Author Topic: Smoke your cigars and enjoy the band while you can.... (Read 4966927 times)

HerrSonntag · « **Reply #29625 on:** November 07, 2016, 09:08:20 PM »

I have exclusively used other peoples login information for watchESPN since it was still called ESPN3

Trim · « **Reply #29626 on:** November 08, 2016, 03:01:31 AM »

I'm simultaneously a giver and user of espn3 logins. Even Steven. #ethics

Mike from Ft. Collins · « **Reply #29627 on:** November 15, 2016, 01:30:13 PM »

CSU receives big donation.

http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2016/11/15/csu-gets-largest-donation-history/93900622/

ew2x4 · « **Reply #29628 on:** November 15, 2016, 01:38:13 PM »

Quote from: Mike from Ft. Collins on November 15, 2016, 01:30:13 PM

CSU receives big donation.

http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2016/11/15/csu-gets-largest-donation-history/93900622/

IPA4Me · « **Reply #29629 on:** November 15, 2016, 04:40:57 PM »

I hope that I can make a donation like that in twenty-five years.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #29630 on:** November 15, 2016, 05:08:58 PM »

Quote

The College of Engineering will be renamed the Walter Scott, Jr. College of Engineering in his honor.

Rofl, their engineering school is a juco

KITNfury · « **Reply #29631 on:** November 15, 2016, 10:38:59 PM »

HerrSonntag · « **Reply #29632 on:** November 16, 2016, 12:43:18 AM »

Guys worth $3.5B an all he wants to scrape off is $53M? CSUs College of Negotiation needs some pointers

Emo EMAW · « **Reply #29633 on:** November 16, 2016, 09:35:06 AM »

This tells me all I need to know about CSU. They don't care about sports.

MadCat · « **Reply #29634 on:** November 16, 2016, 10:37:10 AM »

How many junior colleges of engineering could there be?

Shooter Jones · « **Reply #29635 on:** November 16, 2016, 10:41:45 AM »

Do you think they had a slide about this guy on their Please Let Us In powerpoint presentation they sent to Nu Logo?

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #29636 on:** November 16, 2016, 01:11:25 PM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on November 02, 2016, 05:19:25 PM

Quote from: ChiCat on November 02, 2016, 04:43:31 PM
I heard someone talk about Disney trying offload ESPN as it has turned into an anchor.

Strange that they haven't just sold an ESPN streaming standalone package. Could probably cut some of their losses.

Because that's incredibly impractical. 33% of Americans do not have high speed internet, 17% of Americans have no access to broadband technology at all. Only 15% of Americans consider themselves cord cutters. As if those numbers on their own aren't enough, you have to also bear in mind that most of those with no broadband access live rurally in the South and Midwest, these by percentage are also the largest consumers of sports and specifically college sports. I don't know this as fact but I'd assume that a large percentage of cord cutters are urban and not as likely to be loyal consumers of sports programming. They are also more likely to fall outside of the target demographic for most advertisers.

You are absolutely losing a hell of a lot more than you gain by making ESPN a streaming only option.

T's & P's

ew2x4 · « **Reply #29637 on:** November 30, 2016, 09:40:10 AM »

http://www.outkickthecoverage.com/espn-loses-another-555-000-subscribers-per-nielsen-112916

I'll just leave this here.

Panjandrum · « **Reply #29638 on:** November 30, 2016, 09:51:18 AM »

It's Clay Travis, but the point is largely true. ESPN isn't going to fold, most likely, but it's going to have to pay less for rights fees, and it's going to have to transition to a more cord-cutter friendly format to augment its current model.

WatchESPN is a fantastic app. They could quickly and easily roll that out to a standalone subscription model as soon as it's capable of doing so based on their current agreements. However, they'll have to cross that tipping point where doing so doesn't anger the cable companies that are relying on them as their tent pole for subscribers.

