Author Topic: The Trump Presidency  (Read 1659506 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11196
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #21900 on: Today at 03:56:02 PM »

Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12773
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #21901 on: Today at 03:58:31 PM »
Deserts, empty lots, top of roofs, parking lots, land famers are willing to sell. It's not like they're kicking anyone out to do it. Dax acts like it's taking land to do it. Height of stupidity, but what lese you'd expect from this blog's jester.

So you want farm land used for solar farms? How positively stupid.

As far as the rest, what in the world are you even talking about?  :lol:

Farmland is increasingly being converted to large-scale solar farms, a trend driven by growing demand for renewable energy and economic incentives for landowners, but it sparks debate about the impact on prime agricultural land. While solar farms affect a small fraction of the nation's total farmland, specific regions and prime soils are more affected. The practice of agrivoltaics—co-locating solar panels with agricultural activities like grazing or growing certain crops—offers a potential solution, enabling both energy generation and farming to continue. However, many projects are still being built on land that was previously dedicated solely to crops, leading to concerns about food security and the long-term use of prime agricultural land.

Again . . . if the usual giant derps want to tell themselves that "green" energy is going to meet our needs, then please continue to post so I can  :lol: at you.
lmao the non-bolded text betrays your entire point. Also how did you possibly obtain a degree in higher ed without any ability at all to provide or cite sources? To borrow a phrase... 'please don't tell anyone that you went to Kansas State"

Waks . . . confused by "However".

It's very very onbrand

I am going to give waks a break because I understand he was just being his usual weirdo ragey stalkerish self

You should start a Thursday However Ireland edition on the football board bud
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59954
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #21902 on: Today at 04:00:18 PM »
What in the world . . .

Online waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3869
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #21903 on: Today at 04:47:34 PM »
Deserts, empty lots, top of roofs, parking lots, land famers are willing to sell. It's not like they're kicking anyone out to do it. Dax acts like it's taking land to do it. Height of stupidity, but what lese you'd expect from this blog's jester.

So you want farm land used for solar farms? How positively stupid.

As far as the rest, what in the world are you even talking about?  :lol:

Farmland is increasingly being converted to large-scale solar farms, a trend driven by growing demand for renewable energy and economic incentives for landowners, but it sparks debate about the impact on prime agricultural land. While solar farms affect a small fraction of the nation's total farmland, specific regions and prime soils are more affected. The practice of agrivoltaics—co-locating solar panels with agricultural activities like grazing or growing certain crops—offers a potential solution, enabling both energy generation and farming to continue. However, many projects are still being built on land that was previously dedicated solely to crops, leading to concerns about food security and the long-term use of prime agricultural land.

Again . . . if the usual giant derps want to tell themselves that "green" energy is going to meet our needs, then please continue to post so I can  :lol: at you.
lmao the non-bolded text betrays your entire point. Also how did you possibly obtain a degree in higher ed without any ability at all to provide or cite sources? To borrow a phrase... 'please don't tell anyone that you went to Kansas State"

Waks . . . confused by "However".

It's very very onbrand

I am going to give waks a break because I understand he was just being his usual weirdo ragey stalkerish self
weird, everything I said went over your head. Shocker. Furthermore, responding to your inane posts on a public message board isn't stalking you, you lunatic

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59954
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #21904 on: Today at 05:14:43 PM »
Nearly every post on this blog is in response to me you whack-a-doo

1. I already fully understood that there were hybrid uses of land that had solar farms - to say otherwise would be disingenuous - I can read, why they eff wouldn't I edit the non highlighted part out if I didn't want it seen?

2. That doesn't change anything - there are still concerns in many areas and within our own Dept of Ag about "green energy" encroachment on productive land . . . thus the "however".

My gawd . . . you guys are so raged up these days I digress, because that's a known-known.

Poor usage of arable - productive ag lands isn't even the primary point you dumbass. The primary point is that green energy is not going to meet our needs, so why are we taking perfectly good land for growing food and grazing livestock and putting solar farms on it?







« Last Edit: Today at 05:22:35 PM by sonofdaxjones »

Online waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3869
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #21905 on: Today at 05:20:47 PM »
Nearly every post on this blog is in response to me you whack-a-doo
well that's not even close to factual and would be really easy to check if you looked at the stats tab but you're also one of the most dishonest and least self-aware people I've ever encountered so I'd expect nothing less

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59954
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #21906 on: Today at 05:23:27 PM »
Nearly every post on this blog is in response to me you whack-a-doo
well that's not even close to factual and would be really easy to check if you looked at the stats tab but you're also one of the most dishonest and least self-aware people I've ever encountered so I'd expect nothing less

I just looked at your post list - the first page, when you post on this board are almost all in response to me.

You're a complete whack-a-doo, dude, just accept it.


Offline DaBigTrain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12773
  • stuxnet, meltdown, spectre, Bitcoin, ffChamp
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #21907 on: Today at 05:26:43 PM »
Yikes. Somebody is needing attention REALLY badly right now. It's just so sad  :frown:
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"

https://blockstream.info/block/000000000019d6689c085ae165831e934ff763ae46a2a6c172b3f1b60a8ce26f

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59954
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #21908 on: Today at 05:32:02 PM »
DuhBigPsycho has proven to us before that and he continues to prove it to us all now - that he cannot tolerate differing opinions and to make it worse, he apparently can't read the numerous posts either coming @me or responding to me.

It's the damnedest weirdest thing ever - even for that weirdo.


Online waks

  • this blog's dick pic expert
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3869
  • Aggieville's Original Gastropub
    • View Profile
Re: The Trump Presidency
« Reply #21909 on: Today at 05:51:54 PM »
Nearly every post on this blog is in response to me you whack-a-doo
well that's not even close to factual and would be really easy to check if you looked at the stats tab but you're also one of the most dishonest and least self-aware people I've ever encountered so I'd expect nothing less

I just looked at your post list - the first page, when you post on this board are almost all in response to me.

You're a complete whack-a-doo, dude, just accept it.
7 out of the last 25 and six within the last three hours (so literally this conversation) but hey, don't let the truth get in the way of your bullshit  :thumbsup:

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88792
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile