Author Topic: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)  (Read 140699 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30431
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1625 on: January 31, 2019, 01:47:41 PM »
Is it not obvious how wealthy chum1 is? And you think he has a mortgage :lol:
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1626 on: January 31, 2019, 02:29:12 PM »
Don't have a mortgage? ---> Write a property tax check
Have a mortgage but elected not to escrow ---> Write a property tax check

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1627 on: January 31, 2019, 02:45:33 PM »
if i didn't have a mortgage, i'd go out and get one just so i didn't have to try and remember to pay taxes and insurance.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline gatoveintisiete

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4036
  • Cold Ass Honkey
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1628 on: January 31, 2019, 03:20:46 PM »
Is it not obvious how wealthy chum1 is? And you think he has a mortgage :lol:

It's weird Chum cant give us a straight answer on his tax pain threshold, it's just a number, I mean surely he wants to keep some percentage of his income.
it’s not like I’m tired of WINNING, but dude, let me catch my breath.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1629 on: January 31, 2019, 03:27:39 PM »
Is it not obvious how wealthy chum1 is? And you think he has a mortgage :lol:

It's weird Chum cant give us a straight answer on his tax pain threshold, it's just a number, I mean surely he wants to keep some percentage of his income.

I have to wait until I get home to have access. I might be to lazy to get on my laptop, though.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1630 on: January 31, 2019, 03:37:44 PM »
but now I'm enraged about them because they capped my SALT deduction  :curse:
Trump needed the SALT cap to stick it to the rich-ish people in high-tax lib states like California, New York, Illinois, and ...wait, Nebraska?

yeah, we are a weird outlier state that has super high prop taxes. like, rich people states, states with no state income tax, and NE for some rough ridin' reason.

https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-the-highest-and-lowest-property-taxes/11585/

My levy is actually 2.41. and now I can't even deduct any of it.

You can deduct up to $10,000 of it.

I've got some terrible news for you ksu-dub. I pay state income taxes too. VERY SAD AND VERY UNFAIR.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1631 on: January 31, 2019, 04:29:57 PM »
Is it not obvious how wealthy chum1 is? And you think he has a mortgage :lol:

It's weird Chum cant give us a straight answer on his tax pain threshold, it's just a number, I mean surely he wants to keep some percentage of his income.

I have to wait until I get home to have access. I might be to lazy to get on my laptop, though.

I'm not trying to be an a-hole, btw. This is a topic that legitimately fascinates me. I want as many people as possible to win under this tax reform. The vast majority should.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15308
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1632 on: January 31, 2019, 04:51:08 PM »
I assume you mean winning in the short term micro context? Taxpayers paying s little less each could easily bring more negatives as a whole than we gain individually.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1633 on: January 31, 2019, 05:20:56 PM »
are you interested in the % at which he would feel he is paying too much, or the % he actually pays right now, that he does not think is too much?
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1634 on: January 31, 2019, 05:22:24 PM »
KSUDub - I texted my CPA this afternoon and they are going to figure my effective tax rate over the last couple years and send it to me this weekend. I did that for this thread alone. Wow!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15223
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1635 on: January 31, 2019, 06:08:53 PM »
Turbo tax did that for me automatically last year!

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1636 on: January 31, 2019, 06:11:39 PM »
My CPA is rough ridin' fired then


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1637 on: January 31, 2019, 06:22:20 PM »
2017: 11.75
2018: TBD

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21917
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1638 on: January 31, 2019, 06:26:04 PM »
If someone would have asked me what I thought it was, I would have said between 5 and 15%. Right on the money.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30431
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1639 on: January 31, 2019, 07:18:06 PM »
23.5 wouldn’t even phase you really
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21448
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1640 on: January 31, 2019, 07:20:19 PM »
I have the feeling I'm paying a lot less in taxes than I thot

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1641 on: January 31, 2019, 07:24:22 PM »
I assume you mean winning in the short term micro context? Taxpayers paying s little less each could easily bring more negatives as a whole than we gain individually.

My gawd Phil please cheer up.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1642 on: January 31, 2019, 07:33:23 PM »
phil, just cheer up and know that you win if your EFT is a fraction lower than it was last year.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64043
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1643 on: January 31, 2019, 07:37:41 PM »
did kdub give his #'s?  i don't remember
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15308
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1644 on: January 31, 2019, 07:41:12 PM »
phil, just cheer up and know that you win if your EFT is a fraction lower than it was last year.

 :cheers:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1645 on: January 31, 2019, 07:46:50 PM »
what numbers go in the numerator and denominator in this calculation?
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1646 on: January 31, 2019, 07:52:52 PM »
did kdub give his #'s?  i don't remember

I think he did a BIG DON! post about them being lower but don't think he was comfortable enough to share.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85343
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1647 on: January 31, 2019, 07:53:54 PM »
what numbers go in the numerator and denominator in this calculation?

just do them interchangeably until you get to a number that is reasonable. that is irl how I passed all math classes I've ever taken. 17,950,456 isn't it......0000057 isn't it......0.17 (to self: rough ridin' nailed it probably).

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1648 on: January 31, 2019, 08:21:54 PM »
i mean like on the tax side it it just income tax, income + cap gains + divs, all those + payroll taxes?  and then on the other side, include deferred income or no, add back in employer 401k matches, health care and/or employer side payroll taxes?  etc.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Taxes (GOP 2017 edition)
« Reply #1649 on: January 31, 2019, 08:31:52 PM »
Do whatever numbers you want, but I’m talking FIT only. Total FIT / AGI = Effective (aka “Average”) FIT.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.