0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: CNS Casey on August 15, 2011, 11:12:52 AMUbben:QuoteDan Beebe told USA Today's Steve Wieberg that the Big 12 is not in a holding pattern, and has plans for alternative situations. He adds, however, that the Big 12 is intent on having 10 members.This means that within a week of A&M leaving, Air Force or Houston will be announced as the tenth member.
Ubben:QuoteDan Beebe told USA Today's Steve Wieberg that the Big 12 is not in a holding pattern, and has plans for alternative situations. He adds, however, that the Big 12 is intent on having 10 members.
Dan Beebe told USA Today's Steve Wieberg that the Big 12 is not in a holding pattern, and has plans for alternative situations. He adds, however, that the Big 12 is intent on having 10 members.
Quote from: Panjandrum on August 15, 2011, 11:16:18 AMQuote from: CNS Casey on August 15, 2011, 11:12:52 AMUbben:QuoteDan Beebe told USA Today's Steve Wieberg that the Big 12 is not in a holding pattern, and has plans for alternative situations. He adds, however, that the Big 12 is intent on having 10 members.This means that within a week of A&M leaving, Air Force or Houston will be announced as the tenth member.Big12 is actively targeting a school, and it's neither of these two.
Quote from: Panjandrum on August 15, 2011, 11:53:52 AMQuote from: sys on August 15, 2011, 11:51:05 AMQuote from: Panjandrum on August 15, 2011, 11:16:18 AMThis means that within a week of A&M leaving, Air Force or Houston will be announced as the tenth member.it'll be byu, if one is needed. houston is just being mentioned to try and threaten aggie - but i doubt if even aggie is stupid enough to believe it.It seems like the best and most obvious choice, but I saw an article this weekend (somewhere) that said BYU wants to stay independent.It may have been crap. I don't know.You are right, they did say that....but SEC also said that they are not adding aTm. People, teams, and conferences say things.
Quote from: sys on August 15, 2011, 11:51:05 AMQuote from: Panjandrum on August 15, 2011, 11:16:18 AMThis means that within a week of A&M leaving, Air Force or Houston will be announced as the tenth member.it'll be byu, if one is needed. houston is just being mentioned to try and threaten aggie - but i doubt if even aggie is stupid enough to believe it.It seems like the best and most obvious choice, but I saw an article this weekend (somewhere) that said BYU wants to stay independent.It may have been crap. I don't know.
Quote from: Panjandrum on August 15, 2011, 11:16:18 AMThis means that within a week of A&M leaving, Air Force or Houston will be announced as the tenth member.it'll be byu, if one is needed. houston is just being mentioned to try and threaten aggie - but i doubt if even aggie is stupid enough to believe it.
This means that within a week of A&M leaving, Air Force or Houston will be announced as the tenth member.
Would Losing aTm and gaining BYU make our conference worth more or less when it comes time for TV negotiations? I can't help but think it would make us more valuable, as UT would still give us the same sets that aTm gives us, while BYU would give us a national audience.
It seems like the best and most obvious choice, but I saw an article this weekend (somewhere) that said BYU wants to stay independent.It may have been crap. I don't know.
BYU would be a great add, really.
Quote from: michigancat on August 15, 2011, 12:04:58 PMBYU would be a great add, really.it would be ridiculously great. like, you would think that the remaining teams would be smart enough to understand that they could make a lot of money (collectively and individually as institutions) if they just stayed together. The big 12 is only "unstable" when these "smart" university presidents and AD's forget this. (I'm looking at you, Missouri).
Quote from: michigancat on August 15, 2011, 12:04:58 PMBYU would be a great add, really.Agreed. crap talking possibilities would be endless.
Quote from: Saulbadguy on August 15, 2011, 12:14:45 PMQuote from: michigancat on August 15, 2011, 12:04:58 PMBYU would be a great add, really.Agreed. crap talking possibilities would be endless. I cannot wait to show up at Lavell Edwards Stadium absolutely shitfaced.
Quote from: catzacker on August 15, 2011, 12:11:18 PMQuote from: michigancat on August 15, 2011, 12:04:58 PMBYU would be a great add, really.it would be ridiculously great. like, you would think that the remaining teams would be smart enough to understand that they could make a lot of money (collectively and individually as institutions) if they just stayed together. The big 12 is only "unstable" when these "smart" university presidents and AD's forget this. (I'm looking at you, Missouri). Speaking of this, is it clear that aTm would make more money in the SEC?
Would have to target ND first, despite being laughed at. After that, BYU.
I hope we can unlock the worst fanbase in america four square badge in our first season with BYU