0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
Why would anyone think 11am is worse than 7 pm from a home/traveling/TV watching fan's perspective?
people love getting loaded on fall saturday afternoons vs getting up early on the weekends, seems obvious.
Quote from: meow meow on May 23, 2019, 08:30:49 AMpeople love getting loaded on fall saturday afternoons vs getting up early on the weekends, seems obvious.If you are at home not going to the game, 11 AM doesn’t count as early. 2:30 is clearly superior for tailgating, but 11 is BITB for home entertainment
I'm not awake by 11am most Saturdays.
Lotta people who are bad at both weekends and boozing ITT
the absolute best drunk feeling is early in the day. your body is rested and ready to really process the booze and puts you in top form. as the day gets later your body becomes a lazy pos at booze enjoyment. just a fwiw.
Quote from: 8manpick on May 24, 2019, 02:20:58 PMLotta people who are bad at both weekends and boozing ITT
UConn back to the BigEast & they don't really have a plan for football. Going to trigger some movement when someone from CUSA or SunBelt gets called up to take their place. Or they could just take Army.
LOOKS LIKE THE CONVERSATION IS BEING BROUGHT UP AGAIN! Formation of a Pac-12/Big-12 Strategic Alliance Deemed “Very Likely”UCLA isn’t going to become the Big-12’s 11th member, but one former Big-12 athletic director deemed the eventual formation of a strategic alliance between the Pac-12 and the Big-12 – on tier-one rights (as was first discussed back in ’12) – as “very likely.” The move simply makes too much sense for it not to happen. 24 schools, spread across 4 time zones, would generate the leverage needed to ensure future growth in the value of their collective media rights; and the addition of several new opponents on each school’s home schedule would help to solve college football’s attendance problems (at least in the short-term).
Quote from: Katdaddy on June 24, 2019, 02:49:32 PMLOOKS LIKE THE CONVERSATION IS BEING BROUGHT UP AGAIN! Formation of a Pac-12/Big-12 Strategic Alliance Deemed “Very Likely”UCLA isn’t going to become the Big-12’s 11th member, but one former Big-12 athletic director deemed the eventual formation of a strategic alliance between the Pac-12 and the Big-12 – on tier-one rights (as was first discussed back in ’12) – as “very likely.” The move simply makes too much sense for it not to happen. 24 schools, spread across 4 time zones, would generate the leverage needed to ensure future growth in the value of their collective media rights; and the addition of several new opponents on each school’s home schedule would help to solve college football’s attendance problems (at least in the short-term). Since we're valued at X and they are valued at X-Y and Y is a positive integer, I'm not sure how this will work in our favor if weighted equally between our conference members and their collection of also-rans.