Trump owns Russia

[bucket]

I have nothing but "if"

'fraid so Bucket.

Hey, I just want a fair investigation. However, when the House Intelligence Committee Chairman overseeing the congressional investigation runs to the White House when he gets classified info, which may in fact be illegal. Well, that makes me nervous. As it should everyone in this country.

[bucket]

"Hey, let's go tell the guy I'm in charge of investigating what records they have on him and his team!"

- Devin Nunes

[SdK]

Dax, how is any of that related to the current FBI counter intelligence investigation on your man, Donald J Trump?

I thought we established that dax stands for nothing. Dax rails on libs and that's all he is worth. You think he has an actual opinion on anything? Lmao

[sonofdaxjones]

I have nothing but "if"

'fraid so Bucket.

Hey, I just want a fair investigation. However, when the House Intelligence Committee Chairman overseeing the congressional investigation runs to the White House when he gets classified info, which may in fact be illegal. Well, that makes me nervous. As it should everyone in this country.

Sure, but what part was classified?  Oh wait, Dems say it was, so it had to be, right?  (thus the meldown)

What's even scarier is that information that had little or no intelligence value in regards to the real question at hand was widely disseminated (see Obama order) across a number of agencies.   So it's pretty hard to get your "fair" investigation when there's clearly a vast attempt to muddy the waters.

[SdK]

Blah blah blah Obama blah blah blah. There's always some lib politician to point towards. Never acknowledge anything. Just deflect.

[SdK]

Who needs a sun shade when you have dax?

[bucket]

I have nothing but "if"

'fraid so Bucket.

Hey, I just want a fair investigation. However, when the House Intelligence Committee Chairman overseeing the congressional investigation runs to the White House when he gets classified info, which may in fact be illegal. Well, that makes me nervous. As it should everyone in this country.

Sure, but what part was classified?  Oh wait, Dems say it was, so it had to be, right?  (thus the meldown)

What's even scarier is that information that had little or no intelligence value in regards to the real question at hand was widely disseminated (see Obama order) across a number of agencies.   So it's pretty hard to get your "fair" investigation when there's clearly a vast attempt to muddy the waters.

"Were the subjects of surveillance under FISA orders?"

Nunes, "It appears so."

So, he unmasked Trump?

[sonofdaxjones]

I have nothing but "if"

'fraid so Bucket.

Hey, I just want a fair investigation. However, when the House Intelligence Committee Chairman overseeing the congressional investigation runs to the White House when he gets classified info, which may in fact be illegal. Well, that makes me nervous. As it should everyone in this country.

Sure, but what part was classified?  Oh wait, Dems say it was, so it had to be, right?  (thus the meldown)

What's even scarier is that information that had little or no intelligence value in regards to the real question at hand was widely disseminated (see Obama order) across a number of agencies.   So it's pretty hard to get your "fair" investigation when there's clearly a vast attempt to muddy the waters.

"Were the subjects of surveillance under FISA orders?"

Nunes, "It appears so."

So, he unmasked Trump?

Based on the Obama order, Trump was already "unmasked" across as many as what? 18 intelligence entities (we have about that many)?

Since we're quoting:

“Details about U.S. persons involved in the incoming administration with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reports.”

[bucket]

I have nothing but "if"

'fraid so Bucket.

Hey, I just want a fair investigation. However, when the House Intelligence Committee Chairman overseeing the congressional investigation runs to the White House when he gets classified info, which may in fact be illegal. Well, that makes me nervous. As it should everyone in this country.

Sure, but what part was classified?  Oh wait, Dems say it was, so it had to be, right?  (thus the meldown)

What's even scarier is that information that had little or no intelligence value in regards to the real question at hand was widely disseminated (see Obama order) across a number of agencies.   So it's pretty hard to get your "fair" investigation when there's clearly a vast attempt to muddy the waters.

"Were the subjects of surveillance under FISA orders?"

Nunes, "It appears so."

So, he unmasked Trump?

Based on the Obama order, Trump was already "unmasked" across as many as what? 18 intelligence entities (we have about that many)?

Since we're quoting:

“Details about U.S. persons involved in the incoming administration with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reports.”

First, what proof do you have of Trump being unmasked? Disseminating intelligence doesn't mean individuals were unmasked. In fact, it has been reported Nunes unmasked Trump because he knew who it was when overseeing intelligence. Not because Trump had in fact been unmasked.

[sonofdaxjones]

I have nothing but "if"

'fraid so Bucket.

Hey, I just want a fair investigation. However, when the House Intelligence Committee Chairman overseeing the congressional investigation runs to the White House when he gets classified info, which may in fact be illegal. Well, that makes me nervous. As it should everyone in this country.

Sure, but what part was classified?  Oh wait, Dems say it was, so it had to be, right?  (thus the meldown)

What's even scarier is that information that had little or no intelligence value in regards to the real question at hand was widely disseminated (see Obama order) across a number of agencies.   So it's pretty hard to get your "fair" investigation when there's clearly a vast attempt to muddy the waters.

"Were the subjects of surveillance under FISA orders?"

Nunes, "It appears so."

