I'd vote for him. But only because I'm a pragmatist and understand that the political implications of giving this seat to a liberal far outweigh the harm of allowing an alleged scumbag to serve for a couple of years until the next primary. All things being equal, I'd much prefer a decent person to fill the office. But all things are most certainly not equal in a closely divided Senate. Doesn't mean I would like voting for him. Helps a little that the allegations are decades old and politically motivated, but I acknowledge the guy is a nut and most likely a perv.
Question: given the horrible nature of the allegations, why did Democrats wait to reveal them until after it was too late to replace Moore on the ballot? They would have had a far easier time torpedoing Moore during the primary, but that's not what Dems wanted. They don't care about keeping Moore out of the Senate - they care about winning the seat for a liberal. That's why they waited. Seems that politics outweighs the allegations for the Dems, too.