Author Topic: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV  (Read 5591 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #25 on: January 15, 2015, 09:24:56 AM »
I think we should acknowledge that both Nigel and Jevon suck and we should move past the notion that one of them needs to be on the court forty minutes a game.

I'd love to see a JUCO guy come in with Brown and then Jevon and Nigel transfer.  Then save that third open scholarship for 2016.

But I doubt that happens.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #26 on: January 15, 2015, 09:40:49 AM »
I don't necessarily want them both to transfer, but I also don't think one of them ALWAYS needs to be on the court.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #27 on: January 15, 2015, 09:41:13 AM »
obvs to me the jury is still out on nigel but he prob does suck but does he suck as bad as jt?  it's hard for me to believe. 
finding a better pg isn't that difficult


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Dub

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3014
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #28 on: January 15, 2015, 09:46:02 AM »
I would have liked to see what Nigel could have done with significant PT this last game.  I just don't see him playing much in the next 5 games.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #29 on: January 15, 2015, 09:50:43 AM »
I don't necessarily want them both to transfer, but I also don't think one of them ALWAYS needs to be on the court.

Yeah, the funny thing is that oscar already takes both of them out in close games at the end and leaves Marcus at PG. He could probably afford to do that 10 minutes a game and be okay.

I don't think Jevon is terrible, but he's definitely a work in progress and oscar definitely needs to work to recruit a better player. And I think overall that Jevon is better than Nigel. Both are probably back up PGs at the Big 12 level.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45938
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #30 on: January 15, 2015, 10:08:27 AM »
gip needs to figure crap out quickly

jevon- I've seen enough, he is what he is. I'll take Nigel

hurt continues to improve

fingers crossed for Edwards

Wes has upside

Jevon was solid in the 2nd half. I don't understand all the hate on him.

if, as MiR and dave armstrong would have us believe, the OU game was jevon's high water mark, then eff that crap.



Wait, what


Offline illBisonYourdele

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 249
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #31 on: January 15, 2015, 10:23:22 AM »
dont know why but I feel the floor is generally spaced better when Nigel is at the helm.  he also dribbles with his head up (but ducks his shoulders).  to me, Jevon's head is always down, going nowhere, and he seems to crowd the floor with his penetration.  these could be 'set dependent' observations but it is something I have been noticing.




Offline Reboulet

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 161
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #32 on: January 15, 2015, 11:14:33 AM »
I don't necessarily want them both to transfer, but I also don't think one of them ALWAYS needs to be on the court.

Yeah, the funny thing is that oscar already takes both of them out in close games at the end and leaves Marcus at PG. He could probably afford to do that 10 minutes a game and be okay.

I don't think Jevon is terrible, but he's definitely a work in progress and oscar definitely needs to work to recruit a better player. And I think overall that Jevon is better than Nigel. Both are probably back up PGs at the Big 12 level.

I agree, but I wish Marcus would prove he can handle the ball. His turnover at half court vs Tech was very WTF - defender stumbles behind Marcus after almost stealing the ball off his dribble, then comes back and steals the ball from behind. It was as if Marcus thought the guy took a dive over the press table instead of being 3 feet behind him.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #33 on: January 15, 2015, 11:17:51 AM »


I don't necessarily want them both to transfer, but I also don't think one of them ALWAYS needs to be on the court.

Yeah, the funny thing is that oscar already takes both of them out in close games at the end and leaves Marcus at PG. He could probably afford to do that 10 minutes a game and be okay.

I don't think Jevon is terrible, but he's definitely a work in progress and oscar definitely needs to work to recruit a better player. And I think overall that Jevon is better than Nigel. Both are probably back up PGs at the Big 12 level.

I agree, but I wish Marcus would prove he can handle the ball. His turnover at half court vs Tech was very WTF - defender stumbles behind Marcus after almost stealing the ball off his dribble, then comes back and steals the ball from behind. It was as if Marcus thought the guy took a dive over the press table instead of being 3 feet behind him.

All our guards have had moments like that

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55958
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #34 on: January 15, 2015, 11:21:55 AM »


I don't necessarily want them both to transfer, but I also don't think one of them ALWAYS needs to be on the court.

Yeah, the funny thing is that oscar already takes both of them out in close games at the end and leaves Marcus at PG. He could probably afford to do that 10 minutes a game and be okay.

I don't think Jevon is terrible, but he's definitely a work in progress and oscar definitely needs to work to recruit a better player. And I think overall that Jevon is better than Nigel. Both are probably back up PGs at the Big 12 level.

I agree, but I wish Marcus would prove he can handle the ball. His turnover at half court vs Tech was very WTF - defender stumbles behind Marcus after almost stealing the ball off his dribble, then comes back and steals the ball from behind. It was as if Marcus thought the guy took a dive over the press table instead of being 3 feet behind him.

