0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Fortunately, as Kansas basketball coach Bill Self told listeners on his weekly radio show yesterday, his Jayhawks' AQ status was never in doubt -- and nor was that of Missouri, KSU, and ISU. When asked about TCU and its move to the Big East, Self said that if the Big 12 folded, those schools would have been offered a spot in the Big East. And further, Self thinks the Big East was smart to make those offers, because it was the only way to ensure the Big Ten doesn't kill the Big East's football program.
1. If you're asking why ESPN is close to finalizing a deal to link up with Texas as its broadcast partner for the new Longhorn television network, for exorbitant figures perhaps approaching $15 million a year, it's because the worldwide leader is hoping to use this platform as a way to leverage with Texas' help a deal to acquire all of the Big 12's television rights that will be negotiated next spring. And, yes, we all know Texas has clout. If the other nine members of the reconfigured Big 12 don't go along, Texas hasn't minded using its power before and could easily reopen talks with the Pac-12 or go independent. ESPN is positioning itself for the inside track with the Big 12 and squeezing out Fox.One very highly placed Big 12 school official told me the other nine schools are holding preliminary discussions about their own networks. To avoid Texas threatening to leave again, the opinion here is the Big 12 must be aggressive and try to strengthen itself against other assaults. That means looking to expand. The Big 12 should go after Arkansas and LSU, Arizona and Arizona State, even Notre Dame. I keep hearing Kansas is talking to the Big East. Who would blame the Jayhawks for looking, since they were nearly left out in the last realignment merry-go-round?
Quote1. If you're asking why ESPN is close to finalizing a deal to link up with Texas as its broadcast partner for the new Longhorn television network, for exorbitant figures perhaps approaching $15 million a year, it's because the worldwide leader is hoping to use this platform as a way to leverage with Texas' help a deal to acquire all of the Big 12's television rights that will be negotiated next spring. And, yes, we all know Texas has clout. If the other nine members of the reconfigured Big 12 don't go along, Texas hasn't minded using its power before and could easily reopen talks with the Pac-12 or go independent. ESPN is positioning itself for the inside track with the Big 12 and squeezing out Fox.One very highly placed Big 12 school official told me the other nine schools are holding preliminary discussions about their own networks. To avoid Texas threatening to leave again, the opinion here is the Big 12 must be aggressive and try to strengthen itself against other assaults. That means looking to expand. The Big 12 should go after Arkansas and LSU, Arizona and Arizona State, even Notre Dame. I keep hearing Kansas is talking to the Big East. Who would blame the Jayhawks for looking, since they were nearly left out in the last realignment merry-go-round?
The plane was in the air!
The Big Ten announced Sunday that it will no longer actively pursue expansion after a 12-month study period.The league's Council of Presidents/Chancellors agreed at its winter meeting to end the expansion study, which was announced last December and scheduled for 12-to-18 months. The Big Ten added Nebraska as its 12th member on June 11, marking the league's first expansion in two decades."We have been thoroughly engaged in the process since last December," said Indiana University president Michael McRobbie, the chair of the Big Ten's Council of Presidents/Chancellors. "Following detailed discussions at today's meeting, my colleagues and I can report that we believe that this process has reached its natural conclusion. We are pleased with the addition of Nebraska and look forward to working with our colleagues there in the years ahead."In a statement, the Big Ten said it will monitor the landscape in college sports but "will not be actively engaged in conference expansion for the foreseeable future and does not expect to be proactively seeking new members."
QuoteThe Big Ten announced Sunday that it will no longer actively pursue expansion after a 12-month study period.The league's Council of Presidents/Chancellors agreed at its winter meeting to end the expansion study, which was announced last December and scheduled for 12-to-18 months. The Big Ten added Nebraska as its 12th member on June 11, marking the league's first expansion in two decades."We have been thoroughly engaged in the process since last December," said Indiana University president Michael McRobbie, the chair of the Big Ten's Council of Presidents/Chancellors. "Following detailed discussions at today's meeting, my colleagues and I can report that we believe that this process has reached its natural conclusion. We are pleased with the addition of Nebraska and look forward to working with our colleagues there in the years ahead."In a statement, the Big Ten said it will monitor the landscape in college sports but "will not be actively engaged in conference expansion for the foreseeable future and does not expect to be proactively seeking new members."
