Did you read the article? This isn't about children. While some of the victims are children, many arent. The age of the victims is not the controlling aspect, here. Read the article before commenting next time, please.
You are reaching for a distinction to avoid the obvious truth. I read the article, and I never said that the age of the victims were the controlling factor. I focused on the children because people should be naturally (biologically, even) most attuned to protecting children, so how they treat children is a good metric.
My point is that a culture that does not respect the lives of children and the unborn is unlikely to have much respect for life in general. When "societies" decide to do monstruous things "for the greater good" - like forced abortion - life and dignity are devalued. When life and dignity are devalued, and morality is more or less non-existent, it leads to an epidemic of "hit and kill," regardless of age. That life is worth far less than the risk of paying money damages.