isn't it odd that you take the conservative/republican/anti-liberal/anti-democrat stance on every single issue that ever pops up? if you disagree with the premise of the question, can you give an example of where this isn't the case? i'm not gE'ing or anything, i just want to hear what your reasoning is
I'll give you five examples off the top of my head...
I support OTC morning after pill because I believe it further weakens the argument for the necessity of abortion. I believe the general consensus among social conservatives is to oppose such drugs OTC.
As to the contraception = murder point, I suppose some might believe that, but there's a pretty significant difference between preventing conception or embryo implantation and killing a fetus that, if not viable, has actually developed into some semblance of a human being with a heart, brain, nerves, etc. The silver lining of morning-after pills being available OTC and at hospitals is that it further reduces any argument for the necessity of abortion.
I oppose ag subsidies, just like other forms of corporate welfare. Most conservatives - at least rural conservatives - would disagree with that.
The total farm bill costs about a trillion dollars over 10 years. That's about $100 billion per year. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/01/28/the-950-billion-farm-bill-in-one-chart/
The bulk of this spending is food stamps, and that can certainly be trimmed, but ag subsidies should be trimmed, too.
I have criticized Republicans' strategy - or lack thereof - on immigration. I have said that it is not enough to simply oppose Obama on immigration - they must put forward an affirmative comprehensive proposal incorporating strict immigration enforcement.
Welp, never mind. Guess Republicans are going to be dumbfucks and get killed yet again on immigration and silly budget battles.
http://dailysignal.com/2014/11/07/heres-conservatives-aim-stop-obamas-action-illegal-immigrants/
Instead of passing enforcement first immigration reform that the American people would overwhelmingly support, they're just going to (1) threaten the President, (2) bitch and moan when he signs his executive amnesty, and (3) start another budget war by trying to withhold spending for whatever it is Obama wants to implement. In short - exactly what Obama wants the pubtards to do. 
I criticized Brownback for pandering to rural Kansans by claiming that Paul Davis wants to consolidate rural schools - first, it wasn't true, and second, we should be consolidating rural schools.
Finally, I have been repeatedly critical of the growth of government and spending under GWB.