SEC breaks the Billion dollar revenue threshold: Story | ChartsRevenue rankings:1. SEC2. Big 103. Big 124. ACC5. Big East6. Pac-10Probably should be invited to Conference Elite:Top 10 Earners in College Sports2008-9 Revenue (in millions)2009-10 Revenue (in millions)Percent Change1 U. of Texas at Austin138.5 143.63.72 U. of Alabama103.9129.324.43 Ohio State U.119.9123.22.84 U. of Florida108.3116.57.65 Louisiana State U. at Baton Rouge100.1109.99.96 U. of Michigan95.2106.712.17 Pennsylvania State U.96106.611.18 U. of Tennessee92.5100.78.99 U. of Oklahoma81.598.721.110 U. of Wisconsin89.893.94.5
SEC breaks the Billion dollar revenue threshold: Story | ChartsRevenue rankings:1. SEC2. Big 103. Big 124. ACC5. Big East6. Pac-10Probably should be invited to Conference Elite:Top 10 Earners in College Sports2008-9 Revenue (in millions)2009-10 Revenue (in millions)Percent Change1 U. of Texas at Austin138.5 143.63.72 U. of Alabama103.9129.324.43 Ohio State U.119.9123.22.8[/b]4 U. of Florida108.3116.57.65 Louisiana State U. at Baton Rouge100.1109.99.96 U. of Michigan95.2106.712.1[/b]7 Pennsylvania State U.96106.611.1[/b]8 U. of Tennessee92.5100.78.99 U. of Oklahoma81.598.721.110 U. of Wisconsin89.893.94.5[/b]
Quote from: MadCat on December 08, 2010, 11:34:36 AMSEC breaks the Billion dollar revenue threshold: Story | ChartsRevenue rankings:1. SEC2. Big 103. Big 124. ACC5. Big East6. Pac-10Probably should be invited to Conference Elite:Top 10 Earners in College Sports2008-9 Revenue (in millions)2009-10 Revenue (in millions)Percent Change1 U. of Texas at Austin138.5 143.63.72 U. of Alabama103.9129.324.43 Ohio State U.119.9123.22.84 U. of Florida108.3116.57.65 Louisiana State U. at Baton Rouge100.1109.99.96 U. of Michigan95.2106.712.17 Pennsylvania State U.96106.611.18 U. of Tennessee92.5100.78.99 U. of Oklahoma81.598.721.110 U. of Wisconsin89.893.94.5i'm in over my head on this kind of stuff but how do the likes of Alabama and LSU with such low enrollments compete monatarily with the heavy hitters on this list? Is it just a cyclical effect of both teams having recently won National Championships and having been associated with Nick Saban?
Quote from: wetwillie on December 08, 2010, 11:54:00 AMQuote from: MadCat on December 08, 2010, 11:34:36 AMSEC breaks the Billion dollar revenue threshold: Story | ChartsRevenue rankings:1. SEC2. Big 103. Big 124. ACC5. Big East6. Pac-10Probably should be invited to Conference Elite:Top 10 Earners in College Sports2008-9 Revenue (in millions)2009-10 Revenue (in millions)Percent Change1 U. of Texas at Austin138.5 143.63.72 U. of Alabama103.9129.324.43 Ohio State U.119.9123.22.84 U. of Florida108.3116.57.65 Louisiana State U. at Baton Rouge100.1109.99.96 U. of Michigan95.2106.712.17 Pennsylvania State U.96106.611.18 U. of Tennessee92.5100.78.99 U. of Oklahoma81.598.721.110 U. of Wisconsin89.893.94.5i'm in over my head on this kind of stuff but how do the likes of Alabama and LSU with such low enrollments compete monatarily with the heavy hitters on this list? Is it just a cyclical effect of both teams having recently won National Championships and having been associated with Nick Saban?Most likely has to do with the lack of pro teams(saints dont count) in the south/college football is bigger than pro football there. Imagine if all the fans that pack camerohead bought tickets and suites at KSU.
