In Mac's last 4 years he wasn't winning at the level they wanted. However, he won at least 8 games a year each of his last 3 years.
Are we to believe that you have to have losing seasons for years in a row in order to rebuild a team that won 8 a year for the prior 3? To change the culture you have to turn them from being medium level winners to losers?
I get that he had unreasonable critics. I would have hoped that the guaranteed $10M+ would have allowed him to avoid worrying unnecessarily about economic insecurity and maybe just focus on X's and O's.
Strong sealed his fate during his first few weeks when he ran so many players off the team. He turned it into more of a rebuilding job than it needed to be.
Pete, Red McCombs is a racist dickbag. That being said you can make a pretty easy argument to run Charlie. I also think you can make a compelling argument to keep him, I think they are undoubtedly improving, albeit slow. I would have liked if he were allowed to coach this talent he accumulated but he knew the job he took.
RATM, those players were identified as soft TCs, FPs, ETC even before Mack left; others were straight up criminals. He did a great job of building the talent back up in the program, just couldn't get the wins they needed to get.