0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: puniraptor on May 29, 2015, 03:22:21 PMQuote from: Mr Bread on May 29, 2015, 03:05:40 PMi am a huge proponent of having a fantastic body, but it doesn't mean a rough ridin' thing when you're 5'4" and fully grown. gross. be the best 5'4 you can bebut he is listed at 5'10", which is fairly average as humans go and absolutely towering as kstate rb's go
Quote from: Mr Bread on May 29, 2015, 03:05:40 PMi am a huge proponent of having a fantastic body, but it doesn't mean a rough ridin' thing when you're 5'4" and fully grown. gross. be the best 5'4 you can be
i am a huge proponent of having a fantastic body, but it doesn't mean a rough ridin' thing when you're 5'4" and fully grown. gross.
5'10 in sneaks. the science is settled.
somebody said 9 months ago that Silmon was a stud, like Warmack was a dud. Can't remember who, but that guy deserves a
what our future stud RB looks like
Quote from: i poo crabs on May 29, 2015, 12:16:28 AMwhat our future stud RB looks like Wow. Stud. Is he too muscular?
Quote from: CyberToothCat on May 29, 2015, 10:16:01 PMQuote from: i poo crabs on May 29, 2015, 12:16:28 AMwhat our future stud RB looks like Wow. Stud. Is he too muscular? Too muscular? According to the roster he needs 45 pounds before he's Thomas Clayton-esque.
Quote from: bucket on May 29, 2015, 11:13:27 PMQuote from: CyberToothCat on May 29, 2015, 10:16:01 PMQuote from: i poo crabs on May 29, 2015, 12:16:28 AMwhat our future stud RB looks like Wow. Stud. Is he too muscular? Too muscular? According to the roster he needs 45 pounds before he's Thomas Clayton-esque.Wasn't Clayton like 5 or 6 inches taller?