HerrSonntag, PandaXpanda and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
should easily get this thing to 1k pages
Neinas said on BITB Tuesday that we'd stay at 10 b/c that's what the teams in the b12 wanted.
Quote from: pissclams on January 26, 2012, 05:29:53 PMNeinas said on BITB Tuesday that we'd stay at 10 b/c that's what the teams in the b12 wanted.what every conference said prior to expansion
"Son. This is why we are wildcats. Hard work, pride, the heart of this country. And if that's not enough for you, you can just move to California with your punk friends."
Quote from: pissclams on January 26, 2012, 05:29:53 PMNeinas said on BITB Tuesday that we'd stay at 10 b/c that's what the teams in the b12 wanted.WTF was with that interview anyway? The portion I listened to Neinas sounded like he was under oath or something. Very non-committal and vague on everything sidestepped a lot of questions. Very non-Neinas like. Does he just hate KK or something?
Quote from: Rams on January 26, 2012, 09:37:12 PMQuote from: pissclams on January 26, 2012, 05:29:53 PMNeinas said on BITB Tuesday that we'd stay at 10 b/c that's what the teams in the b12 wanted.WTF was with that interview anyway? The portion I listened to Neinas sounded like he was under oath or something. Very non-committal and vague on everything sidestepped a lot of questions. Very non-Neinas like. Does he just hate KK or something? His stance on 16 team conferences was pretty firm, "you can put that idea in a closet and lock it away." I also determined that from his talks with other commissioners that they feel that way too.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/story/2012-01-29/ncaa-division-I-structure-football/52875162/1Hmmmm.......
Quote from: Houstoncat93 on January 29, 2012, 10:49:23 PMhttp://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/story/2012-01-29/ncaa-division-I-structure-football/52875162/1Hmmmm.......I say we call them divisions 1-A, 1-B, and 1-C.
Disparities in the 120-member bowl subdivision have grown increasingly pronounced since then. Individual schools' athletics revenues ranged from $3.8 million to nearly $144 million in 2010, according to the NCAA, prompting the less wealthy to lean more heavily on student fees and other institutional subsidization to try to stay competitive.
QuoteDisparities in the 120-member bowl subdivision have grown increasingly pronounced since then. Individual schools' athletics revenues ranged from $3.8 million to nearly $144 million in 2010, according to the NCAA, prompting the less wealthy to lean more heavily on student fees and other institutional subsidization to try to stay competitive.We can talk about TV markets and everything going forward, but the truth is that the next cutoff is going to be schools who are willing to ante up for a seat at the table.
Sad for the rabid San Jose State fans of the world.
Quote from: Panjandrum on January 30, 2012, 10:17:47 AMQuoteDisparities in the 120-member bowl subdivision have grown increasingly pronounced since then. Individual schools' athletics revenues ranged from $3.8 million to nearly $144 million in 2010, according to the NCAA, prompting the less wealthy to lean more heavily on student fees and other institutional subsidization to try to stay competitive.We can talk about TV markets and everything going forward, but the truth is that the next cutoff is going to be schools who are willing to ante up for a seat at the table.Where do we sit in this discussion?