0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: puniraptor on February 04, 2015, 08:41:23 PMShouldn't the nanny be self employed and you are a customer?http://www.myhomepay.com/Answers/State-Nanny-Tax/KS/Overview
Shouldn't the nanny be self employed and you are a customer?
i agree. what i'm saying is the nanny should have to take care of that all on her own
Maybe he's counting his income as tax on his income.
Quote from: michigancat on February 04, 2015, 08:44:22 PMQuote from: puniraptor on February 04, 2015, 08:41:23 PMShouldn't the nanny be self employed and you are a customer?http://www.myhomepay.com/Answers/State-Nanny-Tax/KS/Overviewyeah, that's stupid. seems like a perfect situation to be classified as an independent contractor
i don't think a household is a business. it would essentially be the same thing, but the responsibility should fall on the nanny, not the household. just seems overly complicated.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning. They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.
Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on February 04, 2015, 09:33:26 PMi don't think a household is a business. it would essentially be the same thing, but the responsibility should fall on the nanny, not the household. just seems overly complicated.Don't care either way FICA withholding isn't a tax to the employer
a nanny seems like an employee to me? at least at the threshold they set
Quote from: Dugout DickStone on February 04, 2015, 09:39:03 PMQuote from: libliblibliblibliblib on February 04, 2015, 09:33:26 PMi don't think a household is a business. it would essentially be the same thing, but the responsibility should fall on the nanny, not the household. just seems overly complicated.Don't care either way FICA withholding isn't a tax to the employerThe employer has to match fica, whiz bang
nanny tax is a weird thing to complain about, ksuw. your lifestyle has outstripped the ability to run the household without having an employee, seems like a reasonable cost?
Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 04, 2015, 09:45:23 PMQuote from: Dugout DickStone on February 04, 2015, 09:39:03 PMQuote from: libliblibliblibliblib on February 04, 2015, 09:33:26 PMi don't think a household is a business. it would essentially be the same thing, but the responsibility should fall on the nanny, not the household. just seems overly complicated.Don't care either way FICA withholding isn't a tax to the employerThe employer has to match fica, whiz bangThis is just one reason why kids should be required to a take a financial literacy class in highschool. There are actually dumbasses in this thread who didn't realize that employers are required to pay a matching 7.65% for FICA/MC. Then there's state and federal unemployment tax, too.
Quote from: K-S-U-Wildcats! on February 04, 2015, 09:49:35 PMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 04, 2015, 09:45:23 PMQuote from: Dugout DickStone on February 04, 2015, 09:39:03 PMQuote from: libliblibliblibliblib on February 04, 2015, 09:33:26 PMi don't think a household is a business. it would essentially be the same thing, but the responsibility should fall on the nanny, not the household. just seems overly complicated.Don't care either way FICA withholding isn't a tax to the employerThe employer has to match fica, whiz bangThis is just one reason why kids should be required to a take a financial literacy class in highschool. There are actually dumbasses in this thread who didn't realize that employers are required to pay a matching 7.65% for FICA/MC. Then there's state and federal unemployment tax, too.Is your nanny a full time salaried employee?
