican churches near the alamo?
 

Thank you, it's about time we called attention to this.

It's repulsive.  The entire Almo grounds are literally surrounded with Mexican restaurants, shops, and there IS a Catholic church.  The vast majority of AMERICAN souls lost in masacre at the Alamo were protestant anglos of Northern European decent.

THEY HAVE CINCO DE MAYO CELEBRATIONS THERE!  They literally celebrate the country and culture that masacred all those American souls at the Alamo.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

This is the attitude of the so-called moderate bridge-building imam.

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

That's so dumb I wouldn't even know where to start on it. I truly hope you don't honestly believe that.

I haven't read through this whole thread but the bottom line is that, unquestionably, they should be able to build the thing.

There are certain rare situations in which the constitution should be violated, such as when our imminent safety is in danger among select other situations, but this is not, and is not even close, to being one of those situations.

Does it suck? Yes.
Does it personally piss me off? Yep.
Is that worth amending the very freedom our country stands for? Hell no. Not even close.

I'm not arguing whether or not they have the right to build it, they do.

But if they were truly moderates, interested in building bridges between Muslims and infidels, they would build it somewhere else. There are already mosques in the area, but this is a big deal to them to build right there, where a piece of airplane fell to the earth and rendered the building unusable. It is a trophy.

[Benja]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

This is the attitude of the so-called moderate bridge-building imam.

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

That's so dumb I wouldn't even know where to start on it. I truly hope you don't honestly believe that.

I haven't read through this whole thread but the bottom line is that, unquestionably, they should be able to build the thing.

There are certain rare situations in which the constitution should be violated, such as when our imminent safety is in danger among select other situations, but this is not, and is not even close, to being one of those situations.

Does it suck? Yes.
Does it personally piss me off? Yep.
Is that worth amending the very freedom our country stands for? Hell no. Not even close.

I'm not arguing whether or not they have the right to build it, they do.

But if they were truly moderates, interested in building bridges between Muslims and infidels, they would build it somewhere else. There are already mosques in the area, but this is a big deal to them to build right there, where a piece of airplane fell to the earth and rendered the building unusable. It is a trophy.

If you are simply arguing that Muslims don't appear to be the least bit interested in maintaining good relations with just about anyone else outside their belief structure, you won't get much resistance here.

Islam appears stuck in the dark ages, promoting among others denigration of women and little value on human life, with no interest in conforming to the times or "building bridges" with anyone.

[fatty fat fat]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

no one is forcing you to make that analogy. stop making sh*t up.

[Rage Against the McKee]

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

Yes, there is absolutely no difference...


 

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

no one is forcing you to make that analogy. stop making sh*t up.

Why do you think they refuse to build in a different location? Or, why did they choose that particular building?

[Sugar Dick]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

This is the attitude of the so-called moderate bridge-building imam.

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

That's so dumb I wouldn't even know where to start on it. I truly hope you don't honestly believe that.

I haven't read through this whole thread but the bottom line is that, unquestionably, they should be able to build the thing.

There are certain rare situations in which the constitution should be violated, such as when our imminent safety is in danger among select other situations, but this is not, and is not even close, to being one of those situations.

Does it suck? Yes.
Does it personally piss me off? Yep.
Is that worth amending the very freedom our country stands for? Hell no. Not even close.

What are your thoughts on Slander and Libel?  Violation of the right to free speech?

Not every constraint or restriction is a violation of the Constitution.  Look at gun laws, zoning laws, etc.  Even the sacred first amendment has restrictions (i.e. right to assemble almost always requires a permit).

Telling these assholes to shazbot! off is no more a violation of the constitution, than requiring a meeting in front of the town planning commission to get a fence built around your yard, or a room above your garage.

If liberal hero FDR was still around, he'd throw every muslim in a concentration camp until the war in the Middle East was over, just like he did the Japanese during WW2.

[Sugar Dick]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

no one is forcing you to make that analogy. stop making sh*t up.

Why do you think they refuse to build in a different location? Or, why did they choose that particular building?

Don't you know it's unconstitutional to even ask?

"If it looks like a duck, and walks like a duck, it's probably misunderstood and requires unconditional tolerance and support."
- Anonymous Liberal Jerkoff

[Rage Against the McKee]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

This is the attitude of the so-called moderate bridge-building imam.