Hell, once ESPN goes standalone, like HBO, people are going to come off in droves. Fox will be forced to react, so there will be nothing left to keep people on cable unless they're really in love with CNN and Fox News.

steve dave · « **Reply #29639 on:** November 30, 2016, 10:43:58 AM »

I love cable. having 40 different places to go to watch crap seems like a massive PITA and not worth it. I just tell cox to throw in everything and let god sort them out.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #29640 on:** November 30, 2016, 10:51:26 AM »

We are old people now sd

Dr Rick Daris · « **Reply #29641 on:** November 30, 2016, 10:54:59 AM »

I bet you guys also take the paper and wait excitedly for the mail to come everyday. wonder what's in the mail today is what you guys commonly say to each other in passing.

Panjandrum · « **Reply #29642 on:** November 30, 2016, 10:57:31 AM »

Also, I'd keep an eye on the new administration's direction for the FCC on Net Neutrality. A lot of these companies like Time Warner, Comcast, etc. may strike up sweetheart deals so that you get faster speeds for the apps if you're a cable subscriber. Similar to what they did when they slowed down streaming speeds to Netflix before a lot of the hubbub before.

From what I've read, the Trump administration will decrease regulations regarding net neutrality giving the providers more leverage to screw around with stuff like this and not tell us about it.

Panjandrum · « **Reply #29643 on:** November 30, 2016, 10:59:37 AM »

Quote from: steve dave on November 30, 2016, 10:43:58 AM

I love cable. having 40 different places to go to watch crap seems like a massive PITA and not worth it. I just tell cox to throw in everything and let god sort them out.

The operating systems inside of the boxes that will play your apps (i.e. Apple TV, Chromecast, Roku, etc.) will probably be able to eventually sort a lot of that out for you.

Roku already has something kind of like it in their system today. You search what you want to watch, and it will find the app that has it and if you need to pay for it or if the service streams it for free.

For example, if you wanted to watch a movie, you search for it on Roku, then it will tell you if Netflix has it for free or if Vudu will charge you $1.99 to watch it.

Trim · « **Reply #29644 on:** November 30, 2016, 11:03:37 AM »

Streaming's janky.

Skipper44 · « **Reply #29645 on:** November 30, 2016, 11:24:23 AM »

Flipping around to multiple games on a Saturday afternoon is one of my life's great pleasures and cable/sat is the best way to do it. I guess you could come somewhat close to replicating that with 3 or 4 streaming devices but it would still be janky.

yoga-like_abana · « **Reply #29646 on:** November 30, 2016, 11:34:50 AM »

Quote from: Skipper44 on November 30, 2016, 11:24:23 AM

Flipping around to multiple games on a Saturday afternoon is one of my life's great pleasures and cable/sat is the best way to do it. I guess you could come somewhat close to replicating that with 3 or 4 streaming devices but it would still be janky.

pretty easy on sling. unless you are an idiot

nicname · « **Reply #29647 on:** November 30, 2016, 11:35:06 AM »

Cable is worth it just for the convenience and consistent quality of picture.

Blame me for cable companies being able to price gouge. I don't care, I'll pay.

Skipper44 · « **Reply #29648 on:** November 30, 2016, 11:59:34 AM »

Quote from: yoga-like_abana on November 30, 2016, 11:34:50 AM

Quote from: Skipper44 on November 30, 2016, 11:24:23 AM
Flipping around to multiple games on a Saturday afternoon is one of my life's great pleasures and cable/sat is the best way to do it. I guess you could come somewhat close to replicating that with 3 or 4 streaming devices but it would still be janky.
pretty easy on sling. unless you are an idiot

never tried it, does it have a previous button just like cable/sat?

Skipper44 · « **Reply #29649 on:** November 30, 2016, 12:06:04 PM »

Quote from: nicname on November 30, 2016, 11:35:06 AM

Cable is worth it just for the convenience and consistent quality of picture.

Blame me for cable companies being able to price gouge. I don't care, I'll pay.

Totally agree on the picture quality for Direct TV, TimeWarner, Comcast and AT&T are actually worse than a WatchESPN stream imo. If you are willing and able to shop various providers you an keep it under $100/mo pretty easily, that is worth it to me from August to May.