Author Topic: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats  (Read 545188 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4075 on: December 17, 2019, 07:48:00 AM »

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4076 on: December 17, 2019, 07:51:04 AM »
lol


Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85346
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4077 on: December 17, 2019, 08:33:16 AM »
lmao


https://twitter.com/gabecortez/status/1206730413055586304


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12817
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4078 on: December 17, 2019, 01:50:03 PM »
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4079 on: December 17, 2019, 07:20:29 PM »
lol



kind of a give away for that airport game some of you play.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."


Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4081 on: December 19, 2019, 03:38:01 PM »
BHAM means Birmingham? Huh


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

weird acronym for total crap hole

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4082 on: December 19, 2019, 03:41:55 PM »
It's Bombingham

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39169
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4083 on: December 19, 2019, 04:25:12 PM »
airport codes are not allowed to start with "K"

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4084 on: December 19, 2019, 06:58:12 PM »
Tulsi's such an adorable idiot. The lone Democratic Party MAGA.

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1207547421745528833

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19133
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4085 on: December 19, 2019, 08:10:51 PM »
How was the first hour of the debate?
:adios:

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 41989
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4086 on: December 19, 2019, 08:43:21 PM »
How was the first hour of the debate?

Lakers at Bucks.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14961
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4087 on: December 19, 2019, 09:08:34 PM »

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4088 on: December 19, 2019, 11:06:04 PM »
They should draw straws out of a hat and go with it at this point and put all the money toward congressional races.
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4089 on: December 20, 2019, 06:46:31 AM »
How was the first hour of the debate?

It was terrible, hours two and three were much better.

Yang- his supporters will cry about how he got less time than everyone else again but he doesn't utilize what he has and doesn't insist on rebutting like the others do.

Steyer- grats on the impeachment, it's a travesty he was on that stage instead of Booker, he offered literally nothing

Mayo- like the other two before him, he melted as the target, had a horrendous night. He comes off as very insincere.

Klo- damn, her best night of the campaign. She clearly doesn't like Mayo, seemed almost personal. She'll get noted for taking him out but I thought she was solid all around on policy. She's a moderate that sounded progressive.

Biden- he is what he is, I can see why some think he's relatable, he's old man folksy, but he doesn't relate to me at all. Sarah Sanders saved his ass, she made fun of him stuttering when he was telling a story about a kid who stutters, and everyone went nuts on her. The problem is, he wasn't stuttering himself when telling the story, he was mimicking the speech pattern of the kid in the story. He's so kringy.

Bernie- he's consistent, pretty much the same performance. His noteworthy moment came because of a moderator error. I don't remember the woman's name but there were a series of questions about the environment that pretty much everyone got to answer but Bernie. The moderator then asked him a question about race. He started to discuss environmental racism and the moderator cut him off, stating that his answer was not about race. He finished his answer anyway. This same moderator had a moment with Biden later when she pronounced Afghanistan differently than we hear and he didn't understand her so she had to repeat it. Some dip crap at the Huffington Post tried to say that Biden challenged her, he definitely did not.

Warren- similar to Bernie that she's pretty consistent with her message and delivery. She popped mayo about having a $5000/person fundraiser in a wine cave. She definitely won the exchange, the moderators let it go for too long, Klo actually was the one to stop it, only to then body Pete herself. As discussed I will caucus for Warren, and I'm a donor, but she doesn't inspire me. Probably because I'm old but she just doesn't move me at all. She's smart, and quick thinking but I just don't hang on her every word.

All in all this debate was a disappointment given the relatively small number of candidates on stage. I thought the moderators stunk.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19133
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4090 on: December 20, 2019, 06:50:43 AM »
Man, I watched hours 2 and 3 and came across with pretty different takes than you.  I’ll write up my thoughts later today, but I did enjoy Yang purely angling for a cabinet position in a Warren White House.
:adios:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4091 on: December 20, 2019, 07:15:03 AM »
Just can’t see how Bernie is even viable with the New McCarthyite Left.  The man has strong latent Communist/ProSoviet Union feelings and likely longs for the days of the Central Committee and five year plans.





Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4093 on: December 20, 2019, 08:10:35 PM »
Currently the RNC has 8x the cash on hand as compared to the DNC and is running about 3x on fundraising YTD.




Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20500
    • View Profile

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15224
    • View Profile
2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4095 on: December 22, 2019, 10:40:07 AM »
That makes me admire Pete more that he didn’t even try to engage on that level in the debates.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4096 on: December 22, 2019, 11:06:45 AM »
That makes me admire Pete more that he didn’t even try to engage on that level in the debates.

What?

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19133
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4097 on: December 22, 2019, 11:18:45 AM »
That makes me admire Pete more that he didn’t even try to engage on that level in the debates.

What?
I assume Catastrophe thinks it’s good that he didn’t quibble with Warren’s egregiously incorrect statements she used to attack him, because even if the statements were true it is a dumb line of attack.
:adios:

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15224
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4098 on: December 22, 2019, 02:33:07 PM »
Bingo

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15224
    • View Profile
Re: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats
« Reply #4099 on: December 22, 2019, 02:36:33 PM »
I’m not sure I’d say egregiously inaccurate, though. Just insincere as best.