So, he unmasked Trump?

Based on the Obama order, Trump was already "unmasked" across as many as what? 18 intelligence entities (we have about that many)?

Since we're quoting:

“Details about U.S. persons involved in the incoming administration with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reports.”

First, what proof do you have of Trump being unmasked? Disseminating intelligence doesn't mean individuals were unmasked. In fact, it has been reported Nunes unmasked Trump because he knew who it was when overseeing intelligence. Not because Trump had in fact been unmasked.

The only people who are saying Nunes was out-of-bounds are people who hate Trump.  They're desperate.

[bucket]

I have nothing but "if"

'fraid so Bucket.

Hey, I just want a fair investigation. However, when the House Intelligence Committee Chairman overseeing the congressional investigation runs to the White House when he gets classified info, which may in fact be illegal. Well, that makes me nervous. As it should everyone in this country.

Sure, but what part was classified?  Oh wait, Dems say it was, so it had to be, right?  (thus the meldown)

What's even scarier is that information that had little or no intelligence value in regards to the real question at hand was widely disseminated (see Obama order) across a number of agencies.   So it's pretty hard to get your "fair" investigation when there's clearly a vast attempt to muddy the waters.

"Were the subjects of surveillance under FISA orders?"

Nunes, "It appears so."

So, he unmasked Trump?

Based on the Obama order, Trump was already "unmasked" across as many as what? 18 intelligence entities (we have about that many)?

Since we're quoting:

“Details about U.S. persons involved in the incoming administration with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reports.”

First, what proof do you have of Trump being unmasked? Disseminating intelligence doesn't mean individuals were unmasked. In fact, it has been reported Nunes unmasked Trump because he knew who it was when overseeing intelligence. Not because Trump had in fact been unmasked.

The only people who are saying Nunes was out-of-bounds are people who hate Trump.  They're desperate.

Seriously, when you are overseeing an investigation and run to the ring leader of the group being investigated that's not... Bizzare?

What if Trey Gowdy went and met with Hillz before her hearing?

[SdK]

Not worth your time, bucket.

[sonofdaxjones]

I have nothing but "if"

'fraid so Bucket.

Hey, I just want a fair investigation. However, when the House Intelligence Committee Chairman overseeing the congressional investigation runs to the White House when he gets classified info, which may in fact be illegal. Well, that makes me nervous. As it should everyone in this country.

Sure, but what part was classified?  Oh wait, Dems say it was, so it had to be, right?  (thus the meldown)

What's even scarier is that information that had little or no intelligence value in regards to the real question at hand was widely disseminated (see Obama order) across a number of agencies.   So it's pretty hard to get your "fair" investigation when there's clearly a vast attempt to muddy the waters.

"Were the subjects of surveillance under FISA orders?"

Nunes, "It appears so."

So, he unmasked Trump?

Based on the Obama order, Trump was already "unmasked" across as many as what? 18 intelligence entities (we have about that many)?

Since we're quoting:

“Details about U.S. persons involved in the incoming administration with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value were widely disseminated in intelligence community reports.”

First, what proof do you have of Trump being unmasked? Disseminating intelligence doesn't mean individuals were unmasked. In fact, it has been reported Nunes unmasked Trump because he knew who it was when overseeing intelligence. Not because Trump had in fact been unmasked.

The only people who are saying Nunes was out-of-bounds are people who hate Trump.  They're desperate.

Seriously, when you are overseeing an investigation and run to the ring leader of the group being investigated that's not... Bizzare?

What if Trey Gowdy went and met with Hillz before her hearing?

The "ring leader" interesting words, Bucket?

Do we know Gowdy didn't have any discussions with Clinton's office or staff prior to the hearings?  It is Washington afterall, friend?

[bucket]

I guess a bipartisan investigation means nothing now

[puniraptor]

I used to think Gowdy was cool for sticking it to elites but now I think he is a stupid idiot for pandering to stupid idiots

[sonofdaxjones]

I guess a bipartisan investigation means nothing now

Again weird take.  We had one side of the aisle that spent 8 years either just straight refusing to participate in executive branch oversight and/or trying to stonewall or redirect any attempt of oversight every step of the way. 

Looks like plenty of Dems are engaged now. Weird huh? 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SdK]

How much time has to pass before Dax stops talking about the Obama admin? I can't wait to find out. I may even throw a party with confetti.

[sonofdaxjones]

Another day comes and goes and Sanctions against Russia remain.  Policies regarding Crimea unchanged.  Real accountability of Iran coming to the fore (Russian client state), even though they have $2 billion plus additional in ransom money to spend on Russian weapons and fund terrorists.  Largest buildup of NATO forces in years remains.

#COLUSION


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[chum1]

https://twitter.com/RWPUSA/status/844760167845548032

[The Big Train]

LOCK HIM UP!

[bucket]

https://twitter.com/StevenTDennis/status/844727663554170880

[SdK]

Human centipede has forever ruined that word for me.

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

I thought breitbart died

[Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)]

https://twitter.com/RWPUSA/status/844760167845548032

Take it to the comicon thread. 

[Phil Titola]

I admire Dax and FSD itt...