^Mostly this. At a place like Alabama, you have Alabama, Auburn and/or the Jacksonville Jaguars to cheer for football wise. Jaguars have been terrible for a most of their short history and the Alabama/Auburn relationship is much like that of KU/KSU. The vast majority of the people who didn't attend college go for Alabama because of it's deeper history. (This is my guess mostly, and what I've taken from the few people I know from Alabama).
frank the tank's expansion denouement. as always, it's good.http://frankthetank.wordpress.com/2010/12/07/the-settling-conference-realignment-landscape/
While the Big 12 isn’t safe in a warm and fuzzy family way, it looks like it’s safe in a maximum security prison way. No one’s getting out of there even if they want to very badly.
Quote from: ben ji on December 08, 2010, 01:47:45 PMQuote from: wetwillie on December 08, 2010, 11:54:00 AMQuote from: MadCat on December 08, 2010, 11:34:36 AMSEC breaks the Billion dollar revenue threshold: Story | ChartsRevenue rankings:1. SEC2. Big 103. Big 124. ACC5. Big East6. Pac-10Probably should be invited to Conference Elite:Top 10 Earners in College Sports2008-9 Revenue (in millions)2009-10 Revenue (in millions)Percent Change1 U. of Texas at Austin138.5 143.63.72 U. of Alabama103.9129.324.43 Ohio State U.119.9123.22.84 U. of Florida108.3116.57.65 Louisiana State U. at Baton Rouge100.1109.99.96 U. of Michigan95.2106.712.17 Pennsylvania State U.96106.611.18 U. of Tennessee92.5100.78.99 U. of Oklahoma81.598.721.110 U. of Wisconsin89.893.94.5i'm in over my head on this kind of stuff but how do the likes of Alabama and LSU with such low enrollments compete monatarily with the heavy hitters on this list? Is it just a cyclical effect of both teams having recently won National Championships and having been associated with Nick Saban?Most likely has to do with the lack of pro teams(saints dont count) in the south/college football is bigger than pro football there. Imagine if all the fans that pack camerohead bought tickets and suites at KSU. ^Mostly this. At a place like Alabama, you have Alabama, Auburn and/or the Jacksonville Jaguars to cheer for football wise. Jaguars have been terrible for a most of their short history and the Alabama/Auburn relationship is much like that of KU/KSU. The vast majority of the people who didn't attend college go for Alabama because of it's deeper history. (This is my guess mostly, and what I've taken from the few people I know from Alabama).
Quote from: Toupe Tactics Always Fail on December 08, 2010, 02:33:53 PMQuote from: ben ji on December 08, 2010, 01:47:45 PMQuote from: wetwillie on December 08, 2010, 11:54:00 AMQuote from: MadCat on December 08, 2010, 11:34:36 AMSEC breaks the Billion dollar revenue threshold: Story | ChartsRevenue rankings:1. SEC2. Big 103. Big 124. ACC5. Big East6. Pac-10Probably should be invited to Conference Elite:Top 10 Earners in College Sports2008-9 Revenue (in millions)2009-10 Revenue (in millions)Percent Change1 U. of Texas at Austin138.5 143.63.72 U. of Alabama103.9129.324.43 Ohio State U.119.9123.22.84 U. of Florida108.3116.57.65 Louisiana State U. at Baton Rouge100.1109.99.96 U. of Michigan95.2106.712.17 Pennsylvania State U.96106.611.18 U. of Tennessee92.5100.78.99 U. of Oklahoma81.598.721.110 U. of Wisconsin89.893.94.5i'm in over my head on this kind of stuff but how do the likes of Alabama and LSU with such low enrollments compete monatarily with the heavy hitters on this list? Is it just a cyclical effect of both teams having recently won National Championships and having been associated with Nick Saban?Most likely has to do with the lack of pro teams(saints dont count) in the south/college football is bigger than pro football there. Imagine if all the fans that pack camerohead bought tickets and suites at KSU. ^Mostly this. At a place like Alabama, you have Alabama, Auburn and/or the Jacksonville Jaguars to cheer for football wise. Jaguars have been terrible for a most of their short history and the Alabama/Auburn relationship is much like that of KU/KSU. The vast majority of the people who didn't attend college go for Alabama because of it's deeper history. (This is my guess mostly, and what I've taken from the few people I know from Alabama).The Jags are not in Jackson, MS.
Reported divisions for big 10 T1N Conference:Legends: Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota, Nebraska, NorthwesternLeaders: Illinois, Indiana, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, WisconsinLame and Letarded IMO.New Logo