Author Topic: Smoke your cigars and enjoy the band while you can.... (Read 4966872 times)

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #15675 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:22:11 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on October 06, 2011, 12:18:17 PM

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on October 06, 2011, 12:17:25 PM
Sure it's debateable, thanks Captain Obvious . . . some of you have clearly never had to sell or market anything in your life.

we shouldn't have to sell or market a new team to ourselves

It has nothing to do with selling or marketing TCU. It has everything to do with selling K-State in the most important recruiting state in the conference. Why do you think Missouri does so well in Texas recruiting, why did we do pretty good back when we were good. Yes, the most important thing was that we were good, and two, we played the hell out of telling kids who were good players but not quite good enough for the big Texas schools that they'll have multiple chances for their revenge. I'll take legit 3 star Texas kids all day and twice on Sunday.

steve dave · « **Reply #15676 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:23:03 PM »

oh, ok. we were already able to say that though. nothing has changed for the better there imo.

steve dave · « **Reply #15677 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:23:32 PM »

Quote from: wabash909 on October 06, 2011, 12:21:28 PM

Quote from: steve dave on October 06, 2011, 12:16:04 PM
well, as long as we add Louisville and BYU to get to 12 I'm pretty content.

Agree with this.

But would also take West Virginia when Missouri bolts.

yeah

Ira Hayes · « **Reply #15678 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:24:04 PM »

We now have the 6 core teams that we will have to build our new conference around. TCU is definitely good for us.

Dr Rick Daris · « **Reply #15679 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:24:34 PM »

it's not hard to tell which way dax will go on different matters. he's is pro across the board or anti across the board. examples below.

pro currie and athletic dept
anti frank martin
anti ksu golf

this has to do with the athletic dept so you knew dax would be for it.

chum1 · « **Reply #15680 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:26:28 PM »

at least we didn't wait around to see what mizzou is going to do.

theKSU · « **Reply #15681 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:27:17 PM »

Frank loves it. He must have just heard about the 7300 seat arena.

steve dave · « **Reply #15682 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:27:28 PM »

Quote from: chum1 on October 06, 2011, 12:26:28 PM

at least we didn't wait around to see what mizzou is going to do.

yeah, that is nice

EllToPay · « **Reply #15683 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:28:43 PM »

Quote from: chum1 on October 06, 2011, 12:26:28 PM

at least we didn't wait around to see what mizzou is going to do.

yes, very true.

which makes me think byu is still in the fold. go after the sure fire yes while the confy is still in limbo. its obviously more secure with tcu, which will help a byu yes,

Belvis Noland · « **Reply #15684 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:29:34 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on October 06, 2011, 12:08:26 PM

Oh yeah, one more kind of important thing . . . it helps keep the Big 12 together, you know, kind of important if you're K-State.

Would you like the Big 12 to stick together, if it meant going through this mess every year?

TCU just shifts even more power to TX. Obviously, member schools have taken issue with said power strangle hold. See Nebraska, Colorado, A&M, Mizzou, OU, OSU.

Conference decisions are made by simple majority. Unless we add some northern allies, TCU does nothing more than bolster UT and TX power in this conference.

TCU is perfectly acceptable if we expand to 12 and balance out the South power with two Northern schools (Louisville and BYU, for instance).

jtksu · « **Reply #15685 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:30:33 PM »

eff. I actually agree with Dax here.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #15686 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:31:24 PM »

There's a reason why companies hire people with a huge bullet point in their job description "Evangelizing" and it has nothing to do with the Church, and in some cases it's not always to Evangelize that companies products, sometimes it's to spread the word about adaptation of say a particular technology, then the selling of that specific companies product comes later.

If MU goes SEC they along with A&M they are going to be all over Texas, with schools like LSU evangelizing the SEC.

TCU doesn't shift any more power to Texas than what's already there.

skycat · « **Reply #15687 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:37:30 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on October 06, 2011, 11:23:53 AM

TCU's hoops arena holds 7,201

Wow.

