Author Topic: Gary Johnson  (Read 28100 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #200 on: September 29, 2016, 10:02:05 AM »
yeah, I think GJ may be pretty dumb. 


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #201 on: September 29, 2016, 10:04:12 AM »
#LetHimDebate  :lol: JK, this guy sucks too.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16027
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #202 on: September 29, 2016, 10:12:18 AM »
GJ is definitely not dumb, but he's on the low end of the contemporaneous speaking scale. I wouldn't expect an amazing debate performance from him, but just being on the stage I think would force the other candidates to focus on the issues.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16027
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #203 on: September 29, 2016, 10:14:14 AM »
Also, the guy has been very public about his desire to cut down on the interventionalism that has cost us lives and ridiculous amounts of money. Fair to say he's not as interested in foreign policy as Hillary or Trump.

Offline Mrs. Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9975
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #204 on: September 29, 2016, 10:23:25 AM »
GJ is definitely not dumb, but he's on the low end of the contemporaneous speaking scale. I wouldn't expect an amazing debate performance from him, but just being on the stage I think would force the other candidates to focus on the issues.

Did you see the interview where he talked while biting his tongue and said that if he talked like that the whole debate he will still go up in polls?  :lol:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #205 on: September 29, 2016, 10:27:57 AM »
Who would you guys have said? I probably would have gone with Merkel.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16027
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #206 on: September 29, 2016, 10:45:51 AM »
Weld's answers were as good as you could do. First start with the dead guy because everyone is saying nice things about him, then a generally well known and respected woman leader (Merkel).

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #207 on: September 29, 2016, 10:48:10 AM »
I didn't see the part where Weld answered the question. Who was the dead guy he picked?

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #208 on: September 29, 2016, 11:11:09 AM »
he should have said he shares Hillary's admiration for Chairman Mao

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #209 on: September 29, 2016, 11:12:23 AM »
Who would you guys have said? I probably would have gone with Merkel.

Trudeau

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16027
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #210 on: September 29, 2016, 11:24:54 AM »
I didn't see the part where Weld answered the question. Who was the dead guy he picked?

The former Israeli prime minister. Too lazy to look up his name.

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #211 on: September 29, 2016, 12:02:25 PM »
shimon peres. probably only knew the guys name because he had died the day before. they both failed miserably until weld managed to weakly say merkel.

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29366
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #212 on: September 29, 2016, 12:35:31 PM »
i would've gone with nieto, because i just read sys' thread and remember that dude's name now.  merkel would've come second

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #213 on: September 29, 2016, 01:30:18 PM »
It's not a question you expect to get asked, so I think it's fair for it to take a little bit longer to answer. Not being able to come up with anyone is pretty bad, though.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16962
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #214 on: September 29, 2016, 01:50:21 PM »

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #215 on: September 29, 2016, 01:51:22 PM »
As someone not running for President, I would struggle to come up with a name. If I did pull Merkel or someone out of my ass, I wouldn't be able to answer why.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38007
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #217 on: September 29, 2016, 01:53:34 PM »
As someone not running for President, I would struggle to come up with a name. If I did pull Merkel or someone out of my ass, I wouldn't be able to answer why.

Well, Gary doesn't really believe he has a chance to ever be president, so why bother studying up on foreign policy?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38078
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #218 on: September 29, 2016, 02:22:03 PM »
It's a lose/lose, imo. 

I mean, he looks like an idiot right not, but if you throw one out, you are aligning yourself with someone else's body of work that you probably only actually know 20% of.  Then, you can get picked apart forever afterward with everyone of their mistakes and stances.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #219 on: September 29, 2016, 03:08:50 PM »
the media coverage of this has been unfair/stupid, imo.  they claim he didn't know the name of a single foreign leader.  however, the question was not name any foreign leader.  it was fairly obvious to me, both in real time and in replays of the clip, that he was thinking of a specific person that he felt was at least adequate in the being admirable category but could not recall his name rather than casting about hopelessly for any name of any leader.

that happens to me about every five minutes, so i'm pretty sympathetic, but even if it didn't i would not conclude anything about his intelligence or ignorance based on forgetting fox's name.

i also think fox is a semi-decent name to pull out.  wasn't terribly effective, but very charismatic and spearheaded the movement that ended the pri's nearly century-long grip on power in mexico.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55959
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #220 on: September 29, 2016, 03:14:52 PM »
definitely a weird question, but Weld showed it wasn't an impossible one to answer.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #221 on: September 29, 2016, 03:24:04 PM »
definitely a weird question, but Weld showed it wasn't an impossible one to answer.

is merkel really the leader he most admires, or just a leader whose name he was able to recall?
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #222 on: September 29, 2016, 03:27:41 PM »
I think Chris Matthews saw Johnson's Aleppo answer, said, "Hey, I bet this guys doesn't ever read or follow the news much and can't even name a foreign leader," and was 100% correct. That's totally his style.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67440
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #223 on: September 29, 2016, 03:38:25 PM »
so don't ask for proof but i heard on the radio once that gary approaches the president/vp relationship more like a sharing of duties and defers to weld on certain topics.  i don't know what topics those are, but sounds like foreigners is one of them maybe idk.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16027
    • View Profile
Re: Gary Johnson
« Reply #224 on: October 01, 2016, 08:34:49 AM »
so don't ask for proof but i heard on the radio once that gary approaches the president/vp relationship more like a sharing of duties and defers to weld on certain topics.  i don't know what topics those are, but sounds like foreigners is one of them maybe idk.

Pretty sure this was from their 60 minutes interview FWIW.