All our guards have had moments like that
Plus it's a great teaching moment for your best player

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5676
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #35 on: January 15, 2015, 11:23:06 AM »
i actually really like the lineup of foster, edwards, Westicles, hurt, gip. it makes no sense why, but for short stretches could cause some mismatches.

if foster can bring the ball up, and Westicles has looked decent bringing it up as well, it could be something to eff with here and there.

Offline dal9

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1786
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #36 on: January 15, 2015, 11:23:17 AM »

i'm not hating on him.  he's playing like a 3rd string PG, why can't you admit that?
he needs to get better or get out of the way.  i'm ready to see what nigel can do with the same opportunity that jevon has been given.  he surely can be as mediocre as jevon has been and might turn the ball over less.  possessions are very important for this team. 


Jevon makes passes that Nigel is afraid to/cannot. Sometimes that results in a TO, but most of the time the outcome is good. Jevon also has significantly better handles, and plays better defense. The difference in shooting ability between them is shrinking. It's easy to say Nigel is a better "decision-maker," but really, he is just more low-risk, for better or worse.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #37 on: January 15, 2015, 11:48:21 AM »
low risk  is better for this team and there is no argument that you could make that it isn't


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #38 on: January 15, 2015, 11:55:19 AM »
I try to combine my own eye test with the numbers, and that combination tells me that Jevon and Nigel are capable players as point guards (to an extent). Jevon currently sits at 8.7 assists per 100 and Nigel at 7.6. Granted, I'm not looking at A:TO which is also a helpful number (both need to make significant improvements; Jevon is at 5.5 TO per 100, Nigel at 3.7), but both guys are pretty decent at raw assists when you compare them to other K-State players going back to 2001.


Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38078
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #39 on: January 15, 2015, 02:22:08 PM »
Taking the FAN stats on TO's and Assists and mushing those into my eyes, I would say there is zero reason that Jevon should play any more than Nigel.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #40 on: January 15, 2015, 02:24:32 PM »
Taking the FAN stats on TO's and Assists and mushing those into my eyes, I would say there is zero reason that Jevon should play any more than Nigel.

Yeah, then you see Nigel/Jevon play like they did in Norman and you question yourself. At least I do.

Offline Shooter Jones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5676
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #41 on: January 15, 2015, 02:37:21 PM »
i'm gonna tuck it in deep here: but, over the last week and a half, i really like the intrinsic values JT brings this team when he is on the floor. i think it was a big part of getting the team out of that funk. to me, he plays w/ more effort, energy, has better interactions w/ teammates, etc.

if the stats are even, i want the guy that brings that on the floor.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #42 on: January 15, 2015, 02:41:46 PM »
Taking the FAN stats on TO's and Assists and mushing those into my eyes, I would say there is zero reason that Jevon should play any more than Nigel.

you could have just taken my posts in this thread to reach that conclusion, but hey, dumbass is going to dumbass


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38078
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #43 on: January 15, 2015, 02:43:02 PM »
Sorry, 'clams.  didn't realize you posted in this thread.   Weird. 

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #44 on: January 15, 2015, 02:46:27 PM »
not a big deal at all, i have you on ignore so whatever


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline dal9

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1786
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #45 on: January 15, 2015, 03:05:16 PM »
anyone know what their +/- or ortg/drtg look like? maybe since conference?

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #46 on: January 15, 2015, 03:11:58 PM »
anyone know what their +/- or ortg/drtg look like? maybe since conference?

Jevon's ortg in conference games: 63, 114, 83, 91. 13 assists and 8 turnovers. 18 total points, 4-7 shooting, no 3PAs.
Nigel's ortg in conference games: 62, na, na, 74. 5 assists and 7 turnovers. 9 total points, 3-5 shooting, 1-6 from 3.

Offline dal9

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1786
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #47 on: January 15, 2015, 03:40:50 PM »
anyone know what their +/- or ortg/drtg look like? maybe since conference?

Jevon's ortg in conference games: 63, 114, 83, 91. 13 assists and 8 turnovers. 18 total points, 4-7 shooting, no 3PAs.
Nigel's ortg in conference games: 62, na, na, 74. 5 assists and 7 turnovers. 9 total points, 3-5 shooting, 1-6 from 3.
thanks.  i'm sure the numbers were quite ugly for both in noncon. 


Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #48 on: January 15, 2015, 04:09:13 PM »

anyone know what their +/- or ortg/drtg look like? maybe since conference?

Jevon's ortg in conference games: 63, 114, 83, 91. 13 assists and 8 turnovers. 18 total points, 4-7 shooting, no 3PAs.
Nigel's ortg in conference games: 62, na, na, 74. 5 assists and 7 turnovers. 9 total points, 3-5 shooting, 1-6 from 3.
thanks.  i'm sure the numbers were quite ugly for both in noncon.

Also, there are no good sources for individual college drtg. And IMO +/- for college is marginal at best and probably meaningless.

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: No traps for oscar: Tech ADV
« Reply #49 on: January 15, 2015, 05:08:27 PM »
Jevon needs to control his turnovers and knock down his free-throws. He would be looked in a completely different light if he did. Believe he is close.