Author Topic: 2020 presidential candidate 'crats (Read 91207 times)

sys · « **Reply #3850 on:** November 27, 2019, 02:51:07 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on November 27, 2019, 11:27:21 AM

She used to be a Pub iirc

yeah, she was a garden variety 'pub when her children were in school, so it seems pretty on brand. the weirder thing to me is sending your two children to different schools. i'd like the campaign to explain that, but they probably think saying anything just keeps the story alive longer.

Dlew12 · « **Reply #3851 on:** November 27, 2019, 03:28:31 PM »

Quote from: sys on November 27, 2019, 02:51:07 PM

Quote from: steve dave on November 27, 2019, 11:27:21 AM
She used to be a Pub iirc

yeah, she was a garden variety 'pub when her children were in school, so it seems pretty on brand. the weirder thing to me is sending your two children to different schools. i'd like the campaign to explain that, but they probably think saying anything just keeps the story alive longer.

Oh. Well knowing that she was a 'pub at the time makes it less funny. Thanks guys.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #3852 on:** November 27, 2019, 08:51:42 PM »

Quote from: sys on November 27, 2019, 02:51:07 PM

Quote from: steve dave on November 27, 2019, 11:27:21 AM
She used to be a Pub iirc

yeah, she was a garden variety 'pub when her children were in school, so it seems pretty on brand. the weirder thing to me is sending your two children to different schools. i'd like the campaign to explain that, but they probably think saying anything just keeps the story alive longer.

It's not weird at all. I'm sure money came into play when her son went to private school. She was a law professor at UT and had been for a couple of years when her son started private school. Her daughter was also already in high school at the time, I'm sure she decided she was good at whatever Austin area high school she was at, I'm sure it was a good one.

Katpappy · « **Reply #3853 on:** November 28, 2019, 07:24:08 PM »

Ya know, the fact that billionaires are coming out of the woodwork to run against Trump makes him more attractive for reelection.

DaBigTrain · « **Reply #3854 on:** November 28, 2019, 07:25:29 PM »

Katdaddy, you do know that Trump himself is a billionaire, right?

waks · « **Reply #3855 on:** November 28, 2019, 07:25:45 PM »

Quote from: Katdaddy on November 28, 2019, 07:24:08 PM

Ya know, the fact that billionaires are coming out of the woodwork to run against Trump makes him more attractive for reelection.

Why?

Katpappy · « **Reply #3856 on:** November 28, 2019, 07:29:36 PM »

Quote from: waks on November 28, 2019, 07:25:45 PM

Quote from: Katdaddy on November 28, 2019, 07:24:08 PM
Ya know, the fact that billionaires are coming out of the woodwork to run against Trump makes him more attractive for reelection.
Why?

Every billionaire is a scum of the earth type that only care about other billionaires keep making money. They somehow feel Trump is a threat to their lifestyle.

DaBigTrain · « **Reply #3857 on:** November 28, 2019, 07:30:37 PM »

Quote from: Katdaddy on November 28, 2019, 07:29:36 PM

Quote from: waks on November 28, 2019, 07:25:45 PM
Quote from: Katdaddy on November 28, 2019, 07:24:08 PM
Ya know, the fact that billionaires are coming out of the woodwork to run against Trump makes him more attractive for reelection.
Why?

Every billionaire is a scum of the earth type that only care about other billionaires keep making money. They somehow feel Trump is a threat to their lifestyle.

He literally gave hundreds of millions in tax breaks to line their pockets with those tax cuts.

Katpappy · « **Reply #3858 on:** November 28, 2019, 07:47:04 PM »

Quote from: DaBigTrain on November 28, 2019, 07:30:37 PM

Quote from: Katdaddy on November 28, 2019, 07:29:36 PM
Quote from: waks on November 28, 2019, 07:25:45 PM
Quote from: Katdaddy on November 28, 2019, 07:24:08 PM
Ya know, the fact that billionaires are coming out of the woodwork to run against Trump makes him more attractive for reelection.
Why?

Every billionaire is a scum of the earth type that only care about other billionaires keep making money. They somehow feel Trump is a threat to their lifestyle.

He literally gave hundreds of millions in tax breaks to line their pockets with those tax cuts.

I don't know what threat(s) he poses to these billionaires, but it's enough to get them to run against him.

michigancat · « **Reply #3859 on:** November 28, 2019, 08:26:37 PM »

New Pete ad in Iowa taking aim at Warren and Bernie over college affordability/debt (but not by name), arguing they’d alienate half the country by insisting it be “free even for the kids of millionaires”. H/t @McCormickJohn
pic.twitter.com/SEAcOdHcAq
— Alex Thompson (@AlxThomp) November 29, 2019

?s=19

michigancat · « **Reply #3860 on:** November 28, 2019, 08:35:55 PM »

He's got the progressives fired up!

waks · « **Reply #3861 on:** November 29, 2019, 10:05:32 AM »

Quote from: Katdaddy on November 28, 2019, 07:47:04 PM

Quote from: DaBigTrain on November 28, 2019, 07:30:37 PM
Quote from: Katdaddy on November 28, 2019, 07:29:36 PM
Quote from: waks on November 28, 2019, 07:25:45 PM
Quote from: Katdaddy on November 28, 2019, 07:24:08 PM
Ya know, the fact that billionaires are coming out of the woodwork to run against Trump makes him more attractive for reelection.
Why?

