Author Topic: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV  (Read 9015 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #25 on: February 04, 2015, 11:18:42 PM »
That reminds me, can we talk about how hilarious it is that Vulture started? It's like some beautiful middle school crap, or something Frank would do against FHSU

I was just going to comment on this.

I mean, if that isn't a gigantic white flag on this season, I don't know what is.

oscar's final chess move is to suspend his two best recruits in successive classes on the same day AND start a walk on at point guard in a game that was critical to keeping already incredibly slim hopes of post season dreams alive was just so perfect.

And the fact that Vulture wasn't that much worse than what we've seen was doubly hilarious.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #26 on: February 04, 2015, 11:20:36 PM »
the information available suggests that suspending foster was no more weber's idea than suspending samuels' was martin's idea.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #27 on: February 04, 2015, 11:24:04 PM »
Also, the parts I watched, Jevon was by far the worst defender. And I saw Harris play quite a bit.

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #28 on: February 04, 2015, 11:25:35 PM »
That reminds me, can we talk about how hilarious it is that Vulture started? It's like some beautiful middle school crap, or something Frank would do against FHSU

I was just going to comment on this.

I mean, if that isn't a gigantic white flag on this season, I don't know what is.

oscar's final chess move is to suspend his two best recruits in successive classes on the same day AND start a walk on at point guard in a game that was critical to keeping already incredibly slim hopes of post season dreams alive was just so perfect.

And the fact that Vulture wasn't that much worse than what we've seen was doubly hilarious.

This game really highlighted for me how much oscar doesn't like Bolden.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16962
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #29 on: February 04, 2015, 11:27:47 PM »
Vulture started? holy crap

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #30 on: February 04, 2015, 11:33:48 PM »
Also, the parts I watched, Jevon was by far the worst defender. And I saw Harris play quite a bit.

With the current PG recruiting, and by that I mean us watching every JUCO PG between Vancouver and Miami, shows me how likely we are to showing both Johnson and Thomas the door in the offseason.

It seems like they want Hardinett and a JUCO guy.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #31 on: February 04, 2015, 11:38:35 PM »
The worst defenders tonight, in order, were:
1. Hurt
2. Wes
3. Nino
4. Vulture
Rohlderer was the worst by far. That open 3 to start the game. :frown:

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #32 on: February 04, 2015, 11:43:22 PM »
One of the most infuriating moments of the night was when Jevon's man attempted a steal deep in our back court Jevon beat him badly, only to slow down and let the defender catch up by half court. Didn't affect the game at all, but I was so pissed.

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #33 on: February 05, 2015, 12:02:16 AM »
the information available suggests that suspending foster was no more weber's idea than suspending samuels' was martin's idea.

...?

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #34 on: February 05, 2015, 12:04:45 AM »
One of the most infuriating moments of the night was when Jevon's man attempted a steal deep in our back court Jevon beat him badly, only to slow down and let the defender catch up by half court. Didn't affect the game at all, but I was so pissed.
gotta let that Bruceketball offensive genius game plan work for you!!!!!
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #35 on: February 05, 2015, 12:29:51 AM »
the information available suggests that suspending foster was no more weber's idea than suspending samuels' was martin's idea.

...?

shared in chat by emawnymous as the standard three game suspension for the standard reason bball players are suspended three games.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #36 on: February 05, 2015, 06:52:53 AM »

the information available suggests that suspending foster was no more weber's idea than suspending samuels' was martin's idea.

...?

shared in chat by emawnymous as the standard three game suspension for the standard reason bball players are suspended three games.

This would make some sense.

Offline dal9

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1786
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #37 on: February 05, 2015, 08:43:24 AM »
the information available suggests that suspending foster was no more weber's idea than suspending samuels' was martin's idea.

...?

shared in chat by emawnymous as the standard three game suspension for the standard reason bball players are suspended three games.
cutting in line at the training table?

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #38 on: February 05, 2015, 09:51:32 AM »
the information available suggests that suspending foster was no more weber's idea than suspending samuels' was martin's idea.

...?

shared in chat by emawnymous as the standard three game suspension for the standard reason bball players are suspended three games.
cutting in line at the training table?

"roll it up, light it up, smoke it up, inhale exhale"

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #39 on: February 05, 2015, 09:54:32 AM »
the information available suggests that suspending foster was no more weber's idea than suspending samuels' was martin's idea.

...?

shared in chat by emawnymous as the standard three game suspension for the standard reason bball players are suspended three games.
cutting in line at the training table?

