BOOM MUTHA FUGGAZ!!
https://twitter.com/chrisbergpov/status/1255628882939691008
Having worked on white collar crime cases, as well as being an informed citizen, I can tell you that nearly everything the FBI does in the course of an investigation could be loosely called "entrapment". Look no further than the recent NCAA investigations. But there's a difference between the colloquial meaning and the legal meaning.
The FBI is under no obligation to put all their cards on the table when interviewing a potential witness or suspect. All this shows is that there are strategic reasons why that is the case. Public officials always have the option to, you know, tell the truth to investigators.
The same is true in the civil context. If you have a damning document or other evidentiary material and you're deposing someone under oath, you'll always ask questions first, then show them the exhibit that contradicts their testimony. Is that entrapment, too?