Every billionaire is a scum of the earth type that only care about other billionaires keep making money. They somehow feel Trump is a threat to their lifestyle.

He literally gave hundreds of millions in tax breaks to line their pockets with those tax cuts.

I don't know what threat(s) he poses to these billionaires, but it's enough to get them to run against him.

They're running against him because they think they can beat him because he's a lunatic. It has nothing to do with him being a threat to their lifestyles. It has everything to do with power/ambition. Bloomberg entered the race out of fear of Bernie/Warren and progressives that would tax the crap out of him.

Katpappy · « **Reply #3862 on:** November 29, 2019, 10:14:04 AM »

Read American History for the period starting around the 1900's. You will find out that the presidential races were fixed by the ultra rich, and in reality it still is.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #3863 on:** November 29, 2019, 02:20:28 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on November 28, 2019, 08:26:37 PM

New Pete ad in Iowa taking aim at Warren and Bernie over college affordability/debt (but not by name), arguing they’d alienate half the country by insisting it be “free even for the kids of millionaires”. H/t @McCormickJohn
pic.twitter.com/SEAcOdHcAq
— Alex Thompson (@AlxThomp) November 29, 2019
?s=19

This ad just came on. Of course like everything else having to do with Pete, his critique is insincere. The proposal they are speaking about is free public education for all, how many children of millionaires are attending public universities? I'd bet a very small percentage and most of those are in the south and midwest. His television graphic says "free public college for 80% of students." Is that 80% of all college students or 80% of all students enrolled in a public college or university? If it's the former, that's all public university attendees, as far as the cost goes there's no difference. If it's the latter, he's excluding a hell of a lot more than millionaires from attending college for free.

steve dave · « **Reply #3864 on:** November 29, 2019, 03:05:56 PM »

It appears that a disturbing percentage of our population:

a) believe people worth $10m+ send their children to public universities.

b) it would be a problem if these people’s children got to go to public universities for free if they decided they wanted to for some reason.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

nicname · « **Reply #3865 on:** November 29, 2019, 03:34:24 PM »

Pete sucks. This is just another example.

memphis · « **Reply #3866 on:** November 29, 2019, 03:50:02 PM »

So Pete thinks Iowans are putzes who think that's a valid reason why Pete would be the right amount of progressive to govern? Or is that like really a thing people say as an argument against the viability of free college?

sys · « **Reply #3867 on:** November 29, 2019, 04:00:05 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on November 29, 2019, 03:05:56 PM

a) believe people worth $10m+ send their children to public universities.

i think there are probably tons of millionaires whose children attend public universities. moving the cutoff to 10m probably thins the herd enormously.

sys · « **Reply #3868 on:** November 29, 2019, 05:31:14 PM »

cumulative.

TV ad $ in IOWA by 2020 candidates thru this week:
Steyer: $9.7 million
Buttigieg: $4.8 million
Sanders: $4.2 million
Yang: $2.5 million
Biden: $1.5 million
Bennet: $1.1 million
Warren: $927k
Klobuchar: $790k
Harris: $576k
Delaney: $529k
Bullock: $411k
Gabbard: $259k
Castro: $48k
— David Wright (@DavidWright_CNN) November 26, 2019

MakeItRain · « **Reply #3869 on:** November 29, 2019, 09:22:59 PM »

Quote from: sys on November 29, 2019, 05:31:14 PM

cumulative.

TV ad $ in IOWA by 2020 candidates thru this week:
Steyer: $9.7 million
Buttigieg: $4.8 million
Sanders: $4.2 million
Yang: $2.5 million
Biden: $1.5 million
Bennet: $1.1 million
Warren: $927k
Klobuchar: $790k
Harris: $576k
Delaney: $529k
Bullock: $411k
Gabbard: $259k
Castro: $48k
— David Wright (@DavidWright_CNN) November 26, 2019

Seems right but Bullock seems very low and Bennett seems very high. Since Bullock received the endorsement of the Iowa AG, he's been all over the airwaves. I don't recall a single Bennett ad.

steve dave · « **Reply #3870 on:** November 30, 2019, 05:38:49 PM »

LMAOOOOO

Tomorrow, we’re kicking off our eight-day, 18 county “No Malarkey” barnstorm across Iowa! I’d love to see you there. Head to https://t.co/qm53SbH51r to find an event in your community. pic.twitter.com/YngzAn9vKZ
— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) November 29, 2019

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

resident LibBot dick holder · « **Reply #3871 on:** November 30, 2019, 05:40:34 PM »

Hahaha

Institutional Control · « **Reply #3872 on:** November 30, 2019, 05:43:52 PM »

That sounds like a rootin’ tootin’ good time.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Institutional Control · « **Reply #3873 on:** November 30, 2019, 05:49:33 PM »

Fired up and ready to go for the #NoMalarkey barnstorm! pic.twitter.com/4lpU7waqzh
— Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) November 30, 2019

?s=21

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Trim · « **Reply #3874 on:** November 30, 2019, 06:04:14 PM »

What does the red stylized E represent?