Author Topic: Somewhat dated but pertinent . . .  (Read 941 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53286
    • View Profile
Somewhat dated but pertinent . . .
« on: January 25, 2019, 01:35:01 PM »
Realizing that LibDerp Nation and in particular resident LibDerps aka the Perpetual Enraged New (Old) Neo Cons have now done a complete ideological 180 and are now all for U.S. Geo-Strategic Hegemony via military force, because in their dumb little heads they think that Trump is "withdrawing" from the world and selling out to Vlad Putin.

First of all, Trumps support of Guaido in Venezuela is a direct confrontation/affront to Russia and Putin . . . but you guys are too rough ridin' dumb to understand or recognize that.   We can just add that to the list of other instances where Trump is thwarting Putin and Russia at every turn, almost a total 180 from the Era of Post Election Flexibility 2012 to 2016 OKA the Great Bend Over (dumbed down from The Great Cucking at the request of certain resident sensitive souls).   But I digress . . .

The US – were energy dominance to succeed – simply would control the tap to the economic development – or its lack thereof – for rivals China, and Asia. And the US could squeeze Russia’s revenues in this way, too. In short, the US could put a tourniquet on China’s and Russia’s economic development plans. Is this why JCPOA was revoked by President Trump?
Here then, is the squaring of that circle (more US power, yet less empire): Trump’s US aims for ‘domination’, not through the globalists’ permanent infrastructure of the US defence umbrella, but through the smart leveraging of the US dollar and financial clearing monopoly, by ring-fencing, and holding tight, US technology, and by dominating the energy market, which in turn represents the on/off valve to economic growth for US rivals. In this way, Trump can ‘bring the troops home’, and yet America keeps its hegemony. Military conflict becomes a last resort.


https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/06/05/what-trump-policy-energy-dominance-means-for-world.html


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline LickNeckey

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6062
  • #fakeposts
    • View Profile
Re: Somewhat dated but pertinent . . .
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2019, 01:48:56 PM »
totally pertinent...

 :Ugh:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53286
    • View Profile
Re: Somewhat dated but pertinent . . .
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2019, 01:56:46 PM »
totally pertinent...

 :Ugh:

Hey dumbass, you guys are crying about leaving Syria, and last I checked Venezuela is on the front page.


Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Somewhat dated but pertinent . . .
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2019, 02:02:14 PM »
What did you think of the last 2/3s of the piece dax?  Why was a quote from Richard Spencer highlighted in a story about Trump's energy policies?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53286
    • View Profile
Re: Somewhat dated but pertinent . . .
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2019, 04:38:23 PM »
What did you think of the last 2/3s of the piece dax?  Why was a quote from Richard Spencer highlighted in a story about Trump's energy policies?

It seemed rather dumb to have that in there.

Just thought I'd mention that someone (pops collar) was pointing out the whole energy dominance thing about the same time as this article and how that alone was immensely damaging/unfriendly to Russia.
« Last Edit: January 25, 2019, 04:41:46 PM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64030
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Somewhat dated but pertinent . . .
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2019, 04:41:59 PM »
What did you think of the last 2/3s of the piece dax?  Why was a quote from Richard Spencer highlighted in a story about Trump's energy policies?

 :sdeek:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite