Author Topic: Justin Silmon  (Read 6386 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Bread

  • We Gave You Bruce
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 7867
  • I've distressing news.
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #25 on: May 29, 2015, 03:37:47 PM »
i am a huge proponent of having a fantastic body, but it doesn't mean a rough ridin' thing when you're 5'4" and fully grown.  gross.

be the best 5'4 you can be

but he is listed at 5'10", which is fairly average as humans go and absolutely towering as kstate rb's go

the only things towering are the lies about his height. 
My prescience is fully engorged.  It throbs with righteous accuracy.  I am sated.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21336
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #26 on: May 29, 2015, 03:50:26 PM »
can you conspiracy ms paint up some scale on that photo to #debunk the roster data?

Offline i poo crabs

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 961
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #27 on: May 29, 2015, 04:13:07 PM »
enough with the 5'4 talk

Lockett measured in a shade under 5'10 at the combine.  Here's Justin with Lockett, Barnett, and Cre

https://twitter.com/Just_in_case_S/status/550805036515991554

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21336
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #28 on: May 29, 2015, 04:16:58 PM »
5'10 in sneaks. the science is settled.

Offline i poo crabs

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 961
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #29 on: May 29, 2015, 04:47:39 PM »
5'10 in sneaks. the science is settled.

Lockett was measured at a tad under 5'10 WITHOUT sneaks, so it looks like Justin is right around 5'10 WITHOUT sneaks as well

Offline slobber

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12427
  • Gonna win 'em all!
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #30 on: May 29, 2015, 04:53:25 PM »
That's 6ft where I come from.


Gonna win 'em all!

Offline meow meow

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11104
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #31 on: May 29, 2015, 08:20:52 PM »
He's the perfect size for a running back, and therefore my new favorite player.

Offline i poo crabs

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 961
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #32 on: May 29, 2015, 08:46:31 PM »
somebody said 9 months ago that Silmon was a stud, like Warmack was a dud.  Can't remember who, but that guy deserves a  :cheers:

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12816
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #33 on: May 29, 2015, 09:18:10 PM »
In a couple of years, these guys, Silmon & Warmack, are going to be logger heads.  I pity the sucker who tries to tackle either one of these guys.  If you like a running game, you'll see it with Banks, Delton, and the logger heads.  :billdance:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline troubledscribe

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1674
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #34 on: May 29, 2015, 09:21:07 PM »
somebody said 9 months ago that Silmon was a stud, like Warmack was a dud.  Can't remember who, but that guy deserves a  :cheers:

You are welcome.

Offline CyberToothCat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 673
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #35 on: May 29, 2015, 10:16:01 PM »
what our future stud RB looks like



Wow.  Stud.

Is he too muscular?  :dunno:

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9558
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #36 on: May 29, 2015, 11:13:27 PM »
what our future stud RB looks like



Wow.  Stud.

Is he too muscular?  :dunno:

Too muscular?  :lol:

According to the roster he needs 45 pounds before he's Thomas Clayton-esque.

Offline CyberToothCat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 673
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #37 on: May 29, 2015, 11:29:16 PM »
what our future stud RB looks like



Wow.  Stud.

Is he too muscular?  :dunno:

Too muscular?  :lol:

According to the roster he needs 45 pounds before he's Thomas Clayton-esque.

Wasn't Clayton like 5 or 6 inches taller?

Offline bucket

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9558
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #38 on: May 30, 2015, 04:28:17 AM »
what our future stud RB looks like



Wow.  Stud.

Is he too muscular?  :dunno:

Too muscular?  :lol:

According to the roster he needs 45 pounds before he's Thomas Clayton-esque.

Wasn't Clayton like 5 or 6 inches taller?

According to the k-state football roster they are the same height. You guys keep debatin' Silmon's height  :gocho:

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36686
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #39 on: May 30, 2015, 10:11:29 AM »
That ball was totally one of those little balls that you buy at souvenir gift shops.  If you look super close, it probably has Dara ' s on the side of it.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30431
    • View Profile
Re: Justin Silmon
« Reply #40 on: May 30, 2015, 12:11:40 PM »
One thing is for sure, that new training table is helping us grow monsters.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best