0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
At what point does "performing the sexual act" transition to "real attraction"?
Quote from: Fedor on May 06, 2016, 10:04:53 PMQuote from: michigancat on May 06, 2016, 10:00:55 PMWhere would a closeted homosexual male who marries a woman and raises a family fall on the spectrum?He is likely forcing himself to act the part without any real attraction to his wife. It is possible to perform the sexual act if stimulated even by someone you are not attracted to. The potential remains to be 0%."real" attraction? How is this defined? At what point does "performing the sexual act" transition to "real attraction"?
Quote from: michigancat on May 06, 2016, 10:00:55 PMWhere would a closeted homosexual male who marries a woman and raises a family fall on the spectrum?He is likely forcing himself to act the part without any real attraction to his wife. It is possible to perform the sexual act if stimulated even by someone you are not attracted to. The potential remains to be 0%.
Where would a closeted homosexual male who marries a woman and raises a family fall on the spectrum?
Quote from: michigancat on May 06, 2016, 10:02:01 PMQuote from: Fedor on May 06, 2016, 09:58:00 PMQuote from: Chingon on May 06, 2016, 09:54:04 PMLook you are clearly upset so I will let you mark me down as 91.74% You are obviously a terrible scientist. The results are contrary to previously held belief so you are rejecting them. Your "response" is close enough to the truth,but also well below the hypothesis so as not to confirm.Where are these results you speak of?Chings personal percentage. I realize for some this is unfair, I think I should quit asking and putting people on the spot.
Quote from: Fedor on May 06, 2016, 09:58:00 PMQuote from: Chingon on May 06, 2016, 09:54:04 PMLook you are clearly upset so I will let you mark me down as 91.74% You are obviously a terrible scientist. The results are contrary to previously held belief so you are rejecting them. Your "response" is close enough to the truth,but also well below the hypothesis so as not to confirm.Where are these results you speak of?
Quote from: Chingon on May 06, 2016, 09:54:04 PMLook you are clearly upset so I will let you mark me down as 91.74% You are obviously a terrible scientist. The results are contrary to previously held belief so you are rejecting them. Your "response" is close enough to the truth,but also well below the hypothesis so as not to confirm.
Look you are clearly upset so I will let you mark me down as 91.74%
Quote from: michigancat on May 06, 2016, 10:00:55 PMWhere would a closeted homosexual male who marries a woman and raises a family fall on the spectrum?you are really bad at this thread.in the absence of any other relevant info i'd place them on the mean % for adult male homosexuals, whatever it is.
We're probably closer in our theories than you are insinuating. I just think you oversimplify the spectrum which leads to your over-clumping around 100%. I think the males would be centered around 90%. But I don't think many at that spot of the spectrum would ever consider actually performing a homosexual act.
Quote from: sys on May 06, 2016, 10:08:11 PMQuote from: michigancat on May 06, 2016, 10:00:55 PMWhere would a closeted homosexual male who marries a woman and raises a family fall on the spectrum?you are really bad at this thread.in the absence of any other relevant info i'd place them on the mean % for adult male homosexuals, whatever it is.We're probably closer in our theories than you are insinuating. I just think you oversimplify the spectrum which leads to your over-clumping around 100%. I think the males would be centered around 90%. But I don't think many at that spot of the spectrum would ever consider actually performing a homosexual act.
Where do you put habitual masturbators on this scale?
Quote from: michigancat on May 06, 2016, 10:08:29 PMAt what point does "performing the sexual act" transition to "real attraction"?it does not follow from the act of masturbation that one is attracted to hands.
Quote from: michigancat on May 06, 2016, 10:13:50 PMWe're probably closer in our theories than you are insinuating. I just think you oversimplify the spectrum which leads to your over-clumping around 100%. I think the males would be centered around 90%. But I don't think many at that spot of the spectrum would ever consider actually performing a homosexual act.i was not insinuating that you and i hold widely divergent guesses on the homogeneity of male sexual attraction (although if you actually think the median would be around 90% homogeneous, then we do). i'm stating that you have pursued some weird and illogical lines of thought in this thread. mostly your question regarding the categorization of someone not attracted to all members of the sex they are attracted to, though some of your others are also a bit wtfish. is your definition of a vegetarian someone that likes all vegetables?
there is a high likelihood that you would be attracted to someone performing a similar act with their hands without knowing whether those hands were male or female.
Quote from: michigancat on May 06, 2016, 10:34:35 PMthere is a high likelihood that you would be attracted to someone performing a similar act with their hands without knowing whether those hands were male or female.i'm starting to wonder if you understand what is meant by the term sexual attraction.
Reread how you defined the percentage
Define it
Quote from: michigancat on May 06, 2016, 10:41:19 PMDefine itattraction, sexual. not synonymous with sexual stimulation.
people (humans) aren't attracted to sexual acts. they may be stimulated by them, but they aren't attracted to the acts themselves.
People are absolutely aroused by witnessing or thinking of sexual acts. Do you separate arousal from attraction? Or do you disagree with my first sentence?
Quote from: sys on May 06, 2016, 11:10:54 PMpeople (humans) aren't attracted to sexual acts. they may be stimulated by them, but they aren't attracted to the acts themselves.Isn't this kind of where fetishism falls?
Quote from: michigancat on May 06, 2016, 11:16:36 PMPeople are absolutely aroused by witnessing or thinking of sexual acts. Do you separate arousal from attraction? Or do you disagree with my first sentence?yes, different, obviously. arousal = stimulation not attraction.
like, you are the only person in the thread that finds the distinction confusing.