Author Topic: David Cox to Rutgers  (Read 2821 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55978
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
David Cox to Rutgers
« on: May 13, 2010, 06:53:08 PM »
Per Adam Zagoria.  I think this is a positive (hence the "thumbs up").  Probably a non-factor, but the weaker Cox's school, the better for us.

Although it will be depressing if they get a QC visit.  :frown:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: David Cox to Rutgers
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2010, 07:03:35 PM »
i suppose it's good news.  would have been 2-3 years back, certainly.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: David Cox to Rutgers
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2010, 07:07:09 PM »
http://hoyatalk2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=22236

didn't realize there was so much skepticism regarding goodman qualifying.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55978
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: David Cox to Rutgers
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2010, 07:13:11 PM »
http://hoyatalk2.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=22236

didn't realize there was so much skepticism regarding goodman qualifying.

There was always a lot of confusion over whether he was an 11 or a 12.

The comments about Jeff Green and his agent are interesting, too.