"roll it up, light it up, smoke it up, inhale exhale"

smack it up, flip it, rub it down


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #40 on: February 05, 2015, 03:40:12 PM »
Lay it down, flip it and reverse it

Offline The Whale

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 975
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #41 on: February 05, 2015, 06:57:43 PM »
What kind of shots was the offense trying to generate last night? 

I mean, I watched the game, and I have no idea.  Except for the times that Harris was on the floor, no one really wanted to take a 3.  The lack of FTs show they weren't trying to work it inside.

It looked like the gameplan was to run at least 25 seconds off the clock without any real attempt at a shot, followed by the best guarded 2 that was available.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #42 on: February 05, 2015, 07:24:10 PM »
Early it was get the ball to Gip. Then we tried to get some looks for Nino, but he was launching bricks. Eventually Tech just triple teamed Gip. We tried some penetration, but Jevon and Edwards missed. The only thing that kept it close was a little flurry from Edwards and then Tre. Tre and Edwards got at least 2 more wide open threes down the stretch, but they wouldn't fall and we were done.

Wes really did nothing, and getting no production from him, Nino, or Edwards killed us.

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #43 on: February 05, 2015, 07:54:16 PM »
Man, this team really sucks.  Roehlder should have looked awful compared to the other guys but there was hardly a noticeable difference. What a crap show.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #44 on: February 05, 2015, 08:16:55 PM »
I thought Roehlder looked like a walk on. He was completely no threat to score (at least Nigel and Jevon shot and missed) and he had a really hard time guarding Tech's poor guards.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #45 on: February 05, 2015, 08:27:30 PM »
I mean, stats are funny.

With Marcus less than 30% of our shot attempts are threes. Without Marcus in this game 36.7% of our shots were threes.

Offline Clevey 2 Times

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1260
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech AD
« Reply #46 on: February 06, 2015, 08:39:55 AM »
I thought Roehlder looked like a walk on. He was completely no threat to score (at least Nigel and Jevon shot and missed) and he had a really hard time guarding Tech's poor guards.

Oh yea, he was pretty slow at closing out their shooters. Turner, for Tech , can shoot. He didn't kill Vulture, but would have if he played more minutes. On another note, Turner seems like a world class bad person.

oscar starting Vulture probably only solidifies his job in the eyes of the head in sand, tuck crowd. It becomes a convenient "deserving white boy" move by oscar. If the herb smoking is the reason Marcus and Malek were suspended, the tuck perception is even more solidified.

All of this is to suggest we've probably got oscar until at least 2017.

#bruceway

Offline Clevey 2 Times

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1260
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #47 on: February 06, 2015, 08:42:56 AM »
I mean, stats are funny.

With Marcus less than 30% of our shot attempts are threes. Without Marcus in this game 36.7% of our shots were threes.

This is explained as a result of probably 2 things:

1- they packed in defensively and dared us to shoot

2- we are terribly coached

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #48 on: February 06, 2015, 08:45:57 AM »
I thought Roehlder looked like a walk on. He was completely no threat to score (at least Nigel and Jevon shot and missed) and he had a really hard time guarding Tech's poor guards.

Oh yea, he was pretty slow at closing out their shooters. Turner, for Tech , can shoot. He didn't kill Vulture, but would have if he played more minutes. On another note, Turner seems like a world class bad person.

oscar starting Vulture probably only solidifies his job in the eyes of the head in sand, tuck crowd. It becomes a convenient "deserving white boy" move by oscar. If the herb smoking is the reason Marcus and Malek were suspended, the tuck perception is even more solidified.

All of this is to suggest we've probably got oscar until at least 2017.

#bruceway

Perhaps for some. Eventually people will run out of patience for "losing the right way", especially at current market value. I think that will be 2 years, 3 at the most. IMO, there are plenty of people I think most gE folks would consider tucks that are not happy with the state of the program right now.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Simply PatheTECH; Tech ADV
« Reply #49 on: February 06, 2015, 08:47:42 AM »
I mean, stats are funny.

With Marcus less than 30% of our shot attempts are threes. Without Marcus in this game 36.7% of our shots were threes.

This is explained as a result of probably 2 things:

1- they packed in defensively and dared us to shoot

2- we are terribly coached

Oh, they definitely dared us to shoot. And to be fair, we shot okay (33%) from 3. It was shooting 42% on 2s (compared to 59% for Tech) that was a bigger problem.