TWICE the capacity of Tulane's arena!

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #15688 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:39:06 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on October 06, 2011, 12:31:24 PM

There's a reason why companies hire people with a huge bullet point in their job description "Evangelizing" and it has nothing to do with the Church, and in some cases it's not always to Evangelize that companies products, sometimes it's to spread the word about adaptation of say a particular technology, then the selling of that specific companies product comes later.

If MU goes SEC they along with A&M they are going to be all over Texas, with schools like LSU evangelizing the SEC.

TCU doesn't shift any more power to Texas than what's already there.

Please tell me you are not a churchie.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #15689 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:40:55 PM »

Hopefully after his lunch at Olive Garden UPKS will be reminding MU that they're on the clock.

Limestone, "Evangelizing" is also used in the corporate world, I just saw a job description the other day for a well known technology company, and that was like bullet point number 2, Evangelizing the product to potential partners.

steve dave · « **Reply #15690 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:42:14 PM »

Let's go ahead and invite Louisville and BYU and then keep WV/Cinci on speed dial if MU bails.

goldenticket · « **Reply #15691 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:43:21 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on October 06, 2011, 12:42:14 PM

Let's go ahead and invite Louisville and BYU and then keep WV/Cinci on speed dial if MU bails.

i like this plan

Boom Roasted · « **Reply #15692 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:45:25 PM »

Im

on the TCU decision. They suck at basketball and will get better by being in the XII but be sure you read better as winning 1 or maybe 2 conference games in a few years. They are good at baseball which obviously means nothing other than a little exposure during the CWS and a great time in Omaha. Tickets to the Cats games in FW will be cheap and those games should have a strong

showing. Billy Bobs is a pretty good time and there is no doubting there is some talent in the TCU female fan base.

wetwillie · « **Reply #15693 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:46:53 PM »

Who the eff is chairing the expansion committee

o yea...

ChiComCat · « **Reply #15694 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:50:26 PM »

I think they were the first addition in order to kill the Big East and allow us to prey on their teams in the near future

Belvis Noland · « **Reply #15695 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:51:31 PM »

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on October 06, 2011, 12:31:24 PM

TCU doesn't shift any more power to Texas than what's already there.

Well that's comforting. Oh wait, the power that "is already there" is somewhat problematic. See mass exodus from Big XII. See Dallas politics. See Dan Beebe reign of indifference. See League offices moving to Dallas....

As long as TX power dominates this conference, schools "with options" will continue to look elsewhere. This includes OU and OSU.

I'd like to address this problem by balancing out southern dominance with some new voices in the North.

deputy dawg · « **Reply #15696 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:51:39 PM »

TCU's football stadium seats like what, 25,000, which they rarely fill? Excuse post if this has already been complained about.

WillieWatanabe · « **Reply #15697 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:52:44 PM »

Quote from: deputy dawg on October 06, 2011, 12:51:39 PM

TCU's football stadium seats like what, 25,000, which they rarely fill? Excuse post if this has already been complained about.

no. please google it.

catzacker · « **Reply #15698 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:54:51 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on October 06, 2011, 12:42:14 PM

Let's go ahead and invite Louisville and BYU and then keep WV/Cinci on speed dial if MU bails.

shultzy is waiting for the sec to take mu or wvu then that will happen, imo.

i'm not melting down over tcu, i don't see why so many are.

steve dave · « **Reply #15699 on:** October 06, 2011, 12:55:33 PM »

Quote from: catzacker on October 06, 2011, 12:54:51 PM

Quote from: steve dave on October 06, 2011, 12:42:14 PM
Let's go ahead and invite Louisville and BYU and then keep WV/Cinci on speed dial if MU bails.

shultzy is waiting for the sec to take mu or wvu then that will happen, imo.

i'm not melting down over tcu, i don't see why so many are.

I'll only be upset if we stop at TCU.