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

That's so dumb I wouldn't even know where to start on it. I truly hope you don't honestly believe that.

I haven't read through this whole thread but the bottom line is that, unquestionably, they should be able to build the thing.

There are certain rare situations in which the constitution should be violated, such as when our imminent safety is in danger among select other situations, but this is not, and is not even close, to being one of those situations.

Does it suck? Yes.
Does it personally piss me off? Yep.
Is that worth amending the very freedom our country stands for? Hell no. Not even close.

What are your thoughts on Slander and Libel?  Violation of the right to free speech?

Slander and libel are crimes with victims. Who is the victim in the construction of a mosque?

Not every constraint or restriction is a violation of the Constitution.  Look at gun laws, zoning laws, etc.  Even the sacred first amendment has restrictions (i.e. right to assemble almost always requires a permit).

Telling these assholes to shazbot! off is no more a violation of the constitution, than requiring a meeting in front of the town planning commission to get a fence built around your yard, or a room above your garage.

This would be a good point if there were any current zoning laws prohibiting religious buildings. Unfortunately for you, there are not.

If liberal hero FDR was still around, he'd throw every muslim in a concentration camp until the war in the Middle East was over, just like he did the Japanese during WW2.

This was a very racist policy. Why do you want to see it happen again?

The bottom line is that the government has no business telling anyone what they can or cannot do with their property as long you meet all current zoning laws. To single out a single property holder is a violation of their personal freedoms.

[Paul Moscow]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

no one is forcing you to make that analogy. stop making sh*t up.

Why do you think they refuse to build in a different location? Or, why did they choose that particular building?

You think they chose that building because it was damaged in the WTC attack don't you.

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

no one is forcing you to make that analogy. stop making sh*t up.

Why do you think they refuse to build in a different location? Or, why did they choose that particular building?

You think they chose that building because it was damaged in the WTC attack don't you.

Yes I do, unless you can show me proof otherwise.  I also believe they will fight to the bitter end to keep that particular site, and if somehow they are forced to find another site, they will decide not to build at all.

[Rage Against the McKee]

Yes I do, unless you can show me proof otherwise.  I also believe they will fight to the bitter end to keep that particular site, and if somehow they are forced to find another site, they will decide not to build at all.

Have the muslims actually been told that they cannot build the mosque by the government? If not, they are just filing an application and are not currently fighting anything. I could be wrong (I've been out of the country for a while), but I'm under the impression that the only people who are fighting anything are the people who want to see the government step in and tell these people that they chose the wrong religion to worship in the vicinity of ground zero.

[Kat Kid]

Did you know there is a PRAYER ROOM in the Pentagon that MUSLIMS use as a MOSQUE?  Hard to believe the ARMY is letting this happen RIGHT UNDER THEIR NOSES ON HALLOWED GROUND!

[Rage Against the McKee]

Did you know there is a PRAYER ROOM in the Pentagon that MUSLIMS use as a MOSQUE?  Hard to believe the ARMY is letting this happen RIGHT UNDER THEIR NOSES ON HALLOWED GROUND!

The most important thing to consider here is how many feet this mosque is located from the spot where the plane crashed, obviously.

[Paul Moscow]

suck my balls. we are building the thing.

This is no different than the Nubbs coming to KSU, beating our a$$es, then dancing on the giant powercat in the middle of the field while flipping off the crowd.

no one is forcing you to make that analogy. stop making sh*t up.

Why do you think they refuse to build in a different location? Or, why did they choose that particular building?

You think they chose that building because it was damaged in the WTC attack don't you.

Yes I do, unless you can show me proof otherwise.  I also believe they will fight to the bitter end to keep that particular site, and if somehow they are forced to find another site, they will decide not to build at all.

So the implicit purpose of this mosque in lower manhattan is to insult, anger, and possibly even harm Americans while simultaneously converting moderate muslims toward radicalism?

The mastery of it all, of course, is that this is all being done behind the scenes and is enabled by the American public being sold the story that this mosque is meant to build bridges, heal, and understand religious freedom and tolerance - none of which is meant to actually take place.

Is that about right?

[Rage Against the McKee]

It would be absolutely hilarious to see some of these guys' reactions if the muslims were to decide to exercise their second amendment rights and store guns at the mosque.