Author Topic: Stanford Predictions  (Read 14436 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hurricane Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1478
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #50 on: August 29, 2016, 09:28:01 PM »
I've studied.
I've researched.
More study and research (in depth).
Investigations then ensued.
Detailed data analysis conducted.
Statistics and other numbers have been thoroughly processed.
Databases were administered.


Output: 
Mmm Mmm Cats 34
Cardinals 17

I support this learned prediction

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #51 on: August 29, 2016, 10:08:15 PM »

Snyder's Pyjamas 34
Cat's Pyjamas 35

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #52 on: August 30, 2016, 08:53:46 AM »
We are playing the #8 team in the nation, on the road, in our first game (and we are a traditionally slow starting team), with a new quarterback and a new offensive line.  I don't see any way how we even make the game respectable.

stupid trees:  44
feral cats gone wild:  10

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #53 on: August 30, 2016, 08:58:06 AM »
I'm thinking positive, because they lost a lot of valuable trees to the NFL and graduation. We were semi productive, with the worst QB's in the nation last year, and there's gotta be something about Ertz for Snyder to keep coming back to him. Add in Pringle, The D ( A lot of returning parts), and i'm fully torqued.

Online Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53907
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #54 on: August 30, 2016, 10:33:19 AM »
wants to be harvard - 23
wants to be Texas - 22

Offline pvegs

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2198
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #55 on: August 30, 2016, 10:33:32 AM »
We are playing the #8 team in the nation, on the road, in our first game (and we are a traditionally slow starting team), with a new quarterback and a new offensive line.  I don't see any way how we even make the game respectable.

stupid trees:  44
feral cats gone wild:  10

it could be respectable if we are better and they are worse than preseason predictions, and i think both those things will be true

oh, and cats 27 - trees 24

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13505
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #56 on: August 30, 2016, 10:38:16 AM »
It will be a game that does not greatly impact the rest of our season.

Offline That_Guy

  • I'm just, "That Guy!"
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2790
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #57 on: August 30, 2016, 10:39:28 AM »
It will be a game that does not greatly impact the rest of our season.

Even if we win?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13505
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #58 on: August 30, 2016, 10:40:13 AM »
It will be a game that does not greatly impact the rest of our season.

Even if we win?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
yes.

Offline Art Vandelay

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 88
  • this guy...this guy fucks
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #59 on: August 30, 2016, 10:40:42 AM »
I'm getting more optimistic....meaning I think we lose by 13 now instead of 20

Stanford 30
KSU 17 (WE COVER!!!!!!)

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5676
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #60 on: August 30, 2016, 10:45:54 AM »
We are playing the #8 team in the nation, on the road, in our first game (and we are a traditionally slow starting team), with a new quarterback and a new offensive line.  I don't see any way how we even make the game respectable.

stupid trees:  44
feral cats gone wild:  10

Emo, what if I told you Stanford has traditionally been a slow starting team under David Shaw.. AND they have a new quarterback too?

Offline manpow5

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1886
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #61 on: August 30, 2016, 10:50:27 AM »
wants to be harvard - 23
wants to be Texas - 22

So that's a W for us! #Harvardoftheplains


To EMAW or Not to EMAW

Offline jeans

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 93
  • The Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #62 on: August 30, 2016, 12:17:48 PM »
not sure who will win but it's going to be 26-23

*jeans*
recently came back to the US of A

Offline everyone shut up

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1051
  • “On paper, we feel good.”
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #63 on: August 30, 2016, 12:21:25 PM »
what's OBz record vs. top 10 teams? that should be all you need to know.

Offline jeans

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 93
  • The Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #64 on: August 30, 2016, 12:22:32 PM »
what's OBz record vs. top 10 teams? that should be all you need to know.
already have my cat dick out; ready to party then

*jeans*
recently came back to the US of A

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #65 on: August 30, 2016, 12:24:31 PM »
what's OBz record vs. top 10 teams? that should be all you need to know.
Like 85-90% of coaches at the FBS level have a losing record vs top 10 teams, so I think this is kind of a dumbass road to go down.  :th_twocents:

Offline ben ji

  • Senior Moderator
  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 12302
  • Alot of people dont hit on an 18
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #66 on: August 30, 2016, 12:44:37 PM »
CARDINAL SHOCK!!!
Jesse Ertz proves he is a complete badass scoring 4 TD's in the Katz 42-12 victory over #8 Stanford

Offline everyone shut up

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1051
  • “On paper, we feel good.”
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #67 on: August 30, 2016, 12:50:31 PM »
what's OBz record vs. top 10 teams? that should be all you need to know.
Like 85-90% of coaches at the FBS level have a losing record vs top 10 teams, so I think this is kind of a dumbass road to go down.  :th_twocents:
case closed

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5676
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #68 on: August 30, 2016, 01:14:55 PM »
Cats have averaged 34.2 ppg in openers the last 5 years, Trees have averaged 32.4 ppg in openers the last 5 years. Say it's a field goal difference in favor of Stanford for their crab cake eating snoozer of a home field advantage and you get:

Cats: 33 (32.7)
Cards: 34 (33.9)

Cause math. But if something bounces K-State's way, Cats get the W.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #69 on: August 30, 2016, 01:25:52 PM »
These predictions are horseshit!


Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #70 on: August 30, 2016, 01:29:55 PM »

Offline GONNATEAMKILLU

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #71 on: August 30, 2016, 01:52:11 PM »
We are playing the #8 team in the nation, on the road, in our first game (and we are a traditionally slow starting team), with a new quarterback and a new offensive line.  I don't see any way how we even make the game respectable.

stupid trees:  44
feral cats gone wild:  10

Emo, what if I told you Stanford has traditionally been a slow starting team under David Shaw.. AND they have a new quarterback too?

Has the makings of a great 30 for 30 short.

Offline BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1423
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #72 on: August 30, 2016, 01:59:19 PM »
What does the SNOWBRAG have to say?

 :dunno: :impatient:

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #73 on: August 30, 2016, 02:00:13 PM »
We are playing the #8 team in the nation, on the road, in our first game (and we are a traditionally slow starting team), with a new quarterback and a new offensive line.  I don't see any way how we even make the game respectable.

stupid trees:  44
feral cats gone wild:  10

Emo, what if I told you Stanford has traditionally been a slow starting team under David Shaw.. AND they have a new quarterback too?

THEN, I would say:

1)  They have the best player in the nation.
2)  Our defense is not designed to stop their offense.  Which is somewhat a ridiculous statement but only because last year our defense couldn't stop the offenses it was designed to stop.

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Stanford Predictions
« Reply #74 on: August 30, 2016, 03:23:02 PM »
We are playing the #8 team in the nation, on the road, in our first game (and we are a traditionally slow starting team), with a new quarterback and a new offensive line.  I don't see any way how we even make the game respectable.

stupid trees:  44
feral cats gone wild:  10

Emo, what if I told you Stanford has traditionally been a slow starting team under David Shaw.. AND they have a new quarterback too?

THEN, I would say:

1)  They have the best player in the nation.
2)  Our defense is not designed to stop their offense.  Which is somewhat a ridiculous statement but only because last year our defense couldn't stop the offenses it was designed to stop.

This might sound wrong, but aren't we setup to be really